Hatzav Yoffe, Keagan Rankin, Chris Bachmann, I. D. Posen, Shoshanna Saxe
{"title":"Mapping construction sector greenhouse gas emissions: a crucial step in sustainably meeting increasing housing demands","authors":"Hatzav Yoffe, Keagan Rankin, Chris Bachmann, I. D. Posen, Shoshanna Saxe","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ad546a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper examines the tension between needing to build more infrastructure and housing and simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change. This study uses an Environmentally Extended Input-Output (EEIO) approach to conduct a high-resolution top-down analysis of Canada's national construction GHG emissions. Our findings highlight that Canada's current construction practices cannot accommodate the construction required to restore housing affordability by 2030 without substantial environmental consequences. On a consumption life cycle basis, the construction sector was responsible for approximately 90 Mt CO2e in 2018, equivalent to over 8% of Canada’s total GHG emissions, while delivering less than a third of Canada’s annual housing needs. Residential construction was responsible for the largest share (42%) of total construction emissions. Overall, 84% of emissions are from material manufacturing and 35% of construction emissions are imported, underscoring the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework addressing both domestic and imported emissions. Under current construction practices (i.e., current material use patterns and emissions intensities), meeting Canada’s 2030 housing affordability and climate commitments requires an 83% reduction in GHG emissions per construction product (i.e., per home) compared to the 40% economy-wide reduction promised in Canada’s international reduction commitments. Mitigating the GHG gap between emission caps and housing demand calls for changes in the ratio of housing to other infrastructure (e.g. fewer roads, less fossil fuel infrastructure), new construction approaches (e.g. increasing material efficiency) and/or disproportionally allocating climate budget to construction. The implications of our study extend beyond Canada, offering valuable insights for other growing countries with climate goals. The results emphasize the urgency in considering and establishing sectoral GHG budgets for construction and for transformative changes in the construction sector to meet national GHG emission reduction commitments.","PeriodicalId":476263,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability","volume":"344 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research: infrastructure and sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad546a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper examines the tension between needing to build more infrastructure and housing and simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change. This study uses an Environmentally Extended Input-Output (EEIO) approach to conduct a high-resolution top-down analysis of Canada's national construction GHG emissions. Our findings highlight that Canada's current construction practices cannot accommodate the construction required to restore housing affordability by 2030 without substantial environmental consequences. On a consumption life cycle basis, the construction sector was responsible for approximately 90 Mt CO2e in 2018, equivalent to over 8% of Canada’s total GHG emissions, while delivering less than a third of Canada’s annual housing needs. Residential construction was responsible for the largest share (42%) of total construction emissions. Overall, 84% of emissions are from material manufacturing and 35% of construction emissions are imported, underscoring the need for a comprehensive regulatory framework addressing both domestic and imported emissions. Under current construction practices (i.e., current material use patterns and emissions intensities), meeting Canada’s 2030 housing affordability and climate commitments requires an 83% reduction in GHG emissions per construction product (i.e., per home) compared to the 40% economy-wide reduction promised in Canada’s international reduction commitments. Mitigating the GHG gap between emission caps and housing demand calls for changes in the ratio of housing to other infrastructure (e.g. fewer roads, less fossil fuel infrastructure), new construction approaches (e.g. increasing material efficiency) and/or disproportionally allocating climate budget to construction. The implications of our study extend beyond Canada, offering valuable insights for other growing countries with climate goals. The results emphasize the urgency in considering and establishing sectoral GHG budgets for construction and for transformative changes in the construction sector to meet national GHG emission reduction commitments.