Between-microcycle variability of external soccer training loads through the evaluation of a contemporary periodisation training model ‘CUPs’

Adam Owen, Matthew Weston, Colin Clancy
{"title":"Between-microcycle variability of external soccer training loads through the evaluation of a contemporary periodisation training model ‘CUPs’","authors":"Adam Owen, Matthew Weston, Colin Clancy","doi":"10.1177/17479541241251424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variation in training load is consistently demonstrated within weekly microcycles in soccer, yet less is known of load variations between the same weekday sessions across different microcycles. Our study aim was to examine between-microcycle variability in key measures of external training load. Thirty-seven professional soccer players participated in this observational study which took place across the clubs' initial 8-week in-season mesocycle of the 2022/23 season. During this mesocycle, each 1-week microcycle consisted of four distinct classifications of training session (Matchday (MD)-4, MD-3, MD-2, and MD-1, and one match (Saturday). External load data (total distance, high-intensity (>5.5 m.s) distance, high-intensity accelerations (>3 m/s2), and percentage (%) of maximal speed attained) were collected across 564 training sessions (MD-4 = 123, MD-3 = 148, MD-2 = 130, MD-1 = 163). Data were analysed with mixed linear modelling. When compared to the first microcycle, substantial week-to-week variation was evident for each of the four training session classifications, ranging from 1244 m to 2248 m for total distance, 80 m to 197 m for high-intensity distance, 11 to 25 for high-intensity accelerations, and 10.2 percentage points to 15.4 percentage points for % maximal speed. Our data show that despite training sessions having a consistency of planned training stimulus across an 8-week mesocycle, external load varied between microcycles. Nevertheless, within-player variability on the same day relative to matchday indicated a more consistent stimulus for key training variables relevant to specific training days.","PeriodicalId":507869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241251424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variation in training load is consistently demonstrated within weekly microcycles in soccer, yet less is known of load variations between the same weekday sessions across different microcycles. Our study aim was to examine between-microcycle variability in key measures of external training load. Thirty-seven professional soccer players participated in this observational study which took place across the clubs' initial 8-week in-season mesocycle of the 2022/23 season. During this mesocycle, each 1-week microcycle consisted of four distinct classifications of training session (Matchday (MD)-4, MD-3, MD-2, and MD-1, and one match (Saturday). External load data (total distance, high-intensity (>5.5 m.s) distance, high-intensity accelerations (>3 m/s2), and percentage (%) of maximal speed attained) were collected across 564 training sessions (MD-4 = 123, MD-3 = 148, MD-2 = 130, MD-1 = 163). Data were analysed with mixed linear modelling. When compared to the first microcycle, substantial week-to-week variation was evident for each of the four training session classifications, ranging from 1244 m to 2248 m for total distance, 80 m to 197 m for high-intensity distance, 11 to 25 for high-intensity accelerations, and 10.2 percentage points to 15.4 percentage points for % maximal speed. Our data show that despite training sessions having a consistency of planned training stimulus across an 8-week mesocycle, external load varied between microcycles. Nevertheless, within-player variability on the same day relative to matchday indicated a more consistent stimulus for key training variables relevant to specific training days.
通过评估当代周期化训练模式 "CUPs",评估足球外部训练负荷在微周期之间的可变性
在足球运动中,每周微循环内的训练负荷变化是一致的,但对于不同微循环中同一工作日训练课之间的负荷变化却知之甚少。我们的研究目的是检测外部训练负荷的关键指标在微周期之间的变化。37 名职业足球运动员参加了这项观察性研究,研究跨越了 2022/23 赛季俱乐部最初的 8 周赛季中周期。在这个中周期中,每个为期一周的微周期包括四次不同类别的训练课(比赛日(MD)-4、MD-3、MD-2 和 MD-1)和一场比赛(周六)。在 564 次训练中收集了外部负荷数据(总距离、高强度(>5.5 米/秒)距离、高强度加速度(>3 米/秒2)和达到最大速度的百分比(%))(MD-4 = 123 次,MD-3 = 148 次,MD-2 = 130 次,MD-1 = 163 次)。数据采用混合线性模型进行分析。与第一个微周期相比,四次训练课中的每一次在周与周之间都有明显的差异,总距离从1244米到2248米不等,高强度距离从80米到197米不等,高强度加速度从11到25不等,最大速度百分比从10.2个百分点到15.4个百分点不等。我们的数据显示,尽管在为期 8 周的中周期训练中,计划的训练刺激是一致的,但外部负荷在微周期之间是不同的。不过,与比赛日相比,同一天的球员内部差异表明,与特定训练日相关的关键训练变量的刺激更为一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信