Is 3mm surgical margin safe in head and neck basal cell carcinoma smaller than 2cm; in relation to various risk factor.

Hea Kyeong Shin, Min Jun Yong
{"title":"Is 3mm surgical margin safe in head and neck basal cell carcinoma smaller than 2cm; in relation to various risk factor.","authors":"Hea Kyeong Shin, Min Jun Yong","doi":"10.1055/a-2338-9192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nBasal cell carcinoma(BCC) is the most common of non-melanoma skin cancer. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. When removing tumor cells, achieving complete excision with minimal safety margins and reconstructing the defect to preserve the original appearance are important. In this study, we used a 3 mm resection margin to confirm recurrence and re-resection rates.\n\nMethods \nElectronic medical records and photographic data were obtained for patients with primary BCC lesions less than 2cm in diameter who underwent wide excision with a 3mm surgical margin from January 2015 to November 2021. We analyzed factors determining recurrence and re-resection rates, such as tumor size, location, age, sex, underlying diseases (including immunosuppression state), ethnicity, subtypes, tumor borders etc. \n\nResults \nThis study included 205 patients. The mean age and follow-up period were 73.0 ± 11.5 years and 10.2 ± 8.0 months, respectively. The recurrence and re-resection rates were 1.95%, and 25.85%, respectively.\nA statistically significant correlation was found between recurrence rate and tumor border. (P = 0.013) And the re-resection rate was correlated statistically location (P = 0.022), and immunosuppressed patients. (P = 0.006) \n\nConclusion \nWe found that a 3 mm excision margin provided sufficient safety in small facial BCC, resulting in ease of surgery and better aesthetic outcomes.\nHowever, surgical margins must be determined case by case by integrating various patient factors. In particular, a surgical margin of ≥ 4 mm is required for BCC in high-risk areas or immunosuppressed patients or poorly-defined border.\n","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":"87 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2338-9192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Basal cell carcinoma(BCC) is the most common of non-melanoma skin cancer. Typically, resection requires a safety margin ≥ 4 mm. When removing tumor cells, achieving complete excision with minimal safety margins and reconstructing the defect to preserve the original appearance are important. In this study, we used a 3 mm resection margin to confirm recurrence and re-resection rates. Methods Electronic medical records and photographic data were obtained for patients with primary BCC lesions less than 2cm in diameter who underwent wide excision with a 3mm surgical margin from January 2015 to November 2021. We analyzed factors determining recurrence and re-resection rates, such as tumor size, location, age, sex, underlying diseases (including immunosuppression state), ethnicity, subtypes, tumor borders etc. Results This study included 205 patients. The mean age and follow-up period were 73.0 ± 11.5 years and 10.2 ± 8.0 months, respectively. The recurrence and re-resection rates were 1.95%, and 25.85%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between recurrence rate and tumor border. (P = 0.013) And the re-resection rate was correlated statistically location (P = 0.022), and immunosuppressed patients. (P = 0.006) Conclusion We found that a 3 mm excision margin provided sufficient safety in small facial BCC, resulting in ease of surgery and better aesthetic outcomes. However, surgical margins must be determined case by case by integrating various patient factors. In particular, a surgical margin of ≥ 4 mm is required for BCC in high-risk areas or immunosuppressed patients or poorly-defined border.
小于 2 厘米的头颈部基底细胞癌的 3 毫米手术切缘是否安全;与各种风险因素的关系。
背景 基底细胞癌(BCC)是最常见的非黑色素瘤皮肤癌。通常情况下,切除术的安全边缘需要≥ 4 毫米。在切除肿瘤细胞时,以最小的安全边际实现完全切除并重建缺损以保持原貌非常重要。方法 收集了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 11 月期间原发性 BCC 病灶直径小于 2 厘米、手术切缘为 3 毫米的患者的电子病历和照片资料。我们分析了决定复发率和再次切除率的因素,如肿瘤大小、位置、年龄、性别、基础疾病(包括免疫抑制状态)、种族、亚型、肿瘤边界等。结果 本研究共纳入 205 例患者。平均年龄(73.0±11.5)岁,平均随访时间(10.2±8.0)个月。复发率和再次切除率分别为 1.95% 和 25.85%。(复发率与肿瘤边界有统计学意义的相关性(P = 0.013),再切除率与肿瘤位置有统计学意义的相关性(P = 0.022),与免疫抑制患者有统计学意义的相关性(P = 0.006)。(P = 0.006) 结论 我们发现,3 毫米的切除边缘对小型面部 BCC 有足够的安全性,从而使手术更容易进行,并获得更好的美学效果。然而,手术切缘必须综合患者的各种因素,视具体情况而定,尤其是高危地区、免疫抑制患者或边界不清的 BCC,手术切缘必须≥4 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信