Housing Policy in Lithuania: A Qualitative Study of Social Housing Problems

Jolanta Aidukaite
{"title":"Housing Policy in Lithuania: A Qualitative Study of Social Housing Problems","authors":"Jolanta Aidukaite","doi":"10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the Lithuanian housing policy system, with a special emphasis on social housing issues. This study is based on 20 semi-structured interviews with the decision makers and recipients of social housing. The analysis reveals the issues related to access to social housing, management and administration issues, problems related to stigmatisation of social housing recipients, and their overall satisfaction with the provided support.The study shows that accessing social housing and living in social housing is not an easy task. Social housing recipients have to wait in queues for a long time, experience stigmatisation and constant fear that they may lose their social housing due to a strict income monitoring. On the other hand, the municipality tries to provide friendly strategies to solve individual cases and looks for the best solutions possible to meet the needs of social housing recipients. The findings show that massive privatisation in Lithuania created a dualistic housing market favouring home ownership and marginalising social housing as a safety net for the most vulnerable people. At the same time, a massive home ownership society formed a safety net for many, with family ties playing a crucial role. Housing safety is offered as a part of social assistance programs for the most vulnerable parts of the population.","PeriodicalId":502666,"journal":{"name":"Filosofija. Sociologija","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofija. Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to examine the Lithuanian housing policy system, with a special emphasis on social housing issues. This study is based on 20 semi-structured interviews with the decision makers and recipients of social housing. The analysis reveals the issues related to access to social housing, management and administration issues, problems related to stigmatisation of social housing recipients, and their overall satisfaction with the provided support.The study shows that accessing social housing and living in social housing is not an easy task. Social housing recipients have to wait in queues for a long time, experience stigmatisation and constant fear that they may lose their social housing due to a strict income monitoring. On the other hand, the municipality tries to provide friendly strategies to solve individual cases and looks for the best solutions possible to meet the needs of social housing recipients. The findings show that massive privatisation in Lithuania created a dualistic housing market favouring home ownership and marginalising social housing as a safety net for the most vulnerable people. At the same time, a massive home ownership society formed a safety net for many, with family ties playing a crucial role. Housing safety is offered as a part of social assistance programs for the most vulnerable parts of the population.
立陶宛的住房政策:社会住房问题定性研究
本文旨在研究立陶宛的住房政策体系,特别强调社会住房问题。本研究基于对社会住房决策者和受益人进行的 20 次半结构化访谈。分析揭示了与获得社会住房有关的问题、管理和行政问题、与社会住房受益人被污名化有关的问题以及他们对所提供支持的总体满意度。研究表明,获得社会住房和在社会住房中生活并不是一件容易的事情。社会住房受益人需要长时间排队等候,遭受污名化,并时刻担心由于严格的收入监控而失去社会住房。另一方面,市政当局试图提供友好的策略来解决个别情况,并尽可能寻找最佳解决方案来满足社会住房受益人的需求。研究结果表明,立陶宛的大规模私有化造成了住房市场的二元化,有利于住房所有权,而社会住房作为最弱势人群的安全网则被边缘化。与此同时,大规模的住房所有权社会为许多人提供了一个安全网,其中家庭纽带发挥了至关重要的作用。住房安全是为人口中最弱势部分提供的社会援助计划的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信