NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) AND ITS ROLE FOR SECURITY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS

Sheqir Kutllovci, Orhan Çeku
{"title":"NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) AND ITS ROLE FOR SECURITY IN THE WESTERN BALKANS","authors":"Sheqir Kutllovci, Orhan Çeku","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-7.3-a000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nThe North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the world’s largest and\nmost powerful collective security organisation in modern times. Membership in this\norganisation is the objective and effort of many countries, including most of the countries of\nthe Western Balkans. Membership ensures collective protection, security and political\nstability. Since its inception, NATO has emerged as a global force for security and the spread\nof peace almost across the globe. Not everyone deems it as such, considering the Russian\nFederation sees it as its main enemy. Its military operations have been centred around\nprotecting human rights and maintaining peace. The best example of this commitment is\nNATO’s humanitarian intervention in Kosovo, one of the countries of the Western Balkans.\nEven after June 1999, NATO was present in this country and took care of the peace and\nsecurity of the entire Western Balkans. The presence of this organisation in this part of the\nglobe remained essential, as did knowing the geopolitical history of this region.\nThe Balkans still suffers from nationalist policies and interethnic divisions, which in either case\nremain a very important factor for security in this region. One fundamental issue of Western\nBalkan countries is the acceleration of economic reforms, the rule of law and the fight against\ncorruption to achieve membership in the European Union. Instead of these important issues in\nthe Western Balkans, clashes have continued over border changes and nationalist rhetoric,\nwhich could undermine peace and security in this region. The current problems of the Western\nBalkans are inherited from the dissolution of the Socialist Federation of Yugoslavia. The wars\nin the former Yugoslavia, despite being the cause for the establishment of new independent\nstates, did not fulfil the ethnic expectations of these countries. Given that the Republic of Serbia,\nin the preamble of the 2006 Constitution, foresees the Republic of Kosovo as its own territory,1 legal action that expresses territorial claims against a sovereign state poses a risk for new\nconflicts in the Balkans. A situation with conflicting tendencies is also present in the Republic\nof Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the official policy of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia has\nopenly shown the tendencies for secession from the Federation and union with Serbia.2\nThis paper deals with the role that NATO has played and continues to play with its presence\nin the Balkans in maintaining peace and regional security, the challenges of security and\nbuilding a stable peace in this region of Europe, where nationalist tendencies dominate as well\nas interethnic problems, lack of political culture and deficits of democracy.\nMethods: \nCombined scientific methods were used in this paper, starting with the qualitative\nmethod and literature review. The qualitative method was used to interpret the scientific theories\nrelated to security. Reviewing the literature, we managed to combine the results of other studies\nrelated to our study topic. This paper also used the analysis method, which helped us separate the\nelements from the totality of the study problem. The historical method has served to show the axis\nof the security problem in the Balkans and to explain the development of NATO.\nResults and conclusions: \nAs a security organisation, during the Cold War, it served as a\nmechanism for collective defence against the nuclear threats of the Warsaw Pact and the spread\nof democratic values of the Western world. After the fall of the Iron Curtain, it has served as\nan organisation that promotes global peace and security, democracy, human rights and the\nrule of law. The existence of open political issues in the Western Balkans, in particular the\nterritorial claims of Serbia against Kosovo, the nationalist tendencies of the Serbs from Bosnia\nand Herzegovina for separation from the Federation, the attempts of Russia to influence this\nregion, using history, culture and intelligence services and some other issues such as the lack of\npolitical culture in Albania and Montenegro and the issues of North Macedonia with Bulgaria\nhave posed risks to the regional security. In this geopolitical environment called the Western\nBalkans, the integration of all countries in NATO and its presence in this region is essential for\nthe future and security. In this context, the membership of Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina\nin NATO will have to be a priority for Western countries. The membership of these two states\nwould serve regional peace and security.","PeriodicalId":502146,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-7.3-a000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is the world’s largest and most powerful collective security organisation in modern times. Membership in this organisation is the objective and effort of many countries, including most of the countries of the Western Balkans. Membership ensures collective protection, security and political stability. Since its inception, NATO has emerged as a global force for security and the spread of peace almost across the globe. Not everyone deems it as such, considering the Russian Federation sees it as its main enemy. Its military operations have been centred around protecting human rights and maintaining peace. The best example of this commitment is NATO’s humanitarian intervention in Kosovo, one of the countries of the Western Balkans. Even after June 1999, NATO was present in this country and took care of the peace and security of the entire Western Balkans. The presence of this organisation in this part of the globe remained essential, as did knowing the geopolitical history of this region. The Balkans still suffers from nationalist policies and interethnic divisions, which in either case remain a very important factor for security in this region. One fundamental issue of Western Balkan countries is the acceleration of economic reforms, the rule of law and the fight against corruption to achieve membership in the European Union. Instead of these important issues in the Western Balkans, clashes have continued over border changes and nationalist rhetoric, which could undermine peace and security in this region. The current problems of the Western Balkans are inherited from the dissolution of the Socialist Federation of Yugoslavia. The wars in the former Yugoslavia, despite being the cause for the establishment of new independent states, did not fulfil the ethnic expectations of these countries. Given that the Republic of Serbia, in the preamble of the 2006 Constitution, foresees the Republic of Kosovo as its own territory,1 legal action that expresses territorial claims against a sovereign state poses a risk for new conflicts in the Balkans. A situation with conflicting tendencies is also present in the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the official policy of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia has openly shown the tendencies for secession from the Federation and union with Serbia.2 This paper deals with the role that NATO has played and continues to play with its presence in the Balkans in maintaining peace and regional security, the challenges of security and building a stable peace in this region of Europe, where nationalist tendencies dominate as well as interethnic problems, lack of political culture and deficits of democracy. Methods: Combined scientific methods were used in this paper, starting with the qualitative method and literature review. The qualitative method was used to interpret the scientific theories related to security. Reviewing the literature, we managed to combine the results of other studies related to our study topic. This paper also used the analysis method, which helped us separate the elements from the totality of the study problem. The historical method has served to show the axis of the security problem in the Balkans and to explain the development of NATO. Results and conclusions: As a security organisation, during the Cold War, it served as a mechanism for collective defence against the nuclear threats of the Warsaw Pact and the spread of democratic values of the Western world. After the fall of the Iron Curtain, it has served as an organisation that promotes global peace and security, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The existence of open political issues in the Western Balkans, in particular the territorial claims of Serbia against Kosovo, the nationalist tendencies of the Serbs from Bosnia and Herzegovina for separation from the Federation, the attempts of Russia to influence this region, using history, culture and intelligence services and some other issues such as the lack of political culture in Albania and Montenegro and the issues of North Macedonia with Bulgaria have posed risks to the regional security. In this geopolitical environment called the Western Balkans, the integration of all countries in NATO and its presence in this region is essential for the future and security. In this context, the membership of Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina in NATO will have to be a priority for Western countries. The membership of these two states would serve regional peace and security.
北大西洋公约组织(NATO)及其对西巴尔干地区安全的作用
背景:北大西洋公约组织(NATO)是当代世界上最大、最强大的集体安全组织。加入该组织是包括大多数西巴尔干国家在内的许多国家的目标和努力方向。加入北约可确保集体保护、安全和政治稳定。自成立以来,北约已成为一支促进安全与和平的全球性力量,几乎遍布全球。但并非所有人都这样认为,因为俄罗斯联邦视北约为主要敌人。北约的军事行动一直以保护人权和维护和平为中心。北约在西巴尔干半岛国家之一科索沃的人道主义干预行动就是这一承诺的最好例证。即使在 1999 年 6 月之后,北约仍驻扎在这个国家,并负责整个西巴尔干半岛的和平与安全。该组织在这一地区的存在仍然是至关重要的,了解这一地区的地缘政治历史也是如此。巴尔干地区仍然存在民族主义政策和种族间分裂,无论哪种情况,这仍然是该地区安全的一个非常重要的因素。西巴尔干国家的一个根本问题是加快经济改革、法治和反腐败斗争,以加入欧盟。在西巴尔干地区,这些重要问题并没有得到解决,相反,因边界变化和民族主义言论而引发的冲突仍在继续,这可能会破坏该地区的和平与安全。西巴尔干目前的问题是南斯拉夫社会主义联邦解体后遗留下来的。前南斯拉夫的战争尽管导致了新的独立国家的建立,但并没有满足这些国家的民族期望。鉴于塞尔维亚共和国在 2006 年《宪法》序言中将科索沃共和国视为自己的领土,1 对一个主权国家提出领土要求的法律行动有可能在巴尔干地区引发新的冲突。2 本文论述了北约在巴尔干地区的存在在维护和平与地区安全方面已经发挥并将继续发挥的作用,以及在这个民族主义倾向占主导地位、民族间问题、缺乏政治文化和民主缺失的欧洲地区,安全和建设稳定和平所面临的挑战:本文采用了综合科学方法,首先是定性方法和文献综述。定性方法用于解释与安全相关的科学理论。在回顾文献时,我们将与研究主题相关的其他研究成果结合起来。本文还使用了分析方法,这有助于我们从研究问题的整体中分离出部分内容。历史方法有助于展示巴尔干地区安全问题的轴心,并解释北约的发展:作为一个安全组织,北约在冷战期间发挥了集体防御华约核威胁和传播西方世界民主价值观的作用。铁幕拉开后,它成为促进全球和平与安全、民主、人权和法治的组织。西巴尔干地区存在公开的政治问题,特别是塞尔维亚对科索沃的领土要求、波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那塞族人脱离联邦的民族主义倾向、俄罗斯利用历史、文化和情报部门影响该地区的企图,以及其他一些问题,如阿尔巴尼亚和黑山缺乏政治文化、北马其顿与保加利亚的问题等,都对地区安全构成了威胁。在这个被称为西巴尔干的地缘政治环境中,所有国家加入北约及其在该地区的存在对未来和安全至关重要。在这种情况下,西方国家必须优先考虑科索沃和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那加入北约的问题。这两个国家的加入将有利于地区和平与安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信