Grammatical Deviations in Philippine Phishing Emails

Julysa Cardona
{"title":"Grammatical Deviations in Philippine Phishing Emails","authors":"Julysa Cardona","doi":"10.32996/ijels.2024.6.2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just as language is proven to be useful in making day-to-day life convenient, some situations have also demonstrated the possibility of language being used to deceive people. One instance is the proliferating use of phishing emails. Given this occurrence, a riveting endeavor in the concept of actual language utilization is the study of grammatical deviations in phishing emails. Employing error analysis, this study sought to determine how a grammar study can be helpful in the examination of the imposters’ language, specifically in the case of phishing emails. The purpose of this research was to document the dominant errors that appeared in Philippine phishing emails and to explain how grammatical deviations can give away deception. The result of this research showed that of the fifteen collected phishing emails, all or 100% contained usage errors. This means that of the fifteen phishing emails in this study, each one has errors. The most frequent of these errors are errors in capitalization, punctuation, and word forms. This result implies that although imposters pretend to be legitimate, they cannot imitate and copy the language of authentic emails. This may be because when legitimate institutions and organizations like banks, schools, or establishments release official emails, they do so after thorough proofreading and editing. Phishers, however, may not have the same mechanisms to ensure grammar correctness and accuracy. Based on these findings, the researcher infers that with good grammar skills, one can have a larger inclination to distinguish phishing from genuine emails. Contrariwise, those who do not have profound knowledge of grammar conventions may have a larger possibility of falling into the phishing trap.","PeriodicalId":514576,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language Studies","volume":"59 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just as language is proven to be useful in making day-to-day life convenient, some situations have also demonstrated the possibility of language being used to deceive people. One instance is the proliferating use of phishing emails. Given this occurrence, a riveting endeavor in the concept of actual language utilization is the study of grammatical deviations in phishing emails. Employing error analysis, this study sought to determine how a grammar study can be helpful in the examination of the imposters’ language, specifically in the case of phishing emails. The purpose of this research was to document the dominant errors that appeared in Philippine phishing emails and to explain how grammatical deviations can give away deception. The result of this research showed that of the fifteen collected phishing emails, all or 100% contained usage errors. This means that of the fifteen phishing emails in this study, each one has errors. The most frequent of these errors are errors in capitalization, punctuation, and word forms. This result implies that although imposters pretend to be legitimate, they cannot imitate and copy the language of authentic emails. This may be because when legitimate institutions and organizations like banks, schools, or establishments release official emails, they do so after thorough proofreading and editing. Phishers, however, may not have the same mechanisms to ensure grammar correctness and accuracy. Based on these findings, the researcher infers that with good grammar skills, one can have a larger inclination to distinguish phishing from genuine emails. Contrariwise, those who do not have profound knowledge of grammar conventions may have a larger possibility of falling into the phishing trap.
菲律宾钓鱼邮件中的语法偏差
正如语言被证明可以为日常生活带来便利一样,一些情况也证明了语言被用来欺骗人们的可能性。网络钓鱼邮件的泛滥就是一个例子。鉴于这种情况的发生,研究网络钓鱼邮件中的语法偏差是实际语言使用概念中一项引人入胜的工作。本研究采用错误分析法,试图确定语法研究如何有助于检查冒名顶替者的语言,特别是在网络钓鱼电子邮件的情况下。本研究的目的是记录菲律宾网络钓鱼邮件中出现的主要错误,并解释语法偏差如何泄露欺骗信息。研究结果表明,在收集到的 15 封网络钓鱼邮件中,所有邮件或 100%的邮件都包含使用错误。也就是说,在本研究的 15 封钓鱼邮件中,每一封都有错误。这些错误中最常见的是大小写、标点符号和单词形式方面的错误。这一结果意味着,尽管冒名顶替者假装合法,但他们无法模仿和复制真实电子邮件的语言。这可能是因为银行、学校或单位等合法机构和组织在发布官方电子邮件时,都会经过彻底的校对和编辑。然而,网络钓鱼者可能没有同样的机制来确保语法的正确性和准确性。基于这些发现,研究人员推断,语法能力好的人更倾向于区分网络钓鱼邮件和真实邮件。相反,那些对语法习惯没有深刻认识的人可能更容易掉进网络钓鱼的陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信