Endovascular treatment of patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries

E. Kolomin, S. Goroshchenko, V. Bobinov, A. Petrov, L. Rozhchenko, K. Samochernykh
{"title":"Endovascular treatment of patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries","authors":"E. Kolomin, S. Goroshchenko, V. Bobinov, A. Petrov, L. Rozhchenko, K. Samochernykh","doi":"10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-2-15-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate short- and long‑term angiographic and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries.Materials and methods. The outcomes of endovascular treatment of 6 patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries who underwent surgery at the Neurosurgical Division No. 3 of the Polenov Russian Research Institute of Neurosurgery between January 1 of 2017 and March 31 of 2023 were analyzed.Results. The following endovascular methods were used: occlusion of the aneurysm sac using only detachable coils (n = 2); occlusion using stent‑assisted coiling (n = 3); deconstructive intervention with occlusion of the main artery (n = 1).  In 1 of 2 cases of coil‑only aneurysm occlusion, additional stent‑assisted occlusion was performed due to recurrence. Among 6 aneurysms, 1 (16.65 %) aneurysm was radically excluded from the blood flow (class А); 4 (66.7 %) were excluded subtotally (class B); 1 (16.65 %) was excluded partially (class С). Control angiography at least 6 months after showed radical exclusion of the aneurysm from the blood flow (class A) in 5 (83.3 %) patients, subtotal exclusion (class В) in 1 (16.7 %) patient. Clinical outcome was excellent in 5 (83.3 %) patients (0 points per the modified Rankin scale); in 1 patient after deconstructive surgery, augmentation of neurological symptoms with following partial regression was observed (2 points per the modified Rankin scale). Complications during deconstructive surgery were observed in 1 (16.7 %) patient.Conclusion. Deconstructive surgery of the distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries can be associated with high risk of postoperative ischemic complications with development of persisting neurological deficit. Surgical interventions with preservation of the artery lumen (including reconstructive surgeries) should be the method of choice in endovascular treatment of distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries due to minimal risk of ischemic complications and improved clinical outcomes of surgical treatment.","PeriodicalId":197162,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-2-15-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate short- and long‑term angiographic and clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries.Materials and methods. The outcomes of endovascular treatment of 6 patients with distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries who underwent surgery at the Neurosurgical Division No. 3 of the Polenov Russian Research Institute of Neurosurgery between January 1 of 2017 and March 31 of 2023 were analyzed.Results. The following endovascular methods were used: occlusion of the aneurysm sac using only detachable coils (n = 2); occlusion using stent‑assisted coiling (n = 3); deconstructive intervention with occlusion of the main artery (n = 1).  In 1 of 2 cases of coil‑only aneurysm occlusion, additional stent‑assisted occlusion was performed due to recurrence. Among 6 aneurysms, 1 (16.65 %) aneurysm was radically excluded from the blood flow (class А); 4 (66.7 %) were excluded subtotally (class B); 1 (16.65 %) was excluded partially (class С). Control angiography at least 6 months after showed radical exclusion of the aneurysm from the blood flow (class A) in 5 (83.3 %) patients, subtotal exclusion (class В) in 1 (16.7 %) patient. Clinical outcome was excellent in 5 (83.3 %) patients (0 points per the modified Rankin scale); in 1 patient after deconstructive surgery, augmentation of neurological symptoms with following partial regression was observed (2 points per the modified Rankin scale). Complications during deconstructive surgery were observed in 1 (16.7 %) patient.Conclusion. Deconstructive surgery of the distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries can be associated with high risk of postoperative ischemic complications with development of persisting neurological deficit. Surgical interventions with preservation of the artery lumen (including reconstructive surgeries) should be the method of choice in endovascular treatment of distal aneurysms of cerebellar arteries due to minimal risk of ischemic complications and improved clinical outcomes of surgical treatment.
小脑动脉远端动脉瘤患者的血管内治疗
目的评估小脑动脉远端动脉瘤患者血管内治疗的短期和长期血管造影和临床疗效。对2017年1月1日至2023年3月31日期间在俄罗斯波列诺夫神经外科研究所第三神经外科接受手术的6名小脑动脉远端动脉瘤患者的血管内治疗结果进行分析。使用了以下血管内方法:仅使用可拆卸线圈闭塞动脉瘤囊(n = 2);使用支架辅助卷曲闭塞(n = 3);闭塞主动脉的解构介入(n = 1)。 在 2 例仅使用线圈进行动脉瘤闭塞的病例中,有 1 例因复发而再次进行支架辅助闭塞。在 6 个动脉瘤中,1 个(16.65%)动脉瘤从根本上被排除在血流之外(А 级);4 个(66.7%)被部分排除(B 级);1 个(16.65%)被部分排除(С 级)。至少 6 个月后的对照血管造影显示,5 名患者(83.3%)的动脉瘤已完全脱离血流(A 级),1 名患者(16.7%)的动脉瘤部分脱离血流(В 级)。5例(83.3%)患者的临床疗效极佳(改良Rankin量表评分为0分);1例患者在解构手术后出现神经症状加重,随后部分缓解(改良Rankin量表评分为2分)。1名患者(16.7%)在解构手术中出现并发症。小脑动脉远端动脉瘤的解构手术与术后缺血性并发症的高风险相关,并可能导致持续的神经功能缺损。保留动脉管腔的手术干预(包括重建手术)应成为小脑动脉远端动脉瘤血管内治疗的首选方法,因为手术治疗的缺血性并发症风险最小,临床疗效更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信