Fathers' experiences, views and perspectives of childbirth attendance: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol

Nazia AlAmri, Sunita Panda, Valerie Smith
{"title":"Fathers' experiences, views and perspectives of childbirth attendance: A qualitative evidence synthesis protocol","authors":"Nazia AlAmri, Sunita Panda, Valerie Smith","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13879.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The involvement of husbands and male partners in childbirth no longer ceases at conception and pregnancy, rather fathers wish to be more involved in supporting their partners during childbirth. This aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) call for promoting male participation in childbirth, emphasising the benefits of support and the positive impact attending childbirth has for husbands/partners, and their maternal partner. This knowledge has led to global initiatives promoting \"humanised\" birth and a family-approach. To gain in-depth insight and understanding of childbirth attendance from the perspectives of fathers, a qualitative evidence synthesis is proposed. Methods To explore fathers' experiences, views, and perspectives of childbirth attendance. All studies that used qualitative methodologies to explore the phenomenon of interest will be included. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar will be systematically searched from their dates of inception to present, supplemented by a search for grey literature and a search of the reference list of included studies. Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) will be used to ensure the comprehensiveness of the search strategy. Methodological quality assessment of included studies, using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme assessment tool, and will be extracted from the included studies by two reviewers independently using a standard data extraction form. Thomas and Harden’s three-stage approach will be used to thematically synthesise the data: coding of data, developing descriptive themes, and generation of analytical themes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual confidence in the synthesised findings Comprehensive insight and understanding of fathers’ perspectives of childbirth attendance will be ascertained PROSPERO Registration No CRD42023470902","PeriodicalId":508744,"journal":{"name":"HRB Open Research","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13879.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The involvement of husbands and male partners in childbirth no longer ceases at conception and pregnancy, rather fathers wish to be more involved in supporting their partners during childbirth. This aligns with the World Health Organization's (WHO) call for promoting male participation in childbirth, emphasising the benefits of support and the positive impact attending childbirth has for husbands/partners, and their maternal partner. This knowledge has led to global initiatives promoting "humanised" birth and a family-approach. To gain in-depth insight and understanding of childbirth attendance from the perspectives of fathers, a qualitative evidence synthesis is proposed. Methods To explore fathers' experiences, views, and perspectives of childbirth attendance. All studies that used qualitative methodologies to explore the phenomenon of interest will be included. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, MIDIRS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar will be systematically searched from their dates of inception to present, supplemented by a search for grey literature and a search of the reference list of included studies. Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) will be used to ensure the comprehensiveness of the search strategy. Methodological quality assessment of included studies, using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme assessment tool, and will be extracted from the included studies by two reviewers independently using a standard data extraction form. Thomas and Harden’s three-stage approach will be used to thematically synthesise the data: coding of data, developing descriptive themes, and generation of analytical themes. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual confidence in the synthesised findings Comprehensive insight and understanding of fathers’ perspectives of childbirth attendance will be ascertained PROSPERO Registration No CRD42023470902
父亲对分娩护理的经验、观点和看法:定性证据综合协议
背景丈夫和男性伴侣对分娩的参与不再停留在受孕和怀孕阶段,相反,父亲们希望在分娩期间更多地参与对其伴侣的支持。这与世界卫生组织(WHO)关于促进男性参与分娩的呼吁相一致,强调了支持分娩的益处以及分娩对丈夫/伴侣及其产妇伴侣的积极影响。这一认识促使全球倡议提倡 "人性化 "分娩和家庭方式。为了从父亲的角度深入洞察和了解分娩护理,我们提出了一项定性证据综述。方法 探讨父亲对分娩护理的经验、看法和观点。所有使用定性方法探讨相关现象的研究都将被纳入。将系统地检索 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、MIDIRS、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 中从开始至今的所有研究,并检索灰色文献和所纳入研究的参考文献目录。为确保检索策略的全面性,将采用同行评审电子检索策略(PRESS)。两位审稿人将使用 "批判性评估技能计划"(The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme)评估工具对纳入研究进行方法学质量评估,并使用标准数据提取表从纳入研究中独立提取数据。将采用托马斯和哈登的三阶段方法对数据进行主题综合:数据编码、开发描述性主题和生成分析性主题。建议评估、发展和评价的分级--定性研究综述证据的可信度(GRADE-CERQual confidence in the synthesized findings 将确定对父亲分娩就诊观点的全面洞察和理解 PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42023470902
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信