Loss and Found: Barthes, Hidden Biography and Ethical Deficit in Alexander Gardner’s ‘Portrait of Lewis Payne’

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ART
Damian Sutton
{"title":"Loss and Found: Barthes, Hidden Biography and Ethical Deficit in Alexander Gardner’s ‘Portrait of Lewis Payne’","authors":"Damian Sutton","doi":"10.1080/17514517.2024.2353472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reconsideration of the symbolic landscape of the Civil War and Confederate iconography since events in Charleston, Charlottesville, and Minneapolis points toward a necessary reappraisal of Alexander Gardner ’ s 1865 portrait of Lincoln conspirator Lewis Payne (real name Lewis Powell), and its use by Roland Barthes as an illustration for his seminal 1980 book Camera Lucida . Barthes uses the photo-graph to illustrate a conceptual shift from the punctum , as an individual affect for the viewer, to the noeme , or ‘ that-has-been ’ appreciable in all photographs. As a result of an emblematic approach using a combination of motto , subscriptio , and illustration, key details of the photograph are misrepresented, and key features of Powell ’ s Confederate identity are erased. This study therefore explores the circumstances of the photograph ’ s production, its pre-carious existence as an unprinted cast-off, and its eventual appreciation as a distinctive example of portraiture ’ s power. Whereas in Civil War historiography Powell and this photograph are little more than footnotes, the debate around Confederate statues and symbols now begs the question of how the photograph should be contex-tualised in photography, media and cultural studies, where it has its greatest visibility by far.","PeriodicalId":42826,"journal":{"name":"Photography and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photography and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2024.2353472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reconsideration of the symbolic landscape of the Civil War and Confederate iconography since events in Charleston, Charlottesville, and Minneapolis points toward a necessary reappraisal of Alexander Gardner ’ s 1865 portrait of Lincoln conspirator Lewis Payne (real name Lewis Powell), and its use by Roland Barthes as an illustration for his seminal 1980 book Camera Lucida . Barthes uses the photo-graph to illustrate a conceptual shift from the punctum , as an individual affect for the viewer, to the noeme , or ‘ that-has-been ’ appreciable in all photographs. As a result of an emblematic approach using a combination of motto , subscriptio , and illustration, key details of the photograph are misrepresented, and key features of Powell ’ s Confederate identity are erased. This study therefore explores the circumstances of the photograph ’ s production, its pre-carious existence as an unprinted cast-off, and its eventual appreciation as a distinctive example of portraiture ’ s power. Whereas in Civil War historiography Powell and this photograph are little more than footnotes, the debate around Confederate statues and symbols now begs the question of how the photograph should be contex-tualised in photography, media and cultural studies, where it has its greatest visibility by far.
失而复得:亚历山大-加德纳的《刘易斯-佩恩肖像》中的巴特、隐藏的传记和伦理缺陷
自查尔斯顿、夏洛茨维尔和明尼阿波利斯事件以来,对南北战争的象征性景观和邦联图标的重新思考,指向了对亚历山大-加德纳 1865 年为林肯密谋者刘易斯-佩恩(本名刘易斯-鲍威尔)所作肖像的必要重新评价,以及罗兰-巴特 1980 年出版的开创性著作《照相机卢西达》将其用作插图的情况。巴特用这张照片说明了一种概念上的转变,即从作为观者个人情感的 "点"(punctum)到所有照片中都可欣赏到的 "面"(noeme)或 "曾经"(that-has-been)。由于采用了将格言、标点和插图相结合的象征性方法,照片的关键细节被歪曲,鲍威尔邦联身份的关键特征被抹去。因此,本研究探讨了这张照片的制作环境、它作为未印刷品的危险存在,以及它作为肖像画力量的独特典范最终受到的赞赏。在内战史学中,鲍威尔和这张照片不过是脚注而已,而现在围绕邦联雕像和标志的争论则引出了一个问题:在摄影、媒体和文化研究中,这张照片应该如何被语境化,因为它在这些研究中的知名度是最高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
22
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信