{"title":"From conceptual to literary metaphors","authors":"M. D. Porto","doi":"10.1075/cogls.00111.por","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more\n conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Zoltán\n Kövecses 2010). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that\n remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the\n aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary\n metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics (Semir\n Zeki 2001; Vilayanur Ramachandran 2003), an emerging empirical discipline,\n are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of\n metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses\n posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"42 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00111.por","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more
conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Zoltán
Kövecses 2010). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that
remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the
aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary
metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics (Semir
Zeki 2001; Vilayanur Ramachandran 2003), an emerging empirical discipline,
are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of
metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses
posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.