From conceptual to literary metaphors

M. D. Porto
{"title":"From conceptual to literary metaphors","authors":"M. D. Porto","doi":"10.1075/cogls.00111.por","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more\n conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Zoltán\n Kövecses 2010). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that\n remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the\n aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary\n metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics (Semir\n Zeki 2001; Vilayanur Ramachandran 2003), an emerging empirical discipline,\n are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of\n metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses\n posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"42 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00111.por","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is generally agreed that literary metaphors are produced and interpreted by using the same strategies as more conventional, ordinary metaphorical expressions (George Lakoff & Mark Turner 1989; Zoltán Kövecses 2010). However, the aesthetic experience of reading metaphors in literature is a complex phenomenon that remains only partially explained. This paper aims at contributing to the study of the cognitive mechanisms that allow the aesthetic experience when reading poetic metaphors. For this purpose, after a short review of previous research on literary metaphors in the Cognitive Linguistic framework, the main tenets of Neuroaesthetics (Semir Zeki 2001; Vilayanur Ramachandran 2003), an emerging empirical discipline, are presented as referred to the study of visual art. Then, the insights from both fields are compared and applied to the study of metaphors. Results show significant coincidences as empirical research in neuroscience seem to confirm the theories and hypotheses posed by cognitive linguists, as for the way in which the emotional response to poetic metaphors is elicited.
从概念隐喻到文学隐喻
人们普遍认为,文学隐喻的产生和阐释所使用的策略与更传统、更普通的隐喻表达方式相同(乔治-拉科夫和马克-特纳,1989 年;佐尔坦-科维切斯,2010 年)。然而,文学作品中隐喻的审美阅读体验是一个复杂的现象,目前还只是得到了部分解释。本文旨在促进对阅读诗歌隐喻时产生审美体验的认知机制的研究。为此,在简短回顾了认知语言学框架下有关文学隐喻的前人研究之后,介绍了神经美学(Semir Zeki,2001 年;Vilayanur Ramachandran,2003 年)--一门新兴的实证学科--的主要原则,并将其引用到视觉艺术研究中。然后,比较了这两个领域的见解,并将其应用于隐喻研究。研究结果表明,神经科学的实证研究似乎证实了认知语言学家提出的理论和假设,如如何激发对诗歌隐喻的情感反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信