Effects of bandage types on interface pressure in static positions and during walking

D. Rimaud, Ahmed El-Aouadi, P. Calmels, R. Convert
{"title":"Effects of bandage types on interface pressure in static positions and during walking","authors":"D. Rimaud, Ahmed El-Aouadi, P. Calmels, R. Convert","doi":"10.1177/00405175241246115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this study was to compare the interface pressure applied by four different compression bandages (two elastic, one inelastic, and one multi-layer system), in various static and dynamic conditions and over time. The second objective was to compare their Static Stiffness Index and their Dynamic Stiffness Index. The compression bandages were applied on 20 legs of healthy females. Interface pressure was measured at two different points of the leg (ankle and calf), at rest in two positions (standing, supine), and during walking sequences. Interface pressure depends mainly on the mechanical properties of compression devices and on the subject morphology. Both elastic and multilayer compression devices exhibited a pressure gradient loss from the ankle to the calf. Over time, pressure loss was higher for inelastic compression bandages ( p < 0.001) than for elastic and multilayer compression systems. Pressure variation from a supine to a standing position, and during walking, was higher for both inelastic bandage and multilayer system, than for elastic bandages ( p < 0.01) whatever the measurement time and the measurement point. For all compression devices, pressure variation during walking at the ankle was about 25% of the pressure variation when switching from a supine to a standing position. These results provide a better understanding of the behavior of various bandage types. The pressure variations measured during walking are lower than those obtained when the subject switches from a supine to a standing position. This study suggests that the efficacy of compression bandages relies on the interface pressure that they exert on the legs, and the capacity of the patient to walk, which activates calf muscle.","PeriodicalId":505915,"journal":{"name":"Textile Research Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textile Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175241246115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to compare the interface pressure applied by four different compression bandages (two elastic, one inelastic, and one multi-layer system), in various static and dynamic conditions and over time. The second objective was to compare their Static Stiffness Index and their Dynamic Stiffness Index. The compression bandages were applied on 20 legs of healthy females. Interface pressure was measured at two different points of the leg (ankle and calf), at rest in two positions (standing, supine), and during walking sequences. Interface pressure depends mainly on the mechanical properties of compression devices and on the subject morphology. Both elastic and multilayer compression devices exhibited a pressure gradient loss from the ankle to the calf. Over time, pressure loss was higher for inelastic compression bandages ( p < 0.001) than for elastic and multilayer compression systems. Pressure variation from a supine to a standing position, and during walking, was higher for both inelastic bandage and multilayer system, than for elastic bandages ( p < 0.01) whatever the measurement time and the measurement point. For all compression devices, pressure variation during walking at the ankle was about 25% of the pressure variation when switching from a supine to a standing position. These results provide a better understanding of the behavior of various bandage types. The pressure variations measured during walking are lower than those obtained when the subject switches from a supine to a standing position. This study suggests that the efficacy of compression bandages relies on the interface pressure that they exert on the legs, and the capacity of the patient to walk, which activates calf muscle.
绷带类型对静态和行走时界面压力的影响
这项研究的主要目的是比较四种不同压力绷带(两种弹性绷带、一种非弹性绷带和一种多层绷带)在各种静态和动态条件下以及随着时间的推移所产生的界面压力。第二个目的是比较它们的静态刚度指数和动态刚度指数。将压力绷带绑在 20 名健康女性的腿上。在腿部的两个不同点(脚踝和小腿)、两种姿势(站立和仰卧)的静止状态以及行走过程中测量了界面压力。界面压力主要取决于加压装置的机械性能和受试者的形态。弹性和多层压力装置都表现出从脚踝到小腿的压力梯度损失。随着时间的推移,无弹性压力绷带的压力损失(p < 0.001)高于弹性和多层压力系统。无论测量时间和测量点如何,从仰卧位到站立位以及行走时的压力变化,无弹性绷带和多层压力系统均高于弹性绷带(P < 0.01)。对于所有加压装置,行走时脚踝处的压力变化约为从仰卧位转换到站立位时压力变化的 25%。这些结果让我们更好地了解了不同类型绷带的特性。行走时测得的压力变化低于受试者从仰卧位转换到站立位时的压力变化。这项研究表明,压力绷带的功效取决于绷带对腿部施加的界面压力,以及患者行走时激活小腿肌肉的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信