Hydrodynamic simulations of cool stellar atmospheres with MANCHA

A. Perdomo García, N. Vitas, E. Khomenko, M. Collados
{"title":"Hydrodynamic simulations of cool stellar atmospheres with MANCHA","authors":"A. Perdomo García, N. Vitas, E. Khomenko, M. Collados","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202449151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three-dimensional time-dependent simulations of stellar atmospheres are essential to study the surface of stars other than the Sun. These simulations require the opacity binning method to reduce the computational cost of solving the radiative transfer equation down to viable limits. \n The method depends on a series of free parameters, among which the location and number of bins are key to set the accuracy of the resulting opacity. Our aim is to test how different binning strategies previously studied in one-dimensional models perform in three-dimensional radiative hydrodynamic simulations of stellar atmospheres. Realistic box-in-a-star simulations of the near-surface convection and photosphere of three spectral types (G2V, K0V, and M2V) were run with the MANCHA $-bins. These rates were compared with the ones computed with opacity distribution functions. \n Then, stellar simulations were run with grey, four-bin, and 18-bin opacities to see the impact of the opacity setup on the mean stratification of the temperature and its gradient after time evolution. The simulations of main sequence cool stars with the MANCHA code are consistent with those in the literature. \n For the three stars, the radiative energy exchange rates computed with 18 bins are remarkably close to the ones computed with the opacity distribution functions. The rates computed with four bins are similar to the rates computed with 18 bins, and present a significant improvement with respect to the rates computed with the Rosseland opacity, especially above the stellar surface. The Rosseland mean can reproduce the proper rates in sub-surface layers, but produces large errors for the atmospheric layers of the G2V and K0V stars. In the case of the M2V star, the Rosseland mean fails even in sub-surface layers, owing to the importance of the contribution from molecular lines in the opacity, underestimated by the harmonic mean. Similar conclusions are reached studying the mean stratification of the temperature and its gradient after time evolution.","PeriodicalId":505693,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"29 S90","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-dimensional time-dependent simulations of stellar atmospheres are essential to study the surface of stars other than the Sun. These simulations require the opacity binning method to reduce the computational cost of solving the radiative transfer equation down to viable limits. The method depends on a series of free parameters, among which the location and number of bins are key to set the accuracy of the resulting opacity. Our aim is to test how different binning strategies previously studied in one-dimensional models perform in three-dimensional radiative hydrodynamic simulations of stellar atmospheres. Realistic box-in-a-star simulations of the near-surface convection and photosphere of three spectral types (G2V, K0V, and M2V) were run with the MANCHA $-bins. These rates were compared with the ones computed with opacity distribution functions. Then, stellar simulations were run with grey, four-bin, and 18-bin opacities to see the impact of the opacity setup on the mean stratification of the temperature and its gradient after time evolution. The simulations of main sequence cool stars with the MANCHA code are consistent with those in the literature. For the three stars, the radiative energy exchange rates computed with 18 bins are remarkably close to the ones computed with the opacity distribution functions. The rates computed with four bins are similar to the rates computed with 18 bins, and present a significant improvement with respect to the rates computed with the Rosseland opacity, especially above the stellar surface. The Rosseland mean can reproduce the proper rates in sub-surface layers, but produces large errors for the atmospheric layers of the G2V and K0V stars. In the case of the M2V star, the Rosseland mean fails even in sub-surface layers, owing to the importance of the contribution from molecular lines in the opacity, underestimated by the harmonic mean. Similar conclusions are reached studying the mean stratification of the temperature and its gradient after time evolution.
利用 MANCHA 对冷恒星大气进行流体力学模拟
恒星大气的三维时变模拟对于研究太阳以外的恒星表面至关重要。这些模拟需要使用不透明性分档法,以将求解辐射传递方程的计算成本降低到可行的限度。 这种方法依赖于一系列自由参数,其中分档的位置和数量是设定所得到的不透明度精度的关键。我们的目的是测试之前在一维模型中研究的不同分档策略在恒星大气三维辐射流体力学模拟中的表现。我们使用 MANCHA $ 分选器对三种光谱类型(G2V、K0V 和 M2V)的近表面对流和光球进行了盒中星模拟。这些速率与用不透明度分布函数计算的速率进行了比较。 然后,使用灰度、4-bin 和 18-bin 遮光度进行恒星模拟,以观察遮光度设置对温度平均分层及其时间演化后梯度的影响。用 MANCHA 代码模拟的主序冷星与文献中的结果一致。 对于这三颗恒星,用 18 个分段计算的辐射能量交换率与用不透明度分布函数计算的辐射能量交换率非常接近。用 4 个 bins 计算出的辐射能量交换率与用 18 个 bins 计算出的辐射能量交换率相似,与用 Rosseland 不透明度计算出的辐射能量交换率相比有显著提高,尤其是在恒星表面以上。Rosseland 平均值可以再现次表层的适当速率,但对 G2V 和 K0V 恒星的大气层会产生较大误差。在 M2V 恒星的情况下,由于分子线对不透明度的重要贡献,Rosseland 平均值甚至在次表层也失效了,而谐波平均值却低估了这一点。对温度平均分层及其时间演化梯度的研究也得出了类似的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信