Inocuidad de la acción de abuso del derecho al voto en el derecho societario colombiano

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Juan Antonio Gaviria Gil
{"title":"Inocuidad de la acción de abuso del derecho al voto en el derecho societario colombiano","authors":"Juan Antonio Gaviria Gil","doi":"10.18601/01234366.47.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"La Ley 1258 de 2008 consagra los abusos de voto de mayoría, paridad y minoría, permitiendo demandar la nulidad de decisiones sociales y solicitar perjuicios. Esta norma ha generado una amplia jurisprudencia. Con todo, las victorias de los accionistas oprimidos han sido pírricas, ya que, si bien obtienen la nulidad de ciertas decisiones sociales y una condena monetaria a favor, siguen presos en la compañía e inermes frente a nuevas conductas abusivas. Para que la acción por abuso del derecho al voto sea eficaz, se propone suspender votos del accionista que abusa de ellos u otorgarlos a su víctima.","PeriodicalId":41212,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.47.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

La Ley 1258 de 2008 consagra los abusos de voto de mayoría, paridad y minoría, permitiendo demandar la nulidad de decisiones sociales y solicitar perjuicios. Esta norma ha generado una amplia jurisprudencia. Con todo, las victorias de los accionistas oprimidos han sido pírricas, ya que, si bien obtienen la nulidad de ciertas decisiones sociales y una condena monetaria a favor, siguen presos en la compañía e inermes frente a nuevas conductas abusivas. Para que la acción por abuso del derecho al voto sea eficaz, se propone suspender votos del accionista que abusa de ellos u otorgarlos a su víctima.
哥伦比亚公司法规定的滥用表决权诉讼的无害性
2008 年第 1258 号法律规定了滥用多数、均等和少数表决权的行为,使要求公司决定无效和要求损害赔偿成为可能。这部法律产生了大量判例。然而,受压迫的股东们所取得的胜利是惨痛的,因为尽管他们获得了某些公司决定的无效性以及对他们有利的金钱判决,但他们仍然被囚禁在公司中,面对新的滥用行为无能为力。为了使滥用投票权的诉讼有效,建议暂停滥用投票权的股东的投票权,或将其投票权给予受害者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Derecho Privado is a semi-annual publication that compiles the results of the investigative efforts, researches and articles written by professors and jurists from national and foreign universities, that are of interest to the legal community. The journal touches on subjects of private law, with special consideration to its development within the traditional roman domain, in order to make evident the contrasts and similarities between the Latin American and European legal systems, without overlooking, of course, the required confrontation, which today is a must, with the so-called the Anglo-American law. The purpose of the journal is to encourage debates within the legal science and promote dialog among legal sources; due to its determination to address issues from a comparative law perspective, the journal has international applications also with the objective to promote debates among scholars of diverse fields. The journal, available to the scientific and academic community (teachers, researchers and students) and members of the legal practice (lawyers, judges, public servants, and legal professions in general), is addressed to all legal professionals who, either from the point of view of theory or practice, seek to deepen their knowledge of Private Law, starting from its romanist foundations and arriving to the identification of an own Latin American system which can be compared with the European system and even with the common law systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信