English Vocabulary Learning Strategies between High-achievers and Low-achievers

Daoyu Huang, Xiaoqing Zhang, Yuanyuan Guan
{"title":"English Vocabulary Learning Strategies between High-achievers and Low-achievers","authors":"Daoyu Huang, Xiaoqing Zhang, Yuanyuan Guan","doi":"10.5430/elr.v13n1p26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study intends to compare the vocabulary learning strategies between high-achievers and low-achievers in junior high schools, and thus to explore effective vocabulary learning strategies to provide suggestions for English vocabulary teaching and learning practice. It is found out that high-achievers apply English vocabulary learning strategies more frequently than low-achieving students do. More specifically, in terms of meta-cognitive strategies, low-achievers use more pre-planning strategies, while high-achievers apply more selective attention strategies. For cognitive strategies, both high-achievers and low-achievers tend to use repetition strategies. Achievers are better at categorizing what they have learnt than low-achievers. For affective strategies, low-achievers apply reference books strategies most frequently and neither type of students uses authentic material strategies very often. Students’ beliefs, habits and attitudes towards vocabulary learning affect the application of strategies to some extent. High-achievers are better at utilizing the environment and even creating opportunities for English communication than underachievers. In addition, high-achievers have stronger learning motivation and they are also better at setting and achieving goals than low-achievers.","PeriodicalId":475057,"journal":{"name":"English Linguistics Research","volume":"99 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Linguistics Research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v13n1p26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study intends to compare the vocabulary learning strategies between high-achievers and low-achievers in junior high schools, and thus to explore effective vocabulary learning strategies to provide suggestions for English vocabulary teaching and learning practice. It is found out that high-achievers apply English vocabulary learning strategies more frequently than low-achieving students do. More specifically, in terms of meta-cognitive strategies, low-achievers use more pre-planning strategies, while high-achievers apply more selective attention strategies. For cognitive strategies, both high-achievers and low-achievers tend to use repetition strategies. Achievers are better at categorizing what they have learnt than low-achievers. For affective strategies, low-achievers apply reference books strategies most frequently and neither type of students uses authentic material strategies very often. Students’ beliefs, habits and attitudes towards vocabulary learning affect the application of strategies to some extent. High-achievers are better at utilizing the environment and even creating opportunities for English communication than underachievers. In addition, high-achievers have stronger learning motivation and they are also better at setting and achieving goals than low-achievers.
高分学生和低分学生的英语词汇学习策略
本研究意在比较初中高分学生和低分学生的词汇学习策略,从而探索有效的词汇学习策略,为英语词汇教学和学习实践提供建议。研究发现,成绩好的学生比成绩差的学生更频繁地运用英语词汇学习策略。具体而言,在元认知策略方面,低成绩学生使用更多的预习策略,而高成绩学生则使用更多的选择性注意策略。在认知策略方面,高分学生和低分学生都倾向于使用重复策略。学习成绩好的学生比学习成绩差的学生更善于对所学知识进行分类。在情感策略方面,成绩差的学生最经常使用参考书策略,而这两类学生都不经常使用真实材料策略。学生对词汇学习的信念、习惯和态度在一定程度上影响了策略的应用。成绩好的学生比成绩差的学生更善于利用环境,甚至创造英语交流的机会。此外,学习成绩好的学生有更强的学习动机,他们也比学习成绩差的学生更善于设定和实现目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信