‘We’re not right-wing or racist but…’: Far-right myth and distributive conflict in asylum seeker related protest in the Republic of Ireland, November 2022–July 2023

Q2 Social Sciences
Barry Cannon, Shane Murphy
{"title":"‘We’re not right-wing or racist but…’: Far-right myth and distributive conflict in asylum seeker related protest in the Republic of Ireland, November 2022–July 2023","authors":"Barry Cannon, Shane Murphy","doi":"10.1177/07916035241259252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Republic of Ireland has seen numerous protests around asylum seeker accommodation since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with noted involvement of the far right. But what are protestors actually demanding? And how do they feel about far-right involvement in such protests? This article is based on quotes found in 144 media articles, published between November 2022 and July 2023, from people protesting in support of and against asylum seeker accommodation in the State. It finds that among those protesting against such accommodation, complaints about security, access to services and lack of consultation predominate. Nevertheless, many such protestors repeat common far-right racist and xenophobic tropes while simultaneously distancing themselves from the far right. Similarly, those supporting asylum seeker accommodation reject the far right while recognising the validity of many of the structural and political complaints of those who protest against asylum seekers. Based on this analysis, we suggest that such apparently dichotomous thinking among protestors deserves further research scrutiny, particularly, with regard to difficulties in disentangling far-right-inspired racist and xenophobic tropes from legitimate grievances around structural and resource issues.","PeriodicalId":52497,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Sociology","volume":"17 2‐3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035241259252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Republic of Ireland has seen numerous protests around asylum seeker accommodation since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with noted involvement of the far right. But what are protestors actually demanding? And how do they feel about far-right involvement in such protests? This article is based on quotes found in 144 media articles, published between November 2022 and July 2023, from people protesting in support of and against asylum seeker accommodation in the State. It finds that among those protesting against such accommodation, complaints about security, access to services and lack of consultation predominate. Nevertheless, many such protestors repeat common far-right racist and xenophobic tropes while simultaneously distancing themselves from the far right. Similarly, those supporting asylum seeker accommodation reject the far right while recognising the validity of many of the structural and political complaints of those who protest against asylum seekers. Based on this analysis, we suggest that such apparently dichotomous thinking among protestors deserves further research scrutiny, particularly, with regard to difficulties in disentangling far-right-inspired racist and xenophobic tropes from legitimate grievances around structural and resource issues.
我们不是右翼或种族主义者,但......":极右翼神话与爱尔兰共和国寻求庇护者相关抗议活动中的分配冲突,2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 7 月
自 2022 年 2 月俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以来,爱尔兰共和国发生了多起围绕寻求庇护者住宿问题的抗议活动,其中不乏极右翼分子的参与。但抗议者们究竟要求什么?他们对极右翼参与此类抗议活动有何看法?本文基于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 7 月间发表的 144 篇媒体文章中的引文,这些引文来自支持和反对在该国安置寻求庇护者的抗议者。文章发现,在抗议国家收容寻求庇护者的人群中,对安全、获得服务和缺乏咨询的抱怨占多数。然而,许多此类抗议者在重复极右种族主义和仇外心理的惯用伎俩的同时,也在撇清自己与极右势力的关系。同样,那些支持收容寻求庇护者的人在拒绝极右派的同时,也承认那些抗议寻求庇护者的人所抱怨的许多结构性和政治性问题的合理性。基于以上分析,我们认为,抗议者中这种明显的二元对立思维值得进一步研究,特别是在将极右翼煽动的种族主义和仇外情绪与围绕结构性和资源性问题的合理不满区分开来方面存在的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Sociology
Irish Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信