Dentinal Crack Formation and Quality of Obturation Using Two Single File Systems and Two Obturation Techniques: A micro-CT Study.

Shaban Shaban Omar, B. Selivany
{"title":"Dentinal Crack Formation and Quality of Obturation Using Two Single File Systems and Two Obturation Techniques: A micro-CT Study.","authors":"Shaban Shaban Omar, B. Selivany","doi":"10.15218/edj.2024.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Root canal preparation following obturation with rotary instruments and different obturation techniques may lead to formation of microcracks in the root canal wall, void and gaps between the canal wall and obturation material. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate dentinal microcracks and voids formation after using two different files TruNatomy (TRN) and Genius (GN) and two obturation techniques Single Cone (SC) and GuttaCore (GC) using Microcomputed tomography scan (micro-CT). Methods: 40 extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated, leaving 13mm roots. The roots were randomly divided into two main groups TRN and GN ((n=20)) according to instrumentation, afterwards each group subdivided into two subgroups ((n=10)) according to obturation techniques. The root canals instrumented with TRN and GN file and obturated with Single Cone (SC) and GuttaCore (GC) obturation techniques. AH Plus sealer was used in all groups. The specimens were scanned with Micro-CT before and after root canal preparation and after obturation. subsequently, all pre-and postoperative cross-sectional images of the roots were screened to identify the presence of dentinal defects. Furthermore, the percentage of voids volume calculated. Data were analyzed statistically to determine difference between groups, the level of statistical significance was at p < 0.05. Results: GN revealed the least number of microcracks. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of dentinal microcracks. The highest percentage of filling material was observed in GC groups. There were significant differences between the obturation groups in the number of voids present after obturation (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The instrumentation of root canals induces dentinal microcracks. Obturation have no effect on the formation of cracks. None of the root canal filling procedures yield fillings that are void-free. Keywords: Dentinal crack, Voids, Micro CT, Guttacore, Singlecone, TruNatomy, Genius.","PeriodicalId":257297,"journal":{"name":"Erbil Dental Journal","volume":"61 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erbil Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15218/edj.2024.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Root canal preparation following obturation with rotary instruments and different obturation techniques may lead to formation of microcracks in the root canal wall, void and gaps between the canal wall and obturation material. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate dentinal microcracks and voids formation after using two different files TruNatomy (TRN) and Genius (GN) and two obturation techniques Single Cone (SC) and GuttaCore (GC) using Microcomputed tomography scan (micro-CT). Methods: 40 extracted mandibular premolars were decoronated, leaving 13mm roots. The roots were randomly divided into two main groups TRN and GN ((n=20)) according to instrumentation, afterwards each group subdivided into two subgroups ((n=10)) according to obturation techniques. The root canals instrumented with TRN and GN file and obturated with Single Cone (SC) and GuttaCore (GC) obturation techniques. AH Plus sealer was used in all groups. The specimens were scanned with Micro-CT before and after root canal preparation and after obturation. subsequently, all pre-and postoperative cross-sectional images of the roots were screened to identify the presence of dentinal defects. Furthermore, the percentage of voids volume calculated. Data were analyzed statistically to determine difference between groups, the level of statistical significance was at p < 0.05. Results: GN revealed the least number of microcracks. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of dentinal microcracks. The highest percentage of filling material was observed in GC groups. There were significant differences between the obturation groups in the number of voids present after obturation (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The instrumentation of root canals induces dentinal microcracks. Obturation have no effect on the formation of cracks. None of the root canal filling procedures yield fillings that are void-free. Keywords: Dentinal crack, Voids, Micro CT, Guttacore, Singlecone, TruNatomy, Genius.
使用两种单锉系统和两种咬合技术的牙本质裂缝形成和咬合质量:显微 CT 研究
背景和目的:使用旋转器械和不同的封固技术进行根管预备后,可能会导致根管壁形成微裂缝、空隙以及根管壁与封固材料之间的间隙。目的:本研究旨在利用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估在使用 TruNatomy(TRN)和 Genius(GN)两种不同的根管锉以及 Single Cone(SC)和 GuttaCore(GC)两种充填技术后牙本质微裂缝和空隙的形成情况。方法:对 40 颗拔出的下颌前磨牙进行装饰,留下 13 毫米的牙根。根据根管器械的不同随机分为 TRN 和 GN 两大组(20 人),然后每组又根据封闭技术的不同分为两个亚组(10 人)。使用 TRN 和 GN 文件器械的根管采用单锥(SC)和 GuttaCore(GC)封塞技术进行封塞。所有组别均使用 AH Plus 封闭剂。在根管预备前后和封固后,用 Micro-CT 对样本进行扫描。随后,对所有术前和术后的牙根横截面图像进行筛选,以确定是否存在牙本质缺损。此外,还计算了空洞体积的百分比。对数据进行统计分析以确定组间差异,统计显著性水平为 p <0.05。结果GN 发现的微裂缝最少。各组在牙本质微裂缝的发生率上没有明显差异。GC 组的填充材料比例最高。各遮盖组在遮盖后出现的空隙数量上存在明显差异(P < 0.001)。结论根管器械操作会诱发牙本质微裂缝。封闭对裂缝的形成没有影响。任何一种根管充填术都不会产生无空隙的充填物。关键词牙本质裂纹 空洞 显微 CT Guttacore Singlecone TruNatomy Genius
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信