What Does the Archaeomagnetic Record of Fired Ceramics Reflect?

O. V. Pilipenko, G.  P. Markov, N. Salnaya, P. A. Minaev, N. A. Aphinogenova
{"title":"What Does the Archaeomagnetic Record of Fired Ceramics Reflect?","authors":"O. V. Pilipenko, G.  P. Markov, N. Salnaya, P. A. Minaev, N. A. Aphinogenova","doi":"10.31857/s0002333724030077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A complex of archaeomagnetic and rock-magnetic studies is conducted to compare the archaeomagnetic intensity determined by the Thellier–Coe and Wilson methods with the known “true” value of the geomagnetic field during the firing of the ceramic samples manufactured on February 21, 2017 in Myshkin, Yaroslavl region, Russia. \nThe obtained results show two different values of archaeomagnetic intensity corresponding to two temperature intervals. The values obtained in the low-temperature interval (∼150–350°C) are approximately 13 µT lower than the true value, while the values obtained in the interval of ∼350–600°C are fairly close to the “true” ones. The cause of the phenomenon is likely due to the presence of small magnetic grains in the ceramic under study, which are close in size to superparamagnetic ones and are capable of resuming their growth upon heating and reaching the particle sizes in a single-domain state. \nThe results of rock-magnetic studies suggest that thermoremanent magnetization in the studied ceramics is carried by grains of oxidized magnetite, hematite, and possibly ε-Fe2O3.","PeriodicalId":134429,"journal":{"name":"Физика Земли","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Физика Земли","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s0002333724030077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A complex of archaeomagnetic and rock-magnetic studies is conducted to compare the archaeomagnetic intensity determined by the Thellier–Coe and Wilson methods with the known “true” value of the geomagnetic field during the firing of the ceramic samples manufactured on February 21, 2017 in Myshkin, Yaroslavl region, Russia. The obtained results show two different values of archaeomagnetic intensity corresponding to two temperature intervals. The values obtained in the low-temperature interval (∼150–350°C) are approximately 13 µT lower than the true value, while the values obtained in the interval of ∼350–600°C are fairly close to the “true” ones. The cause of the phenomenon is likely due to the presence of small magnetic grains in the ceramic under study, which are close in size to superparamagnetic ones and are capable of resuming their growth upon heating and reaching the particle sizes in a single-domain state. The results of rock-magnetic studies suggest that thermoremanent magnetization in the studied ceramics is carried by grains of oxidized magnetite, hematite, and possibly ε-Fe2O3.
烧制陶瓷的考古磁记录反映了什么?
为了比较 2017 年 2 月 21 日在俄罗斯雅罗斯拉夫尔地区 Myshkin 制造的陶瓷样品烧制过程中通过 Thellier-Coe 和 Wilson 方法确定的考古磁场强度与已知的地磁场 "真实 "值,进行了考古磁场和岩石磁场的综合研究。获得的结果显示了与两个温度区间相对应的两种不同的考古地磁强度值。在低温区间(150-350°C)获得的值比真实值低约 13 µT,而在∼350-600°C区间获得的值相当接近 "真实 "值。造成这种现象的原因可能是所研究的陶瓷中存在小磁粒,这些小磁粒的尺寸接近超顺磁性磁粒,在加热后能够恢复生长,并达到单域状态下的颗粒尺寸。岩磁研究结果表明,所研究陶瓷中的热永磁是由氧化磁铁矿、赤铁矿和可能的 ε-Fe2O3 晶粒携带的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信