Acute back pain: clinical and radiological diagnosis. Guidelines of the WFNS Spine Committee

A. Gushcha, A. R. Yusupova, R. Kartavykh
{"title":"Acute back pain: clinical and radiological diagnosis. Guidelines of the WFNS Spine Committee","authors":"A. Gushcha, A. R. Yusupova, R. Kartavykh","doi":"10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-2-91-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To propose the list of guidelines of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee on clinical and radiological diagnosis of acute back pain.Materials and methods. Systematic literature search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases between 2012 and 2022 using keywords “acute back pain AND clinical diagnosis” and “acute back pain AND radiologic diagnosis” was performed. In total, 97 articles were analyzed, and the WFNS Spine Committee organized 2 consensus meetings to propose specific guidelines. The first meeting took place in May of 2022 in Karachi (Pakistan), the second during the Congress of the Middle East Spine Society in September of 2022 in Istanbul (Turkey). To formulate the guidelines, both meetings used the Delphi method of voting on the preliminary statements proposed based on the evidence level‑stratified literature search.Results and discussion. In total, 10 statements were put to vote. Clinical characteristics allowing to distinguish between acute and chronic pain were indicated. A trend towards instrumental hyperdiagnosis of back pain was observed but routine neuroimaging does not have clinical benefit in acute back pain, it can even have a negative effect.Conclusion. Acute back pain is hard to diagnose both clinically and radiologically. A patient with primary acute back pain should not be prescribed radiological exams in the absence of “red flags”. There are specific indications for specific radiological exams. The gold standard of diagnosis is magnetic resonance imaging which is confirmed by high‑quality studies.","PeriodicalId":197162,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1683-3295-2024-26-2-91-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. To propose the list of guidelines of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee on clinical and radiological diagnosis of acute back pain.Materials and methods. Systematic literature search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases between 2012 and 2022 using keywords “acute back pain AND clinical diagnosis” and “acute back pain AND radiologic diagnosis” was performed. In total, 97 articles were analyzed, and the WFNS Spine Committee organized 2 consensus meetings to propose specific guidelines. The first meeting took place in May of 2022 in Karachi (Pakistan), the second during the Congress of the Middle East Spine Society in September of 2022 in Istanbul (Turkey). To formulate the guidelines, both meetings used the Delphi method of voting on the preliminary statements proposed based on the evidence level‑stratified literature search.Results and discussion. In total, 10 statements were put to vote. Clinical characteristics allowing to distinguish between acute and chronic pain were indicated. A trend towards instrumental hyperdiagnosis of back pain was observed but routine neuroimaging does not have clinical benefit in acute back pain, it can even have a negative effect.Conclusion. Acute back pain is hard to diagnose both clinically and radiologically. A patient with primary acute back pain should not be prescribed radiological exams in the absence of “red flags”. There are specific indications for specific radiological exams. The gold standard of diagnosis is magnetic resonance imaging which is confirmed by high‑quality studies.
急性背痛:临床和放射学诊断。WFNS 脊柱委员会指南
目的提出世界神经外科学会联合会(WFNS)脊柱委员会关于急性背痛临床和放射学诊断的指南清单。使用关键词 "急性背痛与临床诊断 "和 "急性背痛与放射学诊断",在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库中对 2012 年至 2022 年间的文献进行系统检索。共分析了 97 篇文章,WFNS 脊柱委员会组织了两次共识会议,提出了具体的指南。第一次会议于 2022 年 5 月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇举行,第二次会议于 2022 年 9 月在土耳其伊斯坦布尔举行的中东脊柱学会大会期间举行。为了制定指南,两次会议都采用了德尔菲法,对根据循证分级文献检索提出的初步声明进行投票表决。共对 10 项声明进行了投票。会议指出了可区分急性疼痛和慢性疼痛的临床特征。观察到背痛的工具性过度诊断趋势,但常规神经影像学检查对急性背痛并无临床益处,甚至会产生负面影响。急性背痛在临床和影像学上都很难诊断。原发性急性背痛患者不应在没有 "信号灯 "的情况下接受放射检查。特定的放射检查有特定的适应症。诊断的金标准是磁共振成像,并通过高质量的研究加以确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信