Manometric profile of patients presented with dysphagia – A hospital-based descriptive study

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
P. Yogisparan, P. Arun, S. Vijayabaskaran, Vidhya Sairam, K. Deepalakshmi, S. Mukundan, P. Thirumal, R. Vasanthi, L. Venkatakrishnan
{"title":"Manometric profile of patients presented with dysphagia – A hospital-based descriptive study","authors":"P. Yogisparan, P. Arun, S. Vijayabaskaran, Vidhya Sairam, K. Deepalakshmi, S. Mukundan, P. Thirumal, R. Vasanthi, L. Venkatakrishnan","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_9_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe prevalence of dysphagia is 16–22%. Achalasia is characterised by impaired relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and absent oesophageal peristalsis. Minimally invasive procedures, endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are treatments of choice. We aimed to assess the manometric profile of patients presented with dysphagia and pre- and post-LES pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) of patients who underwent PD and POEM.\n\n\n\nOne hundred and twenty-nine patients presented with dysphagia underwent high resolution oesophageal manometry (HREM). Manometric parameters: IRP, LES and pattern of motility were noted. According to Chicago classification 4.0, those who are diagnosed with achalasia underwent PD (17) and POEM (15). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 28. Pre- and post-procedure values (IRP and basal LES) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.\n\n\n\nOut of 129 patients with dysphagia, 57 had increased IRP and 75 had simultaneous motility. The mean LES pressure and IRP were found to be 28 ± 19.82 and 17 ± 14.04 mmHg, respectively. On analysis, of patients who underwent procedures PD (17) and POEM (15), a statistically significant decrease in IRP was observed in patients with post POEM compared to post PD status (P = 0.005 and 0.017, respectively). Reduced basal LES pressure was observed in patients with post-POEM status compared to post-PD status, which was not statistically significant.\n\n\n\nAbout 44% of patients presented with dysphagia were diagnosed with achalasia cardia. POEM procedure was found to be more effective compared to pneumatic dilatation.\n","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_9_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of dysphagia is 16–22%. Achalasia is characterised by impaired relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and absent oesophageal peristalsis. Minimally invasive procedures, endoscopic pneumatic balloon dilatation (PD) and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are treatments of choice. We aimed to assess the manometric profile of patients presented with dysphagia and pre- and post-LES pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) of patients who underwent PD and POEM. One hundred and twenty-nine patients presented with dysphagia underwent high resolution oesophageal manometry (HREM). Manometric parameters: IRP, LES and pattern of motility were noted. According to Chicago classification 4.0, those who are diagnosed with achalasia underwent PD (17) and POEM (15). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 28. Pre- and post-procedure values (IRP and basal LES) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Out of 129 patients with dysphagia, 57 had increased IRP and 75 had simultaneous motility. The mean LES pressure and IRP were found to be 28 ± 19.82 and 17 ± 14.04 mmHg, respectively. On analysis, of patients who underwent procedures PD (17) and POEM (15), a statistically significant decrease in IRP was observed in patients with post POEM compared to post PD status (P = 0.005 and 0.017, respectively). Reduced basal LES pressure was observed in patients with post-POEM status compared to post-PD status, which was not statistically significant. About 44% of patients presented with dysphagia were diagnosed with achalasia cardia. POEM procedure was found to be more effective compared to pneumatic dilatation.
吞咽困难患者的人体测量学特征 - 一项医院描述性研究
吞咽困难的发病率为 16-22%。Achalasia 的特点是下食道括约肌(LES)松弛功能受损,食道蠕动减弱。微创手术、内镜下气动球囊扩张术(PD)和口周内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是首选治疗方法。我们的目的是评估吞咽困难患者的测压情况,以及接受气囊扩张术和口腔内镜肌切开术的患者的前后 LES 压力和综合松弛压力(IRP)。测压参数记录了 IRP、LES 和运动模式。根据芝加哥分级 4.0,被诊断为贲门失弛缓症的患者接受了 PD(17)和 POEM(15)检查。统计分析使用社会科学统计软件包 28 版进行。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较了手术前后的数值(IRP和基础LES)。结果发现,平均 LES 压力和 IRP 分别为 28 ± 19.82 mmHg 和 17 ± 14.04 mmHg。经分析,在接受腹腔镜手术(17 例)和腹腔镜胃肠道切除术(15 例)的患者中,腹腔镜胃肠道切除术后患者的 IRP 比腹腔镜手术后患者明显降低(P = 0.005 和 0.017,分别为 0.005 和 0.017)。与贲门失弛缓症术后相比,POEM 术后患者的基础 LES 压力降低,但无统计学意义。与气压扩张术相比,POEM 术更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信