Comparison of active release and post-isometric relaxation techniques on functional performance in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis

Ans Hanif, Sana Hafeez, Tooba Arif, Sidra Habib
{"title":"Comparison of active release and post-isometric relaxation techniques on functional performance in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis","authors":"Ans Hanif, Sana Hafeez, Tooba Arif, Sidra Habib","doi":"10.25259/jmsr_65_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nLateral epicondylitis (LE) occurs as a result of repetitive strain near the place of origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon. This is due to eccentric overload and repetition, causing chronic degeneration of the forearm’s common extensor tendons, which are attached to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. This study aimed to assess the comparative effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and active release techniques (ARTs) on pain inhibition, grip strength, and functional ability among individuals suffering from chronic LE.\n\n\n\nA randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 individuals suffering from chronic LE. All of the subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: PIR method or active release approach. Both groups received 12 sessions over four weeks. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), handheld dynamometer, and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) were used to assess the impacts of therapy before and after treatment sessions.\n\n\n\nThe results showed that the NPRS pain score, strength of the grip, and functional performance all showed substantial differences between the two groups (P < 0.05) as well as within-group differences (P < 0.05).\n\n\n\nThe study concluded that PIR techniques were more effective as compared to ARTs for pain reduction, improved strength of gripping, enhanced functionality, and showed better outcomes in terms of mean difference of NPRS, dynamometer, and PRTEE scoring across the groups.\n","PeriodicalId":503319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","volume":" 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jmsr_65_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) occurs as a result of repetitive strain near the place of origin of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon. This is due to eccentric overload and repetition, causing chronic degeneration of the forearm’s common extensor tendons, which are attached to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. This study aimed to assess the comparative effects of post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and active release techniques (ARTs) on pain inhibition, grip strength, and functional ability among individuals suffering from chronic LE. A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 individuals suffering from chronic LE. All of the subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: PIR method or active release approach. Both groups received 12 sessions over four weeks. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), handheld dynamometer, and patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) were used to assess the impacts of therapy before and after treatment sessions. The results showed that the NPRS pain score, strength of the grip, and functional performance all showed substantial differences between the two groups (P < 0.05) as well as within-group differences (P < 0.05). The study concluded that PIR techniques were more effective as compared to ARTs for pain reduction, improved strength of gripping, enhanced functionality, and showed better outcomes in terms of mean difference of NPRS, dynamometer, and PRTEE scoring across the groups.
比较主动松解和后等长放松技术对慢性外上髁炎患者功能表现的影响
外上髁炎(LE)是由于在肱骨桡侧外上髁肌腱发源地附近反复劳损而引起的。这是由于偏心过载和重复,导致前臂总伸肌腱慢性变性,而这些肌腱附着在肱骨外上髁上。本研究旨在评估等长后放松(PIR)和主动松解技术(ARTs)对慢性伸肌腱退行性变患者的疼痛抑制、握力和功能能力的比较效果。所有受试者都被随机分配到两个治疗组中的一个:PIR法或主动释放法。两组均在四周内接受了 12 次治疗。结果显示,两组患者的疼痛评分、握力和功能表现均有显著差异(P < 0.该研究得出结论,与 ART 相比,PIR 技术在减轻疼痛、改善握力、增强功能方面更有效,并且在各组 NPRS、测力计和 PRTEE 评分的平均差异方面显示出更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信