Band Conditioning Contractions Result in Greater Acute Performance Enhancement When Utilising Contrast Training in Elite Same Day Concurrently Trained Team Sport Athletes

D. Ritchie, Justin Keogh, P. Reaburn, Jon Bartlett
{"title":"Band Conditioning Contractions Result in Greater Acute Performance Enhancement When Utilising Contrast Training in Elite Same Day Concurrently Trained Team Sport Athletes","authors":"D. Ritchie, Justin Keogh, P. Reaburn, Jon Bartlett","doi":"10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of altering conditioning contraction within contrast training on subsequent drop jump performance in the presence of same day concurrent training.  \nMethods: In a randomized crossover design, 8 professional Australian Football athletes completed same day skills/endurance training followed by resistance training utilizing different PAPE conditioning contractions (Strength, Band and Isometric). Conditioning contractions were performed for three sets of 3 repetitions; Strength (box squat, instructed to lift as heavy as possible), Band (band resisted, lower-force/ higher-velocity box squat) and Isometric (3 second maximal isometric quarter squat), with 3 DJ repetitions performed one minute following. Data were analyzed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at P ≤ 0.05) to compare changes in DJ performance to respective baseline for each protocol with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis applied.  \nResults: Compared to baseline, Band protocol resulted in the greatest increase in reactive strength index (RSI) for set 1 (P = 0.029) and 2 (P = 0.007), Stiffness for set 1 (P = 0.041) and 2 (P = 0.015), Mean Power for set 1 (P = 0.002) and 2 (P = 0.040), and Peak Power for set 1 (P = 0.002). Isometric increased RSI (P = 0.023) and Stiffness (P = 0.018) for set 1 only and Strength showed no improvement.  \nConclusion: Practitioners working with athletes undertaking same day concurrent training should consider alternate modes of conditioning contraction such as Band conditioning contractions when prescribing contrast training to elicit a PAPE response.","PeriodicalId":170948,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Strength and Conditioning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v4i1.292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of altering conditioning contraction within contrast training on subsequent drop jump performance in the presence of same day concurrent training.  Methods: In a randomized crossover design, 8 professional Australian Football athletes completed same day skills/endurance training followed by resistance training utilizing different PAPE conditioning contractions (Strength, Band and Isometric). Conditioning contractions were performed for three sets of 3 repetitions; Strength (box squat, instructed to lift as heavy as possible), Band (band resisted, lower-force/ higher-velocity box squat) and Isometric (3 second maximal isometric quarter squat), with 3 DJ repetitions performed one minute following. Data were analyzed by fitting a mixed model (significance was set at P ≤ 0.05) to compare changes in DJ performance to respective baseline for each protocol with Dunnett’s post hoc analysis applied.  Results: Compared to baseline, Band protocol resulted in the greatest increase in reactive strength index (RSI) for set 1 (P = 0.029) and 2 (P = 0.007), Stiffness for set 1 (P = 0.041) and 2 (P = 0.015), Mean Power for set 1 (P = 0.002) and 2 (P = 0.040), and Peak Power for set 1 (P = 0.002). Isometric increased RSI (P = 0.023) and Stiffness (P = 0.018) for set 1 only and Strength showed no improvement.  Conclusion: Practitioners working with athletes undertaking same day concurrent training should consider alternate modes of conditioning contraction such as Band conditioning contractions when prescribing contrast training to elicit a PAPE response.
当日同时接受训练的团队运动精英运动员利用对比训练进行带状调节收缩时,可显著提高急性运动能力
目的:本研究旨在评估在当天同时进行训练的情况下,在对比训练中改变调节收缩对后续跳落成绩的影响。 研究方法在随机交叉设计中,8 名专业澳式足球运动员在完成当天的技能/耐力训练后,利用不同的 PAPE 调节收缩(力量、束带和等距)进行阻力训练。训练收缩分为三组,每组重复 3 次;力量(箱式深蹲,要求尽可能举起重物)、束带(束带阻力、低力/高速箱式深蹲)和等长(3 秒钟最大等长四分之一深蹲),一分钟后进行 3 次 DJ 重复。通过拟合混合模型(显著性设定为 P ≤ 0.05)分析数据,比较每个方案的 DJ 成绩与各自基线的变化,并进行邓尼特事后分析。 结果:与基线相比,带式训练方案使第 1 组(P = 0.029)和第 2 组(P = 0.007)的反应性力量指数(RSI)、第 1 组(P = 0.041)和第 2 组(P = 0.015)的僵硬度、第 1 组(P = 0.002)和第 2 组(P = 0.040)的平均力量以及第 1 组(P = 0.002)的峰值力量增加最多。等长训练仅提高了第一组的 RSI(P = 0.023)和僵硬度(P = 0.018),而力量没有改善。 结论在对运动员进行同日同步训练时,教练员应考虑采用其他调节收缩模式,例如带状调节收缩,以引起 PAPE 反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信