Collaborative work as a pedagogical strategy to favor the school coexistence of children

IF 3.2 2区 哲学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Minerva Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.47460/minerva.v5i14.162
Veronica Rocio Garcia Vera, Geilert De la Pena Consuegra
{"title":"Collaborative work as a pedagogical strategy to favor the school coexistence of children","authors":"Veronica Rocio Garcia Vera, Geilert De la Pena Consuegra","doi":"10.47460/minerva.v5i14.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to promote collaborative work as a pedagogical strategy to foster school coexistence in a group of three-year-old children. A mixed methodology was employed, with a pre-experimental longitudinal design of 36 children. An observation sheet was applied before and afterimplementing the pedagogical strategy over five weeks. The results were analyzed through statistical techniques, using the T-Student hypothesis test processed in the statistical software SPSS version 0.25. The main findings reveal statistically significant differences in school coexistence when comparing the means of pre-experimentation (M=52.08) and post-experimentation (M=59.36). It can be asserted that the work positively impacted the children's school coexistence, improving their social and cognitive skills. It is recommended to continue exploring collaborative approaches to promote harmonious environments from the early stages.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47460/minerva.v5i14.162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to promote collaborative work as a pedagogical strategy to foster school coexistence in a group of three-year-old children. A mixed methodology was employed, with a pre-experimental longitudinal design of 36 children. An observation sheet was applied before and afterimplementing the pedagogical strategy over five weeks. The results were analyzed through statistical techniques, using the T-Student hypothesis test processed in the statistical software SPSS version 0.25. The main findings reveal statistically significant differences in school coexistence when comparing the means of pre-experimentation (M=52.08) and post-experimentation (M=59.36). It can be asserted that the work positively impacted the children's school coexistence, improving their social and cognitive skills. It is recommended to continue exploring collaborative approaches to promote harmonious environments from the early stages.
将协作作为有利于儿童在学校共处的教学策略
本研究旨在促进合作学习,将其作为一种教学策略,以培养三岁儿童在学校的共处能力。研究采用了混合方法,对 36 名儿童进行了实验前纵向设计。在五周的时间里,在实施教学策略前后使用了观察表。研究结果通过统计技术进行分析,使用 SPSS 0.25 版统计软件进行 T-Student 假设检验。主要结果显示,实验前(M=52.08)和实验后(M=59.36)的平均值相比,在学校共存方面存在显著的统计学差异。可以断言,这项工作对儿童的学校共处产生了积极影响,提高了他们的社交和认知能力。建议继续探索合作方法,从早期阶段就促进和谐环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva
Minerva Multiple-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Minerva is devoted to the study of ideas, traditions, cultures and institutions in science, higher education and research. It is concerned no less with history than with present practice, and with the local as well as the global. It speaks to the scholar, the teacher, the policy-maker and the administrator. It features articles, essay reviews and ''special'' issues on themes of topical importance. It represents no single school of thought, but welcomes diversity, within the rules of rational discourse. Its contributions are peer-reviewed. Its audience is world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信