Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of manual anastomosis use of its own modernization in the rectum anterior resection

S. G. Gaydarov, Z. Mamedli, Z. Dudaev, D. M. Pugaev, Ch. M. Mongush
{"title":"Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of manual anastomosis use of its own modernization in the rectum anterior resection","authors":"S. G. Gaydarov, Z. Mamedli, Z. Dudaev, D. M. Pugaev, Ch. M. Mongush","doi":"10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-26-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The choice of optimal method of colorectal anastomosis formation remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study is to assess safety of an original method of forming a manual colorectal anastomosis.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included patients having rectal cancer with tumor localization above 5 cm from the anocutaneous line, who underwent anterior resection of the rectum with formation of a manual “side-to-end” anastomosis of own modification. The main parameter evaluated was frequency of anastomotic failure and the additional one was overall incidence of postoperative complications.Results. The study included 31 patients, among them were 15 (48.4 %) men, 18 (58.1 %) of them were older than 50 years, 9 (29 %) were smokers, 17 (54.8 %) had a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 . Anastomosis failure developed n 2 (6.5 %) patients and only 1 (3.2 %) patient required a second surgery.Conclusion. Preliminary analysis data indicate safety of the proposed method of colorectal anastomosis formation. It is necessary to conduct comparative studies to evaluate possibility of wider implementation of this technique in clinical practice. ","PeriodicalId":509681,"journal":{"name":"Surgery and Oncology","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-26-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The choice of optimal method of colorectal anastomosis formation remains a matter of debate. The purpose of this study is to assess safety of an original method of forming a manual colorectal anastomosis.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included patients having rectal cancer with tumor localization above 5 cm from the anocutaneous line, who underwent anterior resection of the rectum with formation of a manual “side-to-end” anastomosis of own modification. The main parameter evaluated was frequency of anastomotic failure and the additional one was overall incidence of postoperative complications.Results. The study included 31 patients, among them were 15 (48.4 %) men, 18 (58.1 %) of them were older than 50 years, 9 (29 %) were smokers, 17 (54.8 %) had a body mass index greater than 25 kg/m2 . Anastomosis failure developed n 2 (6.5 %) patients and only 1 (3.2 %) patient required a second surgery.Conclusion. Preliminary analysis data indicate safety of the proposed method of colorectal anastomosis formation. It is necessary to conduct comparative studies to evaluate possibility of wider implementation of this technique in clinical practice. 
评估在直肠前切除术中利用自身现代化技术进行人工吻合的有效性和安全性
目的。选择最佳的结直肠吻合术方法仍是一个争论不休的问题。本研究的目的是评估一种原创的人工结直肠吻合术形成方法的安全性。这项回顾性研究的对象包括直肠癌患者,其肿瘤位置距离肛门线超过 5 厘米,这些患者接受了直肠前端切除术,并通过自己的改良形成了 "侧对端 "人工吻合术。评估的主要参数是吻合失败的频率,另外一个参数是术后并发症的总发生率。该研究共纳入 31 名患者,其中 15 名(48.4%)为男性,18 名(58.1%)年龄在 50 岁以上,9 名(29%)为吸烟者,17 名(54.8%)体重指数大于 25 kg/m2。吻合失败的患者有 2 人(6.5%),只有 1 人(3.2%)需要进行第二次手术。初步分析数据表明,拟议的结肠直肠吻合术是安全的。有必要进行比较研究,以评估在临床实践中更广泛地采用这种技术的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信