Representing Scotland: Conservative narratives of nation, union, and Scottish independence

Coree Brown Swan, Paul Anderson
{"title":"Representing Scotland: Conservative narratives of nation, union, and Scottish independence","authors":"Coree Brown Swan, Paul Anderson","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2024.1392346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Kingdom’s vote to exit the European Union reignited the debate about Scottish independence, requiring statewide political parties to rearticulate the case for the Union. The UK Conservative Party, as the party of government and one with a tumultuous history vis-à-vis Scotland and devolution, was at the fore in making this case. This article explores representations of Scotland, its position within the United Kingdom, and Scottish nationalism as a political force by the Conservative Party at a prolonged moment of significant political and constitutional tension. We focus, therefore, on 2019 to 2024, a parliamentary term and political period defined by protracted debates on Scotland’s place within the Union, playing out against the backdrop of the Brexit negotiations, the Covid-19 pandemic, and a worsening cost-of-living crisis. To this end, we draw upon parliamentary debates, two daily English newspapers (The Daily Telegraph and the Sun) and two online right-leaning news sites (ConservativeHome and The Spectator online). Our analysis identifies three distinct but interrelated strands in Conservative representations of Scotland, each of which is centred on a contrast. First, a distinction between an inclusive unionism versus a narrow nationalism; second, a largely economic narrative, contrasting a prosperous union with the economic risks of independence; and finally, a contrast between governmental competence at Westminster and the SNP-led Scottish Government failing Scotland. These contrasting narratives elucidate the ways in which Conservatives construct representations of Scotland, particularly at moments of constitutional contestation.","PeriodicalId":502753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Political Science","volume":" 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1392346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Kingdom’s vote to exit the European Union reignited the debate about Scottish independence, requiring statewide political parties to rearticulate the case for the Union. The UK Conservative Party, as the party of government and one with a tumultuous history vis-à-vis Scotland and devolution, was at the fore in making this case. This article explores representations of Scotland, its position within the United Kingdom, and Scottish nationalism as a political force by the Conservative Party at a prolonged moment of significant political and constitutional tension. We focus, therefore, on 2019 to 2024, a parliamentary term and political period defined by protracted debates on Scotland’s place within the Union, playing out against the backdrop of the Brexit negotiations, the Covid-19 pandemic, and a worsening cost-of-living crisis. To this end, we draw upon parliamentary debates, two daily English newspapers (The Daily Telegraph and the Sun) and two online right-leaning news sites (ConservativeHome and The Spectator online). Our analysis identifies three distinct but interrelated strands in Conservative representations of Scotland, each of which is centred on a contrast. First, a distinction between an inclusive unionism versus a narrow nationalism; second, a largely economic narrative, contrasting a prosperous union with the economic risks of independence; and finally, a contrast between governmental competence at Westminster and the SNP-led Scottish Government failing Scotland. These contrasting narratives elucidate the ways in which Conservatives construct representations of Scotland, particularly at moments of constitutional contestation.
代表苏格兰:保守派关于国家、联盟和苏格兰独立的论述
英国退出欧盟的投票再次引发了关于苏格兰独立的辩论,这要求全国各政党重新阐明苏格兰独立的理由。英国保守党作为执政党,在苏格兰和权力下放问题上历史动荡,因此在提出这一论点时处于领先地位。本文探讨了保守党在长期的政治和宪法紧张局势中对苏格兰、苏格兰在联合王国中的地位以及苏格兰民族主义作为一种政治力量的表述。因此,我们将重点放在 2019 年至 2024 年这一议会任期和政治时期,在这一时期,关于苏格兰在联合王国中地位的辩论旷日持久,其背景是英国脱欧谈判、Covid-19 大流行病和不断恶化的生活费用危机。为此,我们参考了议会辩论、两份英国日报(《每日电讯报》和《太阳报》)以及两家右翼在线新闻网站(ConservativeHome 和 The Spectator online)。我们的分析发现,保守党对苏格兰的表述有三个不同但相互关联的方面,每个方面都以一种对比为中心。首先,是包容性的联盟主义与狭隘的民族主义之间的区别;其次,主要是经济叙事,将繁荣的联盟与独立的经济风险进行对比;最后,是威斯敏斯特政府的能力与苏格兰民族党领导的苏格兰政府在苏格兰的失败之间的对比。这些对比鲜明的叙事阐明了保守党构建苏格兰表象的方式,尤其是在宪法争议的时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信