Exploring Texture and Biomechanics of Food Oral Processing in Fork-Mashable Dishes for Patients with Mastication or Swallowing Impairments

Foods Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.3390/foods13121807
K. Ismael-Mohammed, M. Bolívar-Prados, Laura Laguna, Adrian Nuñez Lara, P. Clavé
{"title":"Exploring Texture and Biomechanics of Food Oral Processing in Fork-Mashable Dishes for Patients with Mastication or Swallowing Impairments","authors":"K. Ismael-Mohammed, M. Bolívar-Prados, Laura Laguna, Adrian Nuñez Lara, P. Clavé","doi":"10.3390/foods13121807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are a primary compensatory treatment for hospitalized older patients with swallowing and mastication disorders. Nevertheless, the lack of a protocol for evaluating their objective textural properties hampers their industrialization and optimal patient care. Objectives: This study aimed (a) to evaluate the textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) and biomechanics of food oral processing (mastication cycles, time, and frequency) of ten fork-mashable dishes (Texture E BDA/IDDSI level 6), (b) to explore the impact of oral processing on texture, and (c) to measure the properties of the ready-to-swallow bolus (RSB) in healthy adults. Methods: The textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) of ten dishes were analyzed with a texture analyzer before and after oral processing (RSB) in five healthy adults (30 ± 3.9, 3 women). Surface electromyography was used to measure mastication cycles, time, and frequency. Results: The pre-mastication Texture Profile Analysis (TPA)-averaged values of maximum force ranged from 0.65 to 2.73 N, cohesiveness was 0.49–0.87, and adhesiveness was 0.01–0.95 N·s. Masticatory Cycles (46.87–19.13 MC) and time (36.73–15.80 S) from whole samples to RSB greatly and significantly differed among dishes, although frequency did not (1.68–1.11 MC/T). Post-mastication RSB TPA-averaged values of maximum force ranged from 0.70 to 2.24 N; cohesiveness, 0.49–0.73; and adhesiveness, 0.01–1.14 N·s. Conclusions: Despite all dishes being classified by the same qualitative descriptor (BDA level E/IDDSI level 6), there was a large and significant variation in their textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) when measured in SI units. In addition, in healthy adults, the masticatory cycles and time to achieve RSB greatly differed, whereas masticatory frequency remained quite constant.","PeriodicalId":502667,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13121807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are a primary compensatory treatment for hospitalized older patients with swallowing and mastication disorders. Nevertheless, the lack of a protocol for evaluating their objective textural properties hampers their industrialization and optimal patient care. Objectives: This study aimed (a) to evaluate the textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) and biomechanics of food oral processing (mastication cycles, time, and frequency) of ten fork-mashable dishes (Texture E BDA/IDDSI level 6), (b) to explore the impact of oral processing on texture, and (c) to measure the properties of the ready-to-swallow bolus (RSB) in healthy adults. Methods: The textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) of ten dishes were analyzed with a texture analyzer before and after oral processing (RSB) in five healthy adults (30 ± 3.9, 3 women). Surface electromyography was used to measure mastication cycles, time, and frequency. Results: The pre-mastication Texture Profile Analysis (TPA)-averaged values of maximum force ranged from 0.65 to 2.73 N, cohesiveness was 0.49–0.87, and adhesiveness was 0.01–0.95 N·s. Masticatory Cycles (46.87–19.13 MC) and time (36.73–15.80 S) from whole samples to RSB greatly and significantly differed among dishes, although frequency did not (1.68–1.11 MC/T). Post-mastication RSB TPA-averaged values of maximum force ranged from 0.70 to 2.24 N; cohesiveness, 0.49–0.73; and adhesiveness, 0.01–1.14 N·s. Conclusions: Despite all dishes being classified by the same qualitative descriptor (BDA level E/IDDSI level 6), there was a large and significant variation in their textural properties (maximum force, cohesiveness, and adhesiveness) when measured in SI units. In addition, in healthy adults, the masticatory cycles and time to achieve RSB greatly differed, whereas masticatory frequency remained quite constant.
为咀嚼或吞咽障碍患者探索叉拌菜肴中食物口腔加工的质地和生物力学原理
质地改良膳食(TMDs)是对患有吞咽和咀嚼障碍的住院老年患者的一种主要补偿治疗方法。然而,由于缺乏对其客观质地特性进行评估的规程,阻碍了其产业化和对患者的最佳护理。研究目的本研究旨在:(a) 评估十种叉拌菜肴(质地 E BDA/IDDSI 6 级)的质地特性(最大力、内聚力和粘附力)和食物口腔加工的生物力学(咀嚼周期、时间和频率);(b) 探讨口腔加工对质地的影响;(c) 测量健康成年人的即吞咽料(RSB)特性。研究方法用质地分析仪分析了五名健康成人(30 ± 3.9,3 名女性)在口腔处理(RSB)前后十种菜肴的质地特性(最大力、内聚力和粘附力)。表面肌电图用于测量咀嚼周期、时间和频率。结果咀嚼前纹理轮廓分析(TPA)的最大力量平均值为 0.65 至 2.73 牛顿,内聚力为 0.49 至 0.87 牛顿,粘着力为 0.01 至 0.95 牛顿-秒。从整个样品到 RSB 的咀嚼周期(46.87-19.13 MC)和时间(36.73-15.80 S)在不同咀嚼盘之间有很大的显著差异,但频率没有显著差异(1.68-1.11 MC/T)。固化后 RSB TPA 的最大力平均值介于 0.70 到 2.24 N 之间;内聚力为 0.49-0.73 ;粘着力为 0.01-1.14 N-s。结论:尽管所有菜肴都被划分为相同的定性描述等级(BDA E 级/IDSI 6 级),但以国际单位制(SI)测量,它们的纹理特性(最大力、内聚力和粘合力)却存在很大的显著差异。此外,在健康成年人中,咀嚼周期和达到 RSB 的时间差别很大,而咀嚼频率则保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信