Comparative analysis of pulmonary function in school-going adolescents: Examining the impact of depression and anxiety

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Bhawana Thapa, S. S. Bhandari, Sanjay Kumar, N. B. Laskar, Saumen Gupta
{"title":"Comparative analysis of pulmonary function in school-going adolescents: Examining the impact of depression and anxiety","authors":"Bhawana Thapa, S. S. Bhandari, Sanjay Kumar, N. B. Laskar, Saumen Gupta","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_572_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nGiven the rising concern over depression and anxiety among adolescents, this study aims to investigate their potential impact on respiratory health by comparing pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters between healthy adolescents and those with either depression or anxiety or those exhibiting symptoms of both depression and anxiety.\n\n\n\nIn this cross-sectional study, a random sample of school-going adolescents aged 13–18 years from various schools in Sikkim, both males and females, were selected. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale-25, and pulmonary function was measured using a computerised spirometer-Spirolab III. The recorded variables included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (FEF 25–75%).\n\n\n\nSignificant differences emerged in FVC (P = 0.034), PEFR (P = 0.013) and FEF 25–75% (P = 0.023) between healthy and depressed adolescents aged 13–18 years. Similarly, a significant difference was observed in PEFR (P = 0.022) and FEF 25–75% (P = 0.002) between healthy adolescents and those with symptoms of both depression and anxiety. These differences were more pronounced among students in higher grades. Furthermore, significant differences in PEFR (P = 0.015) and FEF 25–75% (P ≤ 0.001) were found while comparing healthy males and males with symptoms of both depression and anxiety. However, no such disparities were seen in girls. There was no significant difference in any of the parameters when compared between the healthy group and those with anxiety.\n\n\n\nDepressed adolescents exhibited significantly reduced FVC, PEFR and FEF 25–75% compared to their healthy counterparts, despite being otherwise healthy. This negative association was more pronounced in the higher age group. However, anxious adolescents did not show any significant difference in PFT compared to healthy peers.\n","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_572_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the rising concern over depression and anxiety among adolescents, this study aims to investigate their potential impact on respiratory health by comparing pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters between healthy adolescents and those with either depression or anxiety or those exhibiting symptoms of both depression and anxiety. In this cross-sectional study, a random sample of school-going adolescents aged 13–18 years from various schools in Sikkim, both males and females, were selected. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale-25, and pulmonary function was measured using a computerised spirometer-Spirolab III. The recorded variables included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (FEF 25–75%). Significant differences emerged in FVC (P = 0.034), PEFR (P = 0.013) and FEF 25–75% (P = 0.023) between healthy and depressed adolescents aged 13–18 years. Similarly, a significant difference was observed in PEFR (P = 0.022) and FEF 25–75% (P = 0.002) between healthy adolescents and those with symptoms of both depression and anxiety. These differences were more pronounced among students in higher grades. Furthermore, significant differences in PEFR (P = 0.015) and FEF 25–75% (P ≤ 0.001) were found while comparing healthy males and males with symptoms of both depression and anxiety. However, no such disparities were seen in girls. There was no significant difference in any of the parameters when compared between the healthy group and those with anxiety. Depressed adolescents exhibited significantly reduced FVC, PEFR and FEF 25–75% compared to their healthy counterparts, despite being otherwise healthy. This negative association was more pronounced in the higher age group. However, anxious adolescents did not show any significant difference in PFT compared to healthy peers.
在校青少年肺功能对比分析:研究抑郁和焦虑的影响
鉴于青少年抑郁和焦虑问题日益受到关注,本研究旨在通过比较健康青少年与抑郁或焦虑或同时表现出抑郁和焦虑症状的青少年之间的肺功能测试(PFT)参数,来探讨抑郁和焦虑对呼吸系统健康的潜在影响。研究使用修订版儿童焦虑和抑郁量表-25 对抑郁和焦虑进行了评估,并使用计算机化肺活量计-Spirolab III 对肺功能进行了测量。记录的变量包括用力肺活量(FVC)、1 秒钟用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1/FVC 比值、呼气峰流速(PEFR)和 25-75% 用力呼气流量(FEF 25-75%)。13-18 岁健康青少年和抑郁青少年在 FVC(P = 0.034)、PEFR(P = 0.013)和 FEF 25-75% (P = 0.023)方面存在显著差异。同样,健康青少年与同时有抑郁和焦虑症状的青少年在 PEFR (P = 0.022) 和 FEF 25-75% (P = 0.002) 方面也存在明显差异。这些差异在高年级学生中更为明显。此外,健康男性与同时有抑郁和焦虑症状的男性相比,PEFR(P = 0.015)和 FEF 25-75%(P ≤ 0.001)也存在明显差异。然而,在女孩中没有发现这种差异。与健康青少年相比,抑郁青少年的 FVC、PEFR 和 FEF 25-75% 都明显降低,尽管他们在其他方面都很健康。这种负相关在高年龄组中更为明显。然而,与健康青少年相比,焦虑青少年的肺活量并无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信