Feasibility of endoscopic techniques in assessing the radicality of chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

A. A. Salimova, M. V. Makarova, M. Kurdanova, Yu. P. Kuvshinov, I. A. Karasev, T. S. Davydkina
{"title":"Feasibility of endoscopic techniques in assessing the radicality of chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer","authors":"A. A. Salimova, M. V. Makarova, M. Kurdanova, Yu. P. Kuvshinov, I. A. Karasev, T. S. Davydkina","doi":"10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-48-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The standard of treatment of rectal cancer is a combined or complex technique in the form of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or observation, with proven radicalization of CRT. Currently, the most adequate methods of evaluating the results of CRT are endoscopic diagnostics. The most reliable visual criteria for endoscopic examination of absence or presence of residual tumor are: complete response (flat white scar, telangiectasia), partially complete response (uneven mucosa, small nodules on mucosa, superficial ulceration, slight persistent erythema of scar) and incomplete response (visible tumor).Aim. The study is to assess sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic method in assessment of radicality of neoadjuvant CRT in patients with rectal cancer.Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 75 patients with verified rectal cancer after CRT was carried out. Inclusion criteria: histologically verified rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma); endoscopic picture of clinical response of rectal cancer to CRT; absence of established distant metastases at the moment of examination. Exclusion criteria: morphological types of tumors other than adenocarcinoma of the colorectal type; patients with primary-multiple diseases.Results. A retrospective study was conducted in 75 patients with a verified diagnosis of rectal cancer who underwent CRT at the first stage of treatment. All patients underwent endoscopic examination with evaluation of the degree of tumor regression, taking material for cytological and histological examination. In 57 (76,4 %) out of 75 patients on the basis of visual endoscopic picture the absence of residual tumor was stated, in 18 patients visual endoscopic signs were considered as presence of residual tumor. The results of morphological study in the first group of patients confirmed the absence of tumor in 51 cases (92.7 %). In the second group, in the presence of visual signs of residual tumor, morphological confirmation was obtained in 14 out of 18 patients (77.8 %). Morphological verification of residual tumor was obtained in 26.6 % of patients in the total group.Conclusion. Endoscopic and histologic data can be decisive in the evaluation of the degree of radicality of neoadjuvant CRT.","PeriodicalId":509681,"journal":{"name":"Surgery and Oncology","volume":" 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-2-48-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The standard of treatment of rectal cancer is a combined or complex technique in the form of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or observation, with proven radicalization of CRT. Currently, the most adequate methods of evaluating the results of CRT are endoscopic diagnostics. The most reliable visual criteria for endoscopic examination of absence or presence of residual tumor are: complete response (flat white scar, telangiectasia), partially complete response (uneven mucosa, small nodules on mucosa, superficial ulceration, slight persistent erythema of scar) and incomplete response (visible tumor).Aim. The study is to assess sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic method in assessment of radicality of neoadjuvant CRT in patients with rectal cancer.Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 75 patients with verified rectal cancer after CRT was carried out. Inclusion criteria: histologically verified rectal cancer (adenocarcinoma); endoscopic picture of clinical response of rectal cancer to CRT; absence of established distant metastases at the moment of examination. Exclusion criteria: morphological types of tumors other than adenocarcinoma of the colorectal type; patients with primary-multiple diseases.Results. A retrospective study was conducted in 75 patients with a verified diagnosis of rectal cancer who underwent CRT at the first stage of treatment. All patients underwent endoscopic examination with evaluation of the degree of tumor regression, taking material for cytological and histological examination. In 57 (76,4 %) out of 75 patients on the basis of visual endoscopic picture the absence of residual tumor was stated, in 18 patients visual endoscopic signs were considered as presence of residual tumor. The results of morphological study in the first group of patients confirmed the absence of tumor in 51 cases (92.7 %). In the second group, in the presence of visual signs of residual tumor, morphological confirmation was obtained in 14 out of 18 patients (77.8 %). Morphological verification of residual tumor was obtained in 26.6 % of patients in the total group.Conclusion. Endoscopic and histologic data can be decisive in the evaluation of the degree of radicality of neoadjuvant CRT.
用内窥镜技术评估直肠癌患者化放疗根治性的可行性
导言。直肠癌的标准治疗方法是先进行新辅助化放疗(CRT),然后再进行手术或观察,并对 CRT 进行根治。目前,评估 CRT 效果的最适当方法是内窥镜诊断。内镜检查无残留肿瘤或有残留肿瘤的最可靠的视觉标准是:完全反应(平整的白色疤痕、毛细血管扩张)、部分完全反应(粘膜不平整、粘膜上有小结节、浅表溃疡、疤痕处有轻微持续性红斑)和不完全反应(可见肿瘤)。该研究旨在评估内窥镜方法在评估直肠癌患者新辅助 CRT 根治性方面的敏感性和特异性。该研究对 75 名接受 CRT 后确诊的直肠癌患者进行了回顾性研究。纳入标准:经组织学证实的直肠癌(腺癌);内窥镜显示直肠癌对 CRT 的临床反应;检查时未发现远处转移。排除标准:除结直肠腺癌外的其他形态类型肿瘤;原发性多种疾病患者。对 75 名经确诊为直肠癌并在治疗第一阶段接受 CRT 的患者进行了回顾性研究。所有患者都接受了内窥镜检查,评估肿瘤消退程度,并取材进行细胞学和组织学检查。在 75 名患者中,有 57 人(76.4%)根据肉眼观察到的内窥镜图像确定没有残留肿瘤,有 18 人根据肉眼观察到的内窥镜迹象确定有残留肿瘤。第一组患者的形态学研究结果证实 51 例(92.7%)患者没有肿瘤。在第二组患者中,18 例患者中有 14 例(77.8%)在肉眼观察到肿瘤残留的情况下获得了形态学证实。总组中有 26.6% 的患者获得了残留肿瘤的形态学证实。内窥镜和组织学数据对评估新辅助 CRT 的根治程度具有决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信