Effect of Formal Education on Initial Severity of Aphasia - A Retrospective Analysis

Rahul Kumminimana, Anuradha S, Hamza Mullath
{"title":"Effect of Formal Education on Initial Severity of Aphasia - A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Rahul Kumminimana, Anuradha S, Hamza Mullath","doi":"10.52403/ijhsr.20240613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literature supports the education levels of an individual is important for language performance. Cognitive reserve within individuals can be explained on the basis of years of education, occupational achievements, reading habits and lifestyle of an individual. This retrospective study is a preliminary attempt to determine relationship between premorbid educational level and initial aphasia severity. For this purpose, thirty-two Malayalam speaking individuals with aphasia with a maximum post stroke period of three months having three levels of educational qualifications, below and above tenth grade and under graduates were selected. Detailed speech and language assessment were carried out using formal assessment tool. The severity of language impairment was determined by calculating Aphasia quotient. One way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance. Although, subjects had similarities in pattern of Cerebrovascular accidents severity of aphasia varies. The subjects with lower Aphasia Quotient are present in all groups, illustrating that there is less corelation between the subjects' educational attainment and the severity of their communication problems.\n\nKey words: Aphasia, Formal education, Aphasia Quotient","PeriodicalId":14119,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20240613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literature supports the education levels of an individual is important for language performance. Cognitive reserve within individuals can be explained on the basis of years of education, occupational achievements, reading habits and lifestyle of an individual. This retrospective study is a preliminary attempt to determine relationship between premorbid educational level and initial aphasia severity. For this purpose, thirty-two Malayalam speaking individuals with aphasia with a maximum post stroke period of three months having three levels of educational qualifications, below and above tenth grade and under graduates were selected. Detailed speech and language assessment were carried out using formal assessment tool. The severity of language impairment was determined by calculating Aphasia quotient. One way ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance. Although, subjects had similarities in pattern of Cerebrovascular accidents severity of aphasia varies. The subjects with lower Aphasia Quotient are present in all groups, illustrating that there is less corelation between the subjects' educational attainment and the severity of their communication problems. Key words: Aphasia, Formal education, Aphasia Quotient
正规教育对失语症初期严重程度的影响 - 一项回顾性分析
有文献证明,个人的教育水平对语言成绩很重要。个人的认知储备可以根据个人的教育年限、职业成就、阅读习惯和生活方式来解释。这项回顾性研究是一项初步尝试,旨在确定病前教育水平与初期失语症严重程度之间的关系。为此,研究人员选取了 32 名讲马拉雅拉姆语的失语症患者,他们中风后的最长时间为三个月,学历分为三个等级:十年级以下、十年级以上和本科毕业生。他们使用正式的评估工具进行了详细的言语和语言评估。通过计算失语商数来确定语言障碍的严重程度。采用单向方差分析确定统计意义。虽然受试者的脑血管意外模式相似,但失语症的严重程度各不相同。所有组别中都有失语商较低的受试者,这说明受试者的教育程度与沟通问题的严重程度之间的相关性较小:失语症、正规教育、失语商数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信