Effect on Lung Function by Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Post-Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients

Dr. Joicy Senlin
{"title":"Effect on Lung Function by Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Post-Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients","authors":"Dr. Joicy Senlin","doi":"10.52403/ijhsr.20240616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to find out effect on lung function by pulmonary rehabilitation on post hospitalized covid -19 patients.\nMethod: This study was designed as experimental, randomized double-blinded study. Participate divided into two groups- the pulmonary rehabilitation group (Group A) and control group (Group B). The inclusion criteria were patient with confirmed case of infection of COVID-19 was defined by RT-PCR assay on nasopharyngeal swab; aged 20 to 55 years; Hospitalized due to severity of covid-19 symptoms, persistent high grade fever>1000 F, breathlessness, increase in dry cough), ≥3 months after any hospital discharge related to COVID-19 infection, regardless of need for critical care or ventilator support., Any persistent sequel of COVID- 19. All participants were explained the study protocol and they were enrolled in protocol after their written consent for this study. Lung function was taken before and after the study protocol. Within group analysis using Wilcoxon signed Rank test. Between group analysis using Mann-Whitney Test. Level of significance was kept at p<0.005.\nResults: In Group A, mean and SD for FEV1for Pre test was 116.58 ± 25.03 and for post test was104.32±14.60. The P value was<0.001which shows that the intervention was effective. The Mean and SD for FVC for PreTest102.96±22.39and for post test was96.88±19.07. The P value was <0.001 which shows that the intervention was effective. Mean and SD for FEV1/FVC for Pre Test 113.84 ± 11.25 and for post test was 109.40 ± 15.04. The P value was 0.024 which shows that the intervention was effective.\nConclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation is possible and effective therapeutic strategy to improve the lung function and improve quality of life post-hospitalized COVID-19 patients.\n\nKey words: COVID-19, Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Lung function test","PeriodicalId":14119,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":" 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20240616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to find out effect on lung function by pulmonary rehabilitation on post hospitalized covid -19 patients. Method: This study was designed as experimental, randomized double-blinded study. Participate divided into two groups- the pulmonary rehabilitation group (Group A) and control group (Group B). The inclusion criteria were patient with confirmed case of infection of COVID-19 was defined by RT-PCR assay on nasopharyngeal swab; aged 20 to 55 years; Hospitalized due to severity of covid-19 symptoms, persistent high grade fever>1000 F, breathlessness, increase in dry cough), ≥3 months after any hospital discharge related to COVID-19 infection, regardless of need for critical care or ventilator support., Any persistent sequel of COVID- 19. All participants were explained the study protocol and they were enrolled in protocol after their written consent for this study. Lung function was taken before and after the study protocol. Within group analysis using Wilcoxon signed Rank test. Between group analysis using Mann-Whitney Test. Level of significance was kept at p<0.005. Results: In Group A, mean and SD for FEV1for Pre test was 116.58 ± 25.03 and for post test was104.32±14.60. The P value was<0.001which shows that the intervention was effective. The Mean and SD for FVC for PreTest102.96±22.39and for post test was96.88±19.07. The P value was <0.001 which shows that the intervention was effective. Mean and SD for FEV1/FVC for Pre Test 113.84 ± 11.25 and for post test was 109.40 ± 15.04. The P value was 0.024 which shows that the intervention was effective. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation is possible and effective therapeutic strategy to improve the lung function and improve quality of life post-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Key words: COVID-19, Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Lung function test
肺康复对 COVID-19 住院后患者肺功能的影响
目的:了解肺康复治疗对19例住院后合并症患者肺功能的影响:本研究为实验性、随机双盲研究。参与者分为两组--肺康复治疗组(A 组)和对照组(B 组)。纳入标准为:通过鼻咽拭子 RT-PCR 检测确诊感染 COVID-19;年龄在 20 至 55 岁之间;因 COVID-19 症状严重(持续高烧超过 1000 华氏度、呼吸困难、干咳加剧)而住院;与 COVID-19 感染相关的出院后≥3 个月,无论是否需要重症监护或呼吸机支持。向所有参与者解释了研究方案,并在获得书面同意后将其纳入方案。研究方案实施前后均进行了肺功能检测。组内分析采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验。组间分析采用 Mann-Whitney 检验。显著性水平为 p<0.005:在 A 组中,试验前 FEV1 的平均值为 116.58 ± 25.03,试验后为 104.32 ± 14.60。P 值<0.001,表明干预有效。测试前 FVC 的平均值和标定值为 102.96±22.39,测试后为 96.88±19.07。P值小于0.001,表明干预有效。测试前 FEV1/FVC 的平均值和标码为 113.84 ± 11.25,测试后为 109.40 ± 15.04。P 值为 0.024,表明干预是有效的:肺康复是改善 COVID-19 患者住院后肺功能和生活质量的可行且有效的治疗策略:COVID-19、肺康复、肺功能测试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信