What are the Prospects of Propane-Powered Off-Grid Electricity?

Obindah Gershon, Cephalus Wariri
{"title":"What are the Prospects of Propane-Powered Off-Grid Electricity?","authors":"Obindah Gershon, Cephalus Wariri","doi":"10.20525/ijfbs.v13i2.3382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study contributes to the literature on propane's prospects and viability for off-grid energy, implications for stakeholders, and alignment with sustainable energy goal 7. It examines the prospects of propane-powered off-grid electricity in the Nigerian electricity supply industry (NESI). The study assessed propane’s economic viability and environmental implications as a replacement for diesel (AGO). Specifically, the analyses included comparative levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), net present value (NPV) modeling, Monte Carlo simulations, and carbon emissions estimation. The study found that the cost of energy from diesel (AGO) is 1.52 to 2.86 times of grid MYTO tariffs and 1.84 to 3.92 times of the MYTO tariffs for All-in LCOE. The average total LCOEs were 1.01 to 1.63 times for the commercial bank and 1.02 to 1.63 times for the residential estate. The LCOEs for the AGO generators ranged from $0.183 to $0.286 (fuel only) and $0.335 to $0.392 per kWh all-in. These comparative LCOEs are between 110% and 263.8% of the electricity tariff averages in the US (residential: $0.155/kWh and commercial: $0.127/kWh) and the UK (£0.245/kWh) and, accordingly, confirm the expensive nature of AGO-based electricity in Nigeria. Furthermore, the study found that propane-based off-grid energy is a viable substitute for AGO and cheaper than the current Band A tariff of N206.80KWh, with savings between 10.52% and 45.25%. The study also shows that propane is a cleaner and more efficient source of energy that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 13.8% and as high as 31.1% depending on the generator-load match efficiency with the associated monetized savings between $9.18 and $20.62 per MT CO2e. The study recommends government incentives and private sector investments towards adopting propane for off-grid electricity, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions, achieving Nigeria’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) plan, and promoting sustainable development.  ","PeriodicalId":181605,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v13i2.3382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study contributes to the literature on propane's prospects and viability for off-grid energy, implications for stakeholders, and alignment with sustainable energy goal 7. It examines the prospects of propane-powered off-grid electricity in the Nigerian electricity supply industry (NESI). The study assessed propane’s economic viability and environmental implications as a replacement for diesel (AGO). Specifically, the analyses included comparative levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), net present value (NPV) modeling, Monte Carlo simulations, and carbon emissions estimation. The study found that the cost of energy from diesel (AGO) is 1.52 to 2.86 times of grid MYTO tariffs and 1.84 to 3.92 times of the MYTO tariffs for All-in LCOE. The average total LCOEs were 1.01 to 1.63 times for the commercial bank and 1.02 to 1.63 times for the residential estate. The LCOEs for the AGO generators ranged from $0.183 to $0.286 (fuel only) and $0.335 to $0.392 per kWh all-in. These comparative LCOEs are between 110% and 263.8% of the electricity tariff averages in the US (residential: $0.155/kWh and commercial: $0.127/kWh) and the UK (£0.245/kWh) and, accordingly, confirm the expensive nature of AGO-based electricity in Nigeria. Furthermore, the study found that propane-based off-grid energy is a viable substitute for AGO and cheaper than the current Band A tariff of N206.80KWh, with savings between 10.52% and 45.25%. The study also shows that propane is a cleaner and more efficient source of energy that can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 13.8% and as high as 31.1% depending on the generator-load match efficiency with the associated monetized savings between $9.18 and $20.62 per MT CO2e. The study recommends government incentives and private sector investments towards adopting propane for off-grid electricity, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions, achieving Nigeria’s nationally determined contribution (NDC) plan, and promoting sustainable development.  
丙烷离网供电的前景如何?
本研究为有关丙烷在离网能源方面的前景和可行性、对利益相关者的影响以及与可持续能源目标 7 的一致性的文献做出了贡献。研究探讨了尼日利亚电力供应行业(NESI)中丙烷离网供电的前景。研究评估了丙烷作为柴油(AGO)替代品的经济可行性和对环境的影响。具体来说,分析包括比较平准化电力成本 (LCOE)、净现值 (NPV) 建模、蒙特卡罗模拟和碳排放估算。研究发现,柴油发电(AGO)的能源成本是电网 MYTO 电价的 1.52 至 2.86 倍,全包 LCOE 是 MYTO 电价的 1.84 至 3.92 倍。商业银行的平均总 LCOE 为 1.01 至 1.63 倍,住宅小区为 1.02 至 1.63 倍。AGO 发电机的 LCOE 为每千瓦时 0.183 至 0.286 美元(仅燃料)和 0.335 至 0.392 美元(全包)。这些比较 LCOE 是美国(住宅:0.155 美元/千瓦时,商业:0.127 美元/千瓦时)和英国(0.245 英镑/千瓦时)平均电价的 110% 至 263.8%,因此证实了尼日利亚基于 AGO 的电力的昂贵性质。此外,研究还发现,丙烷离网能源是 AGO 的可行替代品,比目前的 A 级电价 206.80 NWh 便宜,可节省 10.52% 至 45.25%。研究还表明,丙烷是一种更清洁、更高效的能源,可帮助减少至少 13.8%、高达 31.1%的温室气体排放,具体取决于发电机与负载的匹配效率,每公吨二氧化碳当量可节省 9.18 美元至 20.62 美元。该研究建议政府采取激励措施,私营部门进行投资,采用丙烷进行离网供电,从而减少温室气体排放,实现尼日利亚国家确定的贡献(NDC)计划,促进可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信