The flaring activity of blazar AO 0235+164 in 2021

J. Escudero Pedrosa, I. Agudo, Till Moritz, P. Alan Marscher, S. Jorstad, A. Tramacere, C. Casadio, C. Thum, I. Myserlis, A. Sievers, J. Otero-Santos, D. Morcuende, R. López-Coto, F. D’Ammando, G. Bonnoli, M. Gurwell, José Luis Gómez, R. Rao, G. Keating
{"title":"The flaring activity of blazar AO 0235+164 in 2021","authors":"J. Escudero Pedrosa, I. Agudo, Till Moritz, P. Alan Marscher, S. Jorstad, A. Tramacere, C. Casadio, C. Thum, I. Myserlis, A. Sievers, J. Otero-Santos, D. Morcuende, R. López-Coto, F. D’Ammando, G. Bonnoli, M. Gurwell, José Luis Gómez, R. Rao, G. Keating","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202449726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The blazar AO 0235+164 located at redshift $z=0.94$, has displayed interesting and repeating flaring activity in the past, with recent episodes in 2008 and 2015. In 2020, the source brightened again, starting a new flaring episode that peaked in 2021. We study the origin and properties of the 2021 flare in relation to previous studies and the historical behavior of the source, in particular the 2008 and 2015 flaring episodes. We analyzed the multiwavelength photo-polarimetric evolution of the source. From Very Long Baseline Array images, we derived the kinematic parameters of new components associated with the 2021 flare. We used this information to constrain a model for the spectral energy distribution of the emission during the flaring period. We propose an analytical geometric model to test whether the observed wobbling of the jet is consistent with precession. We report the appearance of two new components that are ejected in a different direction than previously, confirming the wobbling of the jet. We find that the direction of ejection is consistent with that of a precessing jet.\n Our derived period independently agrees with the values commonly found in the literature.\n \n Modeling of the spectral energy distribution further confirms that the differences between flares can be attributed to geometrical effects.","PeriodicalId":505693,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":" 82","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The blazar AO 0235+164 located at redshift $z=0.94$, has displayed interesting and repeating flaring activity in the past, with recent episodes in 2008 and 2015. In 2020, the source brightened again, starting a new flaring episode that peaked in 2021. We study the origin and properties of the 2021 flare in relation to previous studies and the historical behavior of the source, in particular the 2008 and 2015 flaring episodes. We analyzed the multiwavelength photo-polarimetric evolution of the source. From Very Long Baseline Array images, we derived the kinematic parameters of new components associated with the 2021 flare. We used this information to constrain a model for the spectral energy distribution of the emission during the flaring period. We propose an analytical geometric model to test whether the observed wobbling of the jet is consistent with precession. We report the appearance of two new components that are ejected in a different direction than previously, confirming the wobbling of the jet. We find that the direction of ejection is consistent with that of a precessing jet. Our derived period independently agrees with the values commonly found in the literature. Modeling of the spectral energy distribution further confirms that the differences between flares can be attributed to geometrical effects.
2021 年炽星 AO 0235+164 的耀斑活动
位于红移$z=0.94$的耀斑星AO 0235+164在过去显示出有趣的、重复的耀斑活动,最近的耀斑活动发生在2008年和2015年。2020 年,该光源再次变亮,开始了新一轮的耀斑活动,并在 2021 年达到顶峰。我们研究了 2021 年耀斑的起源和特性,并将其与以前的研究和该源的历史行为,尤其是 2008 年和 2015 年的耀斑事件联系起来。我们分析了源的多波长光偏振演变。通过甚长基线阵列图像,我们得出了与2021年耀斑相关的新成分的运动参数。我们利用这些信息来约束耀斑期间发射的光谱能量分布模型。我们提出了一个几何分析模型来检验观测到的喷流摆动是否与前摄一致。我们报告了两个新成分的出现,它们的喷射方向与以前不同,证实了喷流的摆动。我们发现喷流的喷射方向与前冲喷流的喷射方向一致。我们独立得出的周期与文献中常见的值一致。 光谱能量分布模型进一步证实,耀斑之间的差异可以归因于几何效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信