Physicochemical, Cooking Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Three Cowpea Varieties Grown in Botswana

Oduetse Daniel Gopadile, R. Kobue-Lekalake, Boitumelo Mokobi, G. Bultosa
{"title":"Physicochemical, Cooking Quality and Sensory Acceptability of Three Cowpea Varieties Grown in Botswana","authors":"Oduetse Daniel Gopadile, R. Kobue-Lekalake, Boitumelo Mokobi, G. Bultosa","doi":"10.18805/ajdfr.drf-356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Information on the physicochemical, cooking and sensory qualities of cowpea seeds are required for nutrition information, to design processing and for consumer acceptance. In view of this, three cowpea varieties (Tswana, Blackeye and ER7) grown in Botswana were evaluated. Method: Proximate compositions, physical, gelatinization and sensory properties respectively were evaluated following AOAC, conventional, Amylograph and on 7-point hedonic sensory acceptability scale. Result: Significant variations (p less than 0.05) were observed in fat, fiber, ash and available carbohydrate (CHO) contents, length, thickness, hundred seeds weight (HSW), hydration capacity, hydration index, cooking time, flour starches maximum gelatinization temperature (Tm,°C) and viscosity at Tm. The percentage moisture, protein, fiber, fat, ash and available carbohydrate contents ranged 9.5-10.1, 21.7-22.8, 2.3-2.6, 1.1-2.0, 2.1-3.0 and 59.4-62.3, respectively. Initial gelatinization temperature (To,°C) and Tm (°C) were ranged 71.3(ER7)-73.7(Tswana) and 83.0(ER7)-84.7(Blackeye), respectively. Significant (p less than 0.05) variations in Tm and viscosity at Tm were observed because of differences in water uptake, swelling and thickening ability at high temperature. Longest cooking time was recorded for Tswana (43.57 min) while shortest was for Blackeye (36.10 min). Tswana recorded a longer cooking time probably because of low water hydration capacity, small seed size and low HSW. There was no significant difference in the sensory liking of the cooked cowpea seeds and were rated from slightly to moderately like. Cowpeas of high protein and fiber contents, short cooking time and high thickening ability on cooking are preferred for healthy diets. In terms of cooking time and thickening ability, Tswana variety appeared poor. Shorter cooking time, high protein content and high thickening ability of Blackeye cowpea is more acceptable. The ER7 is preferred for its large seed size.\n","PeriodicalId":8485,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.drf-356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Information on the physicochemical, cooking and sensory qualities of cowpea seeds are required for nutrition information, to design processing and for consumer acceptance. In view of this, three cowpea varieties (Tswana, Blackeye and ER7) grown in Botswana were evaluated. Method: Proximate compositions, physical, gelatinization and sensory properties respectively were evaluated following AOAC, conventional, Amylograph and on 7-point hedonic sensory acceptability scale. Result: Significant variations (p less than 0.05) were observed in fat, fiber, ash and available carbohydrate (CHO) contents, length, thickness, hundred seeds weight (HSW), hydration capacity, hydration index, cooking time, flour starches maximum gelatinization temperature (Tm,°C) and viscosity at Tm. The percentage moisture, protein, fiber, fat, ash and available carbohydrate contents ranged 9.5-10.1, 21.7-22.8, 2.3-2.6, 1.1-2.0, 2.1-3.0 and 59.4-62.3, respectively. Initial gelatinization temperature (To,°C) and Tm (°C) were ranged 71.3(ER7)-73.7(Tswana) and 83.0(ER7)-84.7(Blackeye), respectively. Significant (p less than 0.05) variations in Tm and viscosity at Tm were observed because of differences in water uptake, swelling and thickening ability at high temperature. Longest cooking time was recorded for Tswana (43.57 min) while shortest was for Blackeye (36.10 min). Tswana recorded a longer cooking time probably because of low water hydration capacity, small seed size and low HSW. There was no significant difference in the sensory liking of the cooked cowpea seeds and were rated from slightly to moderately like. Cowpeas of high protein and fiber contents, short cooking time and high thickening ability on cooking are preferred for healthy diets. In terms of cooking time and thickening ability, Tswana variety appeared poor. Shorter cooking time, high protein content and high thickening ability of Blackeye cowpea is more acceptable. The ER7 is preferred for its large seed size.
博茨瓦纳种植的三个豇豆品种的理化、烹饪质量和感官可接受性
背景:需要有关豇豆种子的理化、烹饪和感官品质的信息,以获得营养信息、设计加工工艺和消费者接受度。有鉴于此,我们对博茨瓦纳种植的三个豇豆品种(Tswana、Blackkeye 和 ER7)进行了评估。方法:按照 AOAC 标准、传统方法、淀粉仪和 7 点享乐主义感官可接受性量表分别对近似成分、物理、糊化和感官特性进行了评估。结果脂肪、纤维、灰分和可用碳水化合物(CHO)含量、长度、厚度、百粒重(HSW)、水合能力、水合指数、蒸煮时间、面粉淀粉的最高糊化温度(Tm,°C)和 Tm 时的粘度均有显著差异(p 小于 0.05)。水分、蛋白质、纤维、脂肪、灰分和可得碳水化合物含量分别为 9.5-10.1、21.7-22.8、2.3-2.6、1.1-2.0、2.1-3.0 和 59.4-62.3。初始糊化温度(To,°C)和 Tm(°C)分别为 71.3(ER7)-73.7(Tswana)和 83.0(ER7)-84.7(Blackeye)。由于高温下的吸水、膨胀和增稠能力不同,Tm 和 Tm 时的粘度出现了显著变化(p 小于 0.05)。Tswana的蒸煮时间最长(43.57 分钟),Blackkeye的蒸煮时间最短(36.10 分钟)。Tswana的蒸煮时间较长,可能是因为水合能力低、种子小和HSW低。煮熟的豇豆种子在感官喜好上没有明显差异,从略微喜欢到中等喜欢不等。蛋白质和纤维含量高、烹饪时间短、烹饪增稠能力强的豇豆是健康饮食的首选。在烹饪时间和增稠能力方面,茨瓦纳品种显得较差。而烹饪时间短、蛋白质含量高、增稠能力强的黑眼豇豆更容易被接受。ER7 因种子大而更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信