Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice?

David Andri Burkhalter, Antonio Cartellá, Domenico Cozzo, Adam Ogna, Valentina Forni Ogna
{"title":"Obstructive sleep apnea in the hemodialysis population: are clinicians putting existing scientific evidence into practice?","authors":"David Andri Burkhalter, Antonio Cartellá, Domenico Cozzo, Adam Ogna, Valentina Forni Ogna","doi":"10.3389/fneph.2024.1394990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemodialysis (HD) populations have a high prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), which was specifically linked with fluid overload. HD fluid management targeting a low dry weight was shown to reduce OSA severity, opening to novel therapeutic options. We assessed nephrologists’ awareness of OSA diagnosis in HD patients and whether they integrate the current knowledge into their fluid management strategy.We performed a multicenter, cross-sectional study between July 2022 and July 2023, screening all HD patients of four HD units, and included those with confirmed OSA. We collected anthropometric parameters and fluid status from electronic dossiers. Predialysis fluid overload was measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance (BCM®). Nephrologists were asked to identify patients with known OSA, without consulting medical dossiers. The fluid management of patients identified as “OSA positive” was compared to that of patients misclassified as “OSA negative”.Among 193 HD patients, 23.0% (n=45) had confirmed OSA. The mean age was 76.0 ± 7.5 years, 82.2% were men. Only 60% were correctly identified as “OSA positive” by nephrologists; 14.7% of patients on CPAP were identified. BMI was the only factor associated with correct OSA identification. The predialysis fluid overload tended to be greater in “OSA positive” patients than in the “OSA negative” patients (2.2 ± 1.4 kg vs 1.5 ± 1.3 kg; p=0.08), but there was no difference in postdialysis achievement of dry weight between the groups (residual overweight 0.2 ± 1.0 kg and 0.1 ± 0.7 kg; p= 0.672).Our study suggests that the application of scientific evidence to the management of OSA in dialysis patients is not systematic. However, nephrologists have attempted to strictly achieve dry weight in all patients, regardless of OSA status. Sensibilization of nephrologists on the clinical and diagnostic peculiarities of OSA in HD patients may improve OSA diagnosis and therapeutic care.","PeriodicalId":502454,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nephrology","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneph.2024.1394990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) populations have a high prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), which was specifically linked with fluid overload. HD fluid management targeting a low dry weight was shown to reduce OSA severity, opening to novel therapeutic options. We assessed nephrologists’ awareness of OSA diagnosis in HD patients and whether they integrate the current knowledge into their fluid management strategy.We performed a multicenter, cross-sectional study between July 2022 and July 2023, screening all HD patients of four HD units, and included those with confirmed OSA. We collected anthropometric parameters and fluid status from electronic dossiers. Predialysis fluid overload was measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance (BCM®). Nephrologists were asked to identify patients with known OSA, without consulting medical dossiers. The fluid management of patients identified as “OSA positive” was compared to that of patients misclassified as “OSA negative”.Among 193 HD patients, 23.0% (n=45) had confirmed OSA. The mean age was 76.0 ± 7.5 years, 82.2% were men. Only 60% were correctly identified as “OSA positive” by nephrologists; 14.7% of patients on CPAP were identified. BMI was the only factor associated with correct OSA identification. The predialysis fluid overload tended to be greater in “OSA positive” patients than in the “OSA negative” patients (2.2 ± 1.4 kg vs 1.5 ± 1.3 kg; p=0.08), but there was no difference in postdialysis achievement of dry weight between the groups (residual overweight 0.2 ± 1.0 kg and 0.1 ± 0.7 kg; p= 0.672).Our study suggests that the application of scientific evidence to the management of OSA in dialysis patients is not systematic. However, nephrologists have attempted to strictly achieve dry weight in all patients, regardless of OSA status. Sensibilization of nephrologists on the clinical and diagnostic peculiarities of OSA in HD patients may improve OSA diagnosis and therapeutic care.
血液透析人群中的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:临床医生是否将现有科学证据付诸实践?
血液透析(HD)人群中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的发病率很高,这与液体超负荷有特别的联系。事实证明,以低干重为目标的血液透析液管理可减轻 OSA 的严重程度,从而提供了新的治疗方案。我们在 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 7 月期间开展了一项多中心横断面研究,对四个 HD 单位的所有 HD 患者进行了筛查,并纳入了确诊为 OSA 的患者。我们从电子档案中收集了人体测量参数和体液状况。透析前体液超负荷通过多频生物电阻抗 (BCM®) 进行测量。要求肾病专家在不查阅医疗档案的情况下识别出已知患有 OSA 的患者。在 193 名血液透析患者中,23.0%(45 人)确诊为 OSA。平均年龄为 76.0 ± 7.5 岁,82.2% 为男性。只有 60% 的患者被肾脏科医生正确识别为 "OSA 阳性";14.7% 使用 CPAP 的患者被识别为 "OSA 阳性"。体重指数是唯一与正确识别 OSA 相关的因素。与 "OSA 阴性 "患者相比,"OSA 阳性 "患者透析前体液超负荷往往更大(2.2 ± 1.4 千克 vs 1.5 ± 1.3 千克;P=0.08),但两组患者透析后干重的达标情况没有差异(剩余超重 0.2 ± 1.0 千克和 0.1 ± 0.7 千克;P= 0.672)。我们的研究表明,将科学证据应用于透析患者的 OSA 管理并不系统。然而,肾病学家一直试图严格控制所有患者的干体重,无论其 OSA 状况如何。让肾科医生了解血液透析患者 OSA 的临床和诊断特点,可以改善 OSA 的诊断和治疗护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信