INCLUSIVE ECONOMY AND PUBLIC FINANCE: CURRENT STATE AND PRINCIPLES OF POST-WAR RECOVERY

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS
Serhii Petrukha, D. Konovalenko, Nina Petrukha
{"title":"INCLUSIVE ECONOMY AND PUBLIC FINANCE: CURRENT STATE AND PRINCIPLES OF POST-WAR RECOVERY","authors":"Serhii Petrukha, D. Konovalenko, Nina Petrukha","doi":"10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-2-219-231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyse the current state of the economy and public finances in Ukraine and to develop an inclusive and collaborative framework for their post-war recovery. The main research methods used were quantitative, qualitative and documentary analysis. Quantitative analysis was used to evaluate and compare key economic and financial indicators between different countries, as well as to identify trends, including inclusive ones, in the development of the economy and public finances. Qualitative analysis was used to study and analyse the political, social and economic factors that influence the development of an inclusive economy and public finance after conflicts. The documentary analysis was used to assess the legal and regulatory framework governing economic and financial relations in Ukraine and other countries, and to determine the capacity of the existing regulatory system to ensure inclusive post-war recovery. The results of the study, based on the study of empirical material and typologies of best practices of countries that have been in various types of conflicts, prove the need for an in-depth study of the interactions and interdependencies between the inclusive economy and public finance based on the Inclusive Growth Index and structural changes in the issues of the impact of inclusion on the ontogeny of public finance, solving problems with corruption, involvement of civil society institutions and adaptation of SMEs to the conditions of the military economy. The paper also identifies structural, fiscal and debt obstacles to ensuring the sustainability of public finances, which threatens Ukraine's further post-war recovery based on an inclusive paradigm. The authors present the key determinants of post-war recovery based on an inclusive country ranking, which should underpin further progress in public finance in the context of short-, medium- and long-term post-war goals. The study's conclusions are based on the inclusive economy paradigm, which forms an ecosystem of rationalisation of natural resources and the use of innovations, which should become the basis for post-war recovery, ensuring sustainable and balanced development of public finances and inclusive economic policy based on the Ukrainian Peace Formula. To this end, the article substantiates the need to develop a modified version of the strategy (in the tactical projection – more broadly adapted to the conditions of the wartime economy, the need to provide financial resources for the shift in economic policy from raw material orientation to inclusive development, in the medium term – anti-crisis correction of behavioural models of economic agents in the direction of imbuing the Ukraine Facility Plan for 2024-2027 with the spirit of inclusion and barrier-free access, and in the long term – achieving the goals of post-war recovery, ensuring the sustainability of public finances and the national economy) for reforming the public finance management system, which should organically include the post-war recovery of Ukraine and take into account the inclusiveness of the economy, taking into account the programmed joint evolutionary progress in the specified niche (sectoral) strategies. The new socio-economic, financial and budgetary reality coloured by the Russian-Ukrainian war makes it necessary to rethink the interactions and interdependencies between inclusion, public finance and the potential for post-war recovery, both as a result of their collaboration and multidirectional development. The unregulated transition of economic policy to inclusive development is the root cause of the current restraint of transformational changes in public finance, and further creates a regulatory \"vacuum\" in the unbalanced development of niche strategies that define the paradigm of inclusion and sustainability of public finance. In such a disposition, there is no logical institutional and regulatory \"flow\" between these strategies to the conceptualisation of Ukraine's post-war recovery from the consequences of the war, as expressed in the Ukraine Facility Plan for 2024-2027.","PeriodicalId":44766,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Economic Studies","volume":" 956","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2024-10-2-219-231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the current state of the economy and public finances in Ukraine and to develop an inclusive and collaborative framework for their post-war recovery. The main research methods used were quantitative, qualitative and documentary analysis. Quantitative analysis was used to evaluate and compare key economic and financial indicators between different countries, as well as to identify trends, including inclusive ones, in the development of the economy and public finances. Qualitative analysis was used to study and analyse the political, social and economic factors that influence the development of an inclusive economy and public finance after conflicts. The documentary analysis was used to assess the legal and regulatory framework governing economic and financial relations in Ukraine and other countries, and to determine the capacity of the existing regulatory system to ensure inclusive post-war recovery. The results of the study, based on the study of empirical material and typologies of best practices of countries that have been in various types of conflicts, prove the need for an in-depth study of the interactions and interdependencies between the inclusive economy and public finance based on the Inclusive Growth Index and structural changes in the issues of the impact of inclusion on the ontogeny of public finance, solving problems with corruption, involvement of civil society institutions and adaptation of SMEs to the conditions of the military economy. The paper also identifies structural, fiscal and debt obstacles to ensuring the sustainability of public finances, which threatens Ukraine's further post-war recovery based on an inclusive paradigm. The authors present the key determinants of post-war recovery based on an inclusive country ranking, which should underpin further progress in public finance in the context of short-, medium- and long-term post-war goals. The study's conclusions are based on the inclusive economy paradigm, which forms an ecosystem of rationalisation of natural resources and the use of innovations, which should become the basis for post-war recovery, ensuring sustainable and balanced development of public finances and inclusive economic policy based on the Ukrainian Peace Formula. To this end, the article substantiates the need to develop a modified version of the strategy (in the tactical projection – more broadly adapted to the conditions of the wartime economy, the need to provide financial resources for the shift in economic policy from raw material orientation to inclusive development, in the medium term – anti-crisis correction of behavioural models of economic agents in the direction of imbuing the Ukraine Facility Plan for 2024-2027 with the spirit of inclusion and barrier-free access, and in the long term – achieving the goals of post-war recovery, ensuring the sustainability of public finances and the national economy) for reforming the public finance management system, which should organically include the post-war recovery of Ukraine and take into account the inclusiveness of the economy, taking into account the programmed joint evolutionary progress in the specified niche (sectoral) strategies. The new socio-economic, financial and budgetary reality coloured by the Russian-Ukrainian war makes it necessary to rethink the interactions and interdependencies between inclusion, public finance and the potential for post-war recovery, both as a result of their collaboration and multidirectional development. The unregulated transition of economic policy to inclusive development is the root cause of the current restraint of transformational changes in public finance, and further creates a regulatory "vacuum" in the unbalanced development of niche strategies that define the paradigm of inclusion and sustainability of public finance. In such a disposition, there is no logical institutional and regulatory "flow" between these strategies to the conceptualisation of Ukraine's post-war recovery from the consequences of the war, as expressed in the Ukraine Facility Plan for 2024-2027.
包容性经济和公共财政:战后复苏的现状和原则
本研究的目的是分析乌克兰的经济和公共财政现状,并为其战后恢复制定一个包容性的合作框架。采用的主要研究方法有定量分析、定性分析和文献分析。定量分析用于评估和比较不同国家的主要经济和财政指标,以及确定经济和公共财政发展的趋势,包括包容性趋势。定性分析用于研究和分析影响冲突后包容性经济和公共财政发展的政治、社会和经济因素。文献分析用于评估乌克兰和其他国家管理经济和金融关系的法律和监管框架,并确定现有监管系统确保战后包容性恢复的能力。研究结果基于对经历过各类冲突的国家的经验材料和最佳做法类型的研究,证明有必要深入研究基于包容性增长指数的包容性经济和公共财政之间的相互作用和相互依存关系,以及包容性对公共财政本体的影响、解决腐败问题、民间社会机构的参与和中小企业适应军事经济条件等问题的结构性变化。本文还指出了在确保公共财政可持续性方面存在的结构、财政和债务障碍,这些障碍威胁着乌克兰在包容性范式基础上的进一步战后恢复。作者在包容性国家排名的基础上提出了战后恢复的关键决定因素,这应成为在战后短期、中期和长期目标背景下公共财政取得进一步进展的基础。研究结论以包容性经济范式为基础,该范式形成了自然资源合理化和利用创新的生态系统,应成为战后恢复的基础,确保公共财政的可持续和平衡发展,以及基于乌克兰和平公式的包容性经济政策。为此,文章论证了制定修改版战略的必要性(在战术预测方面--更广泛地适应战时经济条件,需要为经济政策从原材料导向转向包容性发展提供财政资源;在中期方面--对经济行为主体的行为模式进行反危机修正,使 2024-2027 年乌克兰融资计划充满包容和无障碍精神、从长期来看--实现战后恢复的目标,确保公共财政和国民经济的可持续 性),以改革公共财政管理制度,其中应有机地包括乌克兰的战后恢复,并考 虑到经济的包容性,同时考虑到在特定的利基(部门)战略中计划的共同发展进 程。俄乌战争带来的新的社会经济、财政和预算现实使得有必要重新思考包容性、公共财政和战后恢复潜力之间的相互作用和相互依存关系,这既是它们合作的结果,也是它们多向发展的结果。经济政策向包容性发展的无序过渡是当前公共财政转型变革受限的根本原因,也进一步造成了界定公共财政包容性和可持续性范式的利基战略发展不平衡的监管 "真空"。在这种情况下,这些战略与《2024-2027 年乌克兰融资计划》中所表述的乌克兰战后从战争后果中恢复的概念之间没有合乎逻辑的体制和监管 "流程"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信