“I Feel Like I am Part of Something Bigger Than Me”: Methodological Reflections From Longitudinal Online Participatory Research

M. Power, Ruth Patrick, K. Garthwaite
{"title":"“I Feel Like I am Part of Something Bigger Than Me”: Methodological Reflections From Longitudinal Online Participatory Research","authors":"M. Power, Ruth Patrick, K. Garthwaite","doi":"10.1177/19408447241260448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article details methodological reflections and implications for future work from an innovative, participatory research project that started life during the UK’s first COVID-19 lockdown in early 2020. We reflect on the practice, ethical considerations, and challenges of this (necessarily) online participatory research program, which featured intensive, prolonged collaboration with parents/carers living on a low income within the UK. We discuss the ethical-epistemological foundations of the work, specifically a feminist ethics of care and reciprocity, and present our unique methodological approach, detailing how technology was used to collaborate with a diverse, nation-wide community of parents/carers. We discuss our own and participants’ reflections, including the distinctive complexities and advantages of conducting participatory research online, and also the challenges of upholding an ethics of care in an online, participatory space. We highlight the time intensive nature of this work and argue that, within the academy, more needs to be done both to recognize this and to find ways to create space within it for documenting and learning from innovations in the methodology pursued. We conclude with reflections on the new possibilities that emerge when translating participatory principles to online spaces—learnings with clear relevance for others interested in pursuing these approaches.","PeriodicalId":512691,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Qualitative Research","volume":" 1029","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447241260448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article details methodological reflections and implications for future work from an innovative, participatory research project that started life during the UK’s first COVID-19 lockdown in early 2020. We reflect on the practice, ethical considerations, and challenges of this (necessarily) online participatory research program, which featured intensive, prolonged collaboration with parents/carers living on a low income within the UK. We discuss the ethical-epistemological foundations of the work, specifically a feminist ethics of care and reciprocity, and present our unique methodological approach, detailing how technology was used to collaborate with a diverse, nation-wide community of parents/carers. We discuss our own and participants’ reflections, including the distinctive complexities and advantages of conducting participatory research online, and also the challenges of upholding an ethics of care in an online, participatory space. We highlight the time intensive nature of this work and argue that, within the academy, more needs to be done both to recognize this and to find ways to create space within it for documenting and learning from innovations in the methodology pursued. We conclude with reflections on the new possibilities that emerge when translating participatory principles to online spaces—learnings with clear relevance for others interested in pursuing these approaches.
"我觉得我是比我更伟大的一部分":纵向在线参与式研究的方法论思考
本文详细介绍了一个创新的参与式研究项目的方法论反思和对未来工作的影响,该项目始于 2020 年初英国第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间。我们反思了这个(必然的)在线参与式研究项目的实践、伦理考虑和挑战,该项目与英国低收入家庭的父母/照顾者进行了深入、长期的合作。我们讨论了这项工作的伦理-认识论基础,特别是女性主义的关爱和互惠伦理,并介绍了我们独特的方法论,详细说明了如何利用技术与全国范围内不同的父母/照护者群体合作。我们讨论了自己和参与者的反思,包括在线开展参与式研究的独特复杂性和优势,以及在在线参与式空间中坚持关爱伦理所面临的挑战。我们强调了这项工作的时间密集性,并认为在学术界需要做更多的工作,既要认识到这一点,又要想方设法在学术界创造空间,以记录和学习所追求的方法论创新。最后,我们对将参与性原则转化到网络空间时出现的新可能性进行了反思--这些经验教训对其他有意采用这些方法的人具有明显的借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书