Examination of Teachers’ Views on Erasmus+ Projects in Schools

Serap Çimşir
{"title":"Examination of Teachers’ Views on Erasmus+ Projects in Schools","authors":"Serap Çimşir","doi":"10.47836/pjssh.32.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Erasmus+ projects are important in implementing innovative approaches in the educational process. This study is designed as descriptive quantitative research to determine teachers’ opinions about Erasmus+ projects in public schools. The study group consisted of 303 teachers who voluntarily participated in the research from the population of teachers working in public schools in Istanbul. The data are collected using a questionnaire prepared by the researcher by taking expert opinions. The first part of the form, which consists of two parts, contains personal information, and the second part contains questions about teachers’ views on Erasmus+ projects in schools. ANOVA and t-tests are used to analyse the data. The findings showed that the teachers’ opinions on Erasmus+ projects did not differ significantly by gender, institution of duty, professional seniority, and educational status. Also, the teachers had positive opinions about Erasmus+ projects. In addition, the opinions on Erasmus+ projects differed significantly in favour of those who previously participated in an Erasmus+ project, those who had been abroad within the scope of an Erasmus+ project, and those who wanted to participate in Erasmus+ projects.","PeriodicalId":125431,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Erasmus+ projects are important in implementing innovative approaches in the educational process. This study is designed as descriptive quantitative research to determine teachers’ opinions about Erasmus+ projects in public schools. The study group consisted of 303 teachers who voluntarily participated in the research from the population of teachers working in public schools in Istanbul. The data are collected using a questionnaire prepared by the researcher by taking expert opinions. The first part of the form, which consists of two parts, contains personal information, and the second part contains questions about teachers’ views on Erasmus+ projects in schools. ANOVA and t-tests are used to analyse the data. The findings showed that the teachers’ opinions on Erasmus+ projects did not differ significantly by gender, institution of duty, professional seniority, and educational status. Also, the teachers had positive opinions about Erasmus+ projects. In addition, the opinions on Erasmus+ projects differed significantly in favour of those who previously participated in an Erasmus+ project, those who had been abroad within the scope of an Erasmus+ project, and those who wanted to participate in Erasmus+ projects.
考察教师对学校伊拉斯谟+项目的看法
Erasmus+ 项目对于在教育过程中实施创新方法非常重要。本研究是一项描述性定量研究,旨在了解公立学校教师对伊拉斯谟+项目的看法。研究小组由 303 名自愿参与研究的伊斯坦布尔公立学校教师组成。数据收集使用的是研究人员根据专家意见编制的调查问卷。该表格由两部分组成,第一部分包含个人信息,第二部分包含教师对学校伊拉斯谟+项目的看法问题。数据分析采用方差分析和 t 检验。结果表明,教师对伊拉斯谟+项目的看法在性别、工作单位、专业资历和教育地位方面没有明显差异。同时,教师们对伊拉斯谟+项目持积极态度。此外,曾经参加过伊拉斯谟+项目的教师、曾经在伊拉斯谟+项目范围内出国的教师和希望参加伊拉斯谟+项目的教师对伊拉斯谟+项目的看法有很大不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信