Research as a Mangrove: Emancipatory Science and the Messy Reality of Transdisciplinarity

Esther Milberg Muñiz, David Ludwig, C. El-Hani
{"title":"Research as a Mangrove: Emancipatory Science and the Messy Reality of Transdisciplinarity","authors":"Esther Milberg Muñiz, David Ludwig, C. El-Hani","doi":"10.1177/19408447241260446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the challenges of realizing the emancipatory potential of transdisciplinary research and methodology through a case study involving researchers from the Federal University of Bahia and the community of Siribinha Brazil. The project aimed to prioritize community perspectives, critical reflexivity, and dialogue between diverse knowledge systems to address social-environmental challenges. However, three core challenges emerged: 1) Power inequities often persist despite calls for participation and collaboration; 2) critical theoretical reflections do not always translate into practical actions that challenge these inequities; and 3) bridging theory and practice necessitates developing interpersonal skills and fostering care. This research highlights the fragility of transdisciplinary methodologies and emphasizes the need to address power imbalances, bridge theory and practice, and cultivate interpersonal skills and care. It contributes to discussions on implementing transdisciplinary approaches that not only address epistemic challenges but also fulfill the political ambition of benefiting disenfranchised communities.","PeriodicalId":512691,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Qualitative Research","volume":"2 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Qualitative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447241260446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the challenges of realizing the emancipatory potential of transdisciplinary research and methodology through a case study involving researchers from the Federal University of Bahia and the community of Siribinha Brazil. The project aimed to prioritize community perspectives, critical reflexivity, and dialogue between diverse knowledge systems to address social-environmental challenges. However, three core challenges emerged: 1) Power inequities often persist despite calls for participation and collaboration; 2) critical theoretical reflections do not always translate into practical actions that challenge these inequities; and 3) bridging theory and practice necessitates developing interpersonal skills and fostering care. This research highlights the fragility of transdisciplinary methodologies and emphasizes the need to address power imbalances, bridge theory and practice, and cultivate interpersonal skills and care. It contributes to discussions on implementing transdisciplinary approaches that not only address epistemic challenges but also fulfill the political ambition of benefiting disenfranchised communities.
作为红树林的研究:解放科学与跨学科的混乱现实
本研究通过一项涉及巴伊亚联邦大学研究人员和巴西西里宾哈社区的案例研究,探讨了实现跨学科研究和方法的解放潜力所面临的挑战。该项目旨在优先考虑社区视角、批判性反思以及不同知识体系之间的对话,以应对社会环境挑战。然而,在此过程中出现了三个核心挑战:1)尽管呼吁参与和合作,但权力不平等往往持续存在;2)批判性的理论反思并不总能转化为挑战这些不平等的实际行动;3)在理论和实践之间架起桥梁需要发展人际交往技能和培养关爱。这项研究凸显了跨学科方法的脆弱性,强调了解决权力不平衡、沟通理论与实践、培养人际交往技能和关爱的必要性。它有助于讨论如何实施跨学科方法,不仅应对认识论挑战,而且实现造福被剥夺权利社区的政治抱负。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书