A quantitative study of disruptive technology policy texts: An example of China’s artificial intelligence policy

Ying Zhou, Linzhi Yan, Xiao Liu
{"title":"A quantitative study of disruptive technology policy texts: An example of China’s artificial intelligence policy","authors":"Ying Zhou, Linzhi Yan, Xiao Liu","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2024-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose The transformative impact of disruptive technologies on the restructuring of the times has attracted widespread global attention. This study aims to analyze the characteristics and shortcomings of China’s artificial intelligence (AI) disruptive technology policy, and to put forward suggestions for optimizing China’s AI disruptive technology policy. Design/methodology/approach Develop a three-dimensional analytical framework for “policy tools-policy actors-policy themes” and apply policy tools, social network analysis, and LDA topic model to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the utilization of policy tools, cooperative relationships among policy actors, and the trends in policy theme settings within China’s innovative AI technology policy. Findings We find that the collaborative relationship among the policy actors of AI disruptive technology in China is insufficiently close. Marginal subjects exhibit low participation in the cooperation network and overly rely on central subjects, forming a “center-periphery” network structure. Policy tool usage is predominantly focused on supply and environmental types, with a severe inadequacy in demand-side policy tool utilization. Policy themes are diverse, encompassing topics such as “Intelligent Services” “Talent Cultivation” “Information Security” and “Technological Innovation”, which will remain focal points. Under the themes of “Intelligent Services” and “Intelligent Governance”, policy tool usage is relatively balanced, with close collaboration among policy entities. However, the theme of “AI Theoretical System” lacks a comprehensive understanding of tool usage and necessitates enhanced cooperation with other policy entities. Research limitations The data sources and experimental scope are subject to certain limitations, potentially introducing biases and imperfections into the research results, necessitating further validation and refinement. Practical implications The study introduces a three-dimensional analysis framework for disruptive technology policy texts, which is significant for formulating and enhancing disruptive technology policies. Originality/value This study utilizes text mining and content analysis techniques to quantitatively analyze disruptive technology policy texts. It systematically evaluates China’s AI policies quantitatively, focusing on policy tools, policy actors, policy themes. The study uncovers the characteristics and deficiencies of current AI policies, offering recommendations for formulating and enhancing disruptive technology policies.","PeriodicalId":515322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Science","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The transformative impact of disruptive technologies on the restructuring of the times has attracted widespread global attention. This study aims to analyze the characteristics and shortcomings of China’s artificial intelligence (AI) disruptive technology policy, and to put forward suggestions for optimizing China’s AI disruptive technology policy. Design/methodology/approach Develop a three-dimensional analytical framework for “policy tools-policy actors-policy themes” and apply policy tools, social network analysis, and LDA topic model to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the utilization of policy tools, cooperative relationships among policy actors, and the trends in policy theme settings within China’s innovative AI technology policy. Findings We find that the collaborative relationship among the policy actors of AI disruptive technology in China is insufficiently close. Marginal subjects exhibit low participation in the cooperation network and overly rely on central subjects, forming a “center-periphery” network structure. Policy tool usage is predominantly focused on supply and environmental types, with a severe inadequacy in demand-side policy tool utilization. Policy themes are diverse, encompassing topics such as “Intelligent Services” “Talent Cultivation” “Information Security” and “Technological Innovation”, which will remain focal points. Under the themes of “Intelligent Services” and “Intelligent Governance”, policy tool usage is relatively balanced, with close collaboration among policy entities. However, the theme of “AI Theoretical System” lacks a comprehensive understanding of tool usage and necessitates enhanced cooperation with other policy entities. Research limitations The data sources and experimental scope are subject to certain limitations, potentially introducing biases and imperfections into the research results, necessitating further validation and refinement. Practical implications The study introduces a three-dimensional analysis framework for disruptive technology policy texts, which is significant for formulating and enhancing disruptive technology policies. Originality/value This study utilizes text mining and content analysis techniques to quantitatively analyze disruptive technology policy texts. It systematically evaluates China’s AI policies quantitatively, focusing on policy tools, policy actors, policy themes. The study uncovers the characteristics and deficiencies of current AI policies, offering recommendations for formulating and enhancing disruptive technology policies.
颠覆性技术政策文本的定量研究:以中国人工智能政策为例
摘要 目的 颠覆性技术对时代结构调整的变革性影响已引起全球广泛关注。本研究旨在分析中国人工智能(AI)颠覆性技术政策的特点与不足,并提出优化中国人工智能颠覆性技术政策的建议。设计/方法/途径 建立 "政策工具-政策行动者-政策主题 "三维分析框架,运用政策工具、社会网络分析和 LDA 主题模型,对中国人工智能颠覆性技术政策中政策工具的运用、政策行动者之间的合作关系以及政策主题设置的趋势进行综合分析。研究结果 我们发现,中国人工智能颠覆性技术政策主体间的合作关系不够紧密。边缘主体在合作网络中的参与度低,过度依赖中心主体,形成了 "中心-边缘 "的网络结构。政策工具使用主要集中在供给和环境类型,需求侧政策工具使用严重不足。政策主题多元化,包括 "智能服务""人才培养""信息安全 "和 "技术创新 "等主题,这些主题仍将是重点。在 "智能服务 "和 "智能治理 "主题下,政策工具的使用相对均衡,各政策主体之间合作密切。然而,"人工智能理论体系 "主题缺乏对工具使用情况的全面了解,需要加强与其他政策实体的合作。研究局限性 数据来源和实验范围存在一定局限性,可能会给研究结果带来偏差和不完善,需要进一步验证和完善。实践意义 本研究引入了颠覆性技术政策文本的三维分析框架,对制定和完善颠覆性技术政策具有重要意义。原创性/价值 本研究利用文本挖掘和内容分析技术对颠覆性技术政策文本进行定量分析。它从政策工具、政策参与者、政策主题等方面对中国的人工智能政策进行了系统的定量评估。研究揭示了当前人工智能政策的特点和不足,为制定和完善颠覆性技术政策提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信