Energy use pattern in rose onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivation

IF 0.2 Q4 HORTICULTURE
G. Senthil Kumaran, A. Carolin Rathinakumari, S. A. Venu, A. R. Surendra
{"title":"Energy use pattern in rose onion (Allium cepa L.) cultivation","authors":"G. Senthil Kumaran, A. Carolin Rathinakumari, S. A. Venu, A. R. Surendra","doi":"10.24154/rkjzh135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was conducted to analyse the energy use pattern for cultivation and on farm processing of rose onion (Allium cepa L.). The energy auditing data was collected by stratified random sampling method using a face- to-face interaction at Sadali (Hobli), Sidlaghatta, Chikkaballapur, Karnataka. In this region, the energy utilized for different package of practices followed for rose onion cultivation by conventional practice are land preparation (5-tyne cultivator, 9-tyne cultivator and rotovator), sowing (broadcasting), thinning (manual), manure & fertilizer application (manual), plant protection {weeding (manual and chemical spray), chemical spraying (battery operated sprayer)}, irrigation (micro-irrigation), harvesting (manual) and detopping (manual). The energy use pattern for the above-mentioned various package of practices were found to be 4,207.95±37.21, 664.66±17.68, 53.31±2.68, 22,522.92±385.07, 2,534.40±155.55, 14,980.51±229.49, 807.74±20.80 and 1,571.75±42.77 MJ ha-1, respectively. The input energy, output energy and energy ratio were calculated as 47,343.23±484.65, 38,131.12±462.48 MJ ha-1 and 0.81±0.01, respectively. The energy intensive operation identified was manure and fertilizer application (fertilizer 46.80%; men 0.77%) both indirect and direct energy sources, followed by irrigation (electricity 31.09%; men 0.55%), land preparation (diesel 8.33%) and pesticide application (pesticide 4.53%). It is concluded that the fertilizer, electricity and diesel utilised in rose onion cultivation needs to be optimally minimised through management practices.","PeriodicalId":36766,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Horticultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Horticultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24154/rkjzh135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was conducted to analyse the energy use pattern for cultivation and on farm processing of rose onion (Allium cepa L.). The energy auditing data was collected by stratified random sampling method using a face- to-face interaction at Sadali (Hobli), Sidlaghatta, Chikkaballapur, Karnataka. In this region, the energy utilized for different package of practices followed for rose onion cultivation by conventional practice are land preparation (5-tyne cultivator, 9-tyne cultivator and rotovator), sowing (broadcasting), thinning (manual), manure & fertilizer application (manual), plant protection {weeding (manual and chemical spray), chemical spraying (battery operated sprayer)}, irrigation (micro-irrigation), harvesting (manual) and detopping (manual). The energy use pattern for the above-mentioned various package of practices were found to be 4,207.95±37.21, 664.66±17.68, 53.31±2.68, 22,522.92±385.07, 2,534.40±155.55, 14,980.51±229.49, 807.74±20.80 and 1,571.75±42.77 MJ ha-1, respectively. The input energy, output energy and energy ratio were calculated as 47,343.23±484.65, 38,131.12±462.48 MJ ha-1 and 0.81±0.01, respectively. The energy intensive operation identified was manure and fertilizer application (fertilizer 46.80%; men 0.77%) both indirect and direct energy sources, followed by irrigation (electricity 31.09%; men 0.55%), land preparation (diesel 8.33%) and pesticide application (pesticide 4.53%). It is concluded that the fertilizer, electricity and diesel utilised in rose onion cultivation needs to be optimally minimised through management practices.
玫瑰葱(Allium cepa L.)种植的能源使用模式
研究分析了玫瑰葱(Allium cepa L.)种植和农场加工的能源使用模式。能源审计数据是通过分层随机抽样法,在卡纳塔克邦 Chikkaballapur 的 Sadali(Hobli)、Sidlaghatta 和 Chikkaballapur 进行面对面交流收集的。在该地区,采用传统方法种植玫瑰洋葱时,不同的整套耕作法所使用的能源包括:整地(5 针耕作机、9 针耕作机和旋耕机)、播种(播种)、疏苗(人工)、施肥(人工)、植保{除草(人工和化学喷雾)、化学喷雾(电池驱动喷雾器)}、灌溉(微灌)、收割(人工)和去梗(人工)。上述各种方法的能源使用模式分别为 4,207.95±37.21, 664.66±17.68, 53.31±2.68, 22,522.92±385.07, 2,534.40±155.55, 14,980.51±229.49, 807.74±20.80 和 1,571.75±42.77 MJ ha-1。输入能量、输出能量和能量比分别为 47,343.23±484.65 兆焦耳/公顷、38,131.12±462.48 兆焦耳/公顷和 0.81±0.01。确定的高能耗作业是施肥(化肥 46.80%;男性 0.77%),包括间接和直接能源,其次是灌溉(电力 31.09%;男性 0.55%)、整地(柴油 8.33%)和施药(农药 4.53%)。由此得出结论,玫瑰葱种植过程中使用的化肥、电力和柴油需要通过管理措施最大限度地减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Horticultural Sciences
Journal of Horticultural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信