Comparison of Ensemble Method Performance in Classifying Blood Sugar Levels Output from Non-Invasive Device

Alfi Indah Nurrizqi, Erfiani, Agus Mohamad Soleh
{"title":"Comparison of Ensemble Method Performance in Classifying Blood Sugar Levels Output from Non-Invasive Device","authors":"Alfi Indah Nurrizqi, Erfiani, Agus Mohamad Soleh","doi":"10.32628/ijsrset2411322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a persistent health issue in many countries and is a leading cause of heart disease, kidney failure, and blindness The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated in 2019 that at least 463 million people worldwide aged 20-79 suffer from diabetes. This number is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. Machine learning is a type of machine learning that is very helpful in various fields, including healthcare. In classification cases, ensemble methods classify by combining decisions from several other models, one way being through majority voting. Ensemble methods often produce more accurate classification or prediction results. Several ensemble methods include random forest, extra trees, rotation forest, and double random forest. The data used in this study is part of research on the development and clinical testing of a prototype non-invasive blood glucose monitoring device by the non-invasive biomarking team at IPB. The data includes both invasive and non-invasive blood glucose measurements collected in 2019. This study compares the performance of the random forest, extra trees, rotation forest, and double random forest models on blood glucose level data obtained from non-invasive devices. The research results show that the Rotation Forest algorithm is the best model, with the highest average accuracy compared to the other three algorithms, achieving an accuracy level of 0.7142857 (71.42%).","PeriodicalId":14228,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology","volume":"105 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32628/ijsrset2411322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a persistent health issue in many countries and is a leading cause of heart disease, kidney failure, and blindness The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimated in 2019 that at least 463 million people worldwide aged 20-79 suffer from diabetes. This number is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. Machine learning is a type of machine learning that is very helpful in various fields, including healthcare. In classification cases, ensemble methods classify by combining decisions from several other models, one way being through majority voting. Ensemble methods often produce more accurate classification or prediction results. Several ensemble methods include random forest, extra trees, rotation forest, and double random forest. The data used in this study is part of research on the development and clinical testing of a prototype non-invasive blood glucose monitoring device by the non-invasive biomarking team at IPB. The data includes both invasive and non-invasive blood glucose measurements collected in 2019. This study compares the performance of the random forest, extra trees, rotation forest, and double random forest models on blood glucose level data obtained from non-invasive devices. The research results show that the Rotation Forest algorithm is the best model, with the highest average accuracy compared to the other three algorithms, achieving an accuracy level of 0.7142857 (71.42%).
非侵入式设备输出的血糖水平分类组合方法性能比较
据国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)2019 年估计,全球 20-79 岁年龄段至少有 4.63 亿人患有糖尿病。预计到 2030 年,这一数字将增至 5.78 亿,到 2045 年将增至 7 亿。机器学习是机器学习的一种,在包括医疗保健在内的各个领域都非常有用。在分类案例中,集合方法通过综合其他几个模型的决定进行分类,其中一种方法是通过多数投票。集合方法通常能产生更准确的分类或预测结果。几种集合方法包括随机森林、额外树、旋转森林和双随机森林。本研究使用的数据是 IPB 无创生物标记团队开发和临床测试无创血糖监测设备原型研究的一部分。数据包括 2019 年收集的有创和无创血糖测量值。本研究比较了随机森林、额外树、旋转森林和双随机森林模型在从无创设备获取的血糖水平数据上的性能。研究结果表明,旋转森林算法是最好的模型,与其他三种算法相比,平均准确率最高,达到了 0.7142857(71.42%)的准确率水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信