Ontologie, Semantik, Logik oder Erkenntnistheorie der Substanz? Zwischen Aristoteles, der Analytischen Philosophie und Kant

R. Enskat
{"title":"Ontologie, Semantik, Logik oder Erkenntnistheorie der Substanz? Zwischen Aristoteles, der Analytischen Philosophie und Kant","authors":"R. Enskat","doi":"10.3196/004433024838744240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the long history of the substance–problem – from Aristotle to e.g. David Wiggins – very different analytical approaches have fostered its deepening and its clearing step by step. Not only titular Analytical Philosophers, also Analytical Philosophers avant la\n lettre, e.g. Kant, have contributed to this kind of approach. In the following text it is to be shown how these contributions switch fruitfully between ontological, semantical (res. grammatical), epistemological and logical aspects.","PeriodicalId":296243,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung","volume":"113 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3196/004433024838744240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the long history of the substance–problem – from Aristotle to e.g. David Wiggins – very different analytical approaches have fostered its deepening and its clearing step by step. Not only titular Analytical Philosophers, also Analytical Philosophers avant la lettre, e.g. Kant, have contributed to this kind of approach. In the following text it is to be shown how these contributions switch fruitfully between ontological, semantical (res. grammatical), epistemological and logical aspects.
本体论、语义学、逻辑学还是物质认识论?在亚里士多德、分析哲学和康德之间
在物质问题的漫长历史中--从亚里士多德到大卫-维金斯等人--非常不同的分析方法促进了这一问题的逐步深化和澄清。不仅是名义上的分析哲学家,前分析哲学家,如康德,也为这种方法做出了贡献。下文将说明这些贡献是如何在本体论、语义学(即语法)、认识论和逻辑学之间进行卓有成效的转换的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信