Comparative effectiveness of treatments on time to remission in atopic dermatitis: real-world insights

E. Sato, Hisatomi Arima, Kotaro Ito, Mayuko Iwata, Shinichi Imafuku
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of treatments on time to remission in atopic dermatitis: real-world insights","authors":"E. Sato, Hisatomi Arima, Kotaro Ito, Mayuko Iwata, Shinichi Imafuku","doi":"10.3389/jcia.2024.12974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It remains unclear which therapy contributes to atopic dermatitis (AD) remission and to what extent. We aimed to clarify which therapy contributes to the treatment of AD by investigating the time-to-remission and remission hazard ratios for each therapy using real-world data.This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients diagnosed with AD after their first visit to the Department of Dermatology at Fukuoka University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. The patients were categorized into six treatment groups: 1) topical treatment alone or topical treatment plus 2) ultraviolet light, 3) oral steroids, 4) oral cyclosporine, 5) dupilumab, and 6) oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The topical therapy alone group served as the control, and the hazard ratios for remission (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1) were calculated.Forty patients achieved remission, while 70 did not (IGA ≥2) with the first treatment regimen. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, and severity at the first visit (IGA) revealed that the hazard ratios for remission were 4.2 (95% confidence interval (C.I.): 1.28–13.83, p = 0.018) for the oral cyclosporine group, 5.05 (95% C.I.: 1.96–13, p = 0.001) for the dupilumab group, and 67.56 (95% C.I.: 12.28–371.68, p < .0001) for the oral JAKi group. The median time to remission was 3 months for JAKi, cyclosporine, and steroid was shorter than 6 months for dupilumab. No serious adverse events were observed.Oral therapy with small molecules requires a shorter duration to achieve remission. However, long-term safety and recurrence are important indicators.","PeriodicalId":508694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy","volume":"114 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Immunology and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jcia.2024.12974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It remains unclear which therapy contributes to atopic dermatitis (AD) remission and to what extent. We aimed to clarify which therapy contributes to the treatment of AD by investigating the time-to-remission and remission hazard ratios for each therapy using real-world data.This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients diagnosed with AD after their first visit to the Department of Dermatology at Fukuoka University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. The patients were categorized into six treatment groups: 1) topical treatment alone or topical treatment plus 2) ultraviolet light, 3) oral steroids, 4) oral cyclosporine, 5) dupilumab, and 6) oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The topical therapy alone group served as the control, and the hazard ratios for remission (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1) were calculated.Forty patients achieved remission, while 70 did not (IGA ≥2) with the first treatment regimen. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, and severity at the first visit (IGA) revealed that the hazard ratios for remission were 4.2 (95% confidence interval (C.I.): 1.28–13.83, p = 0.018) for the oral cyclosporine group, 5.05 (95% C.I.: 1.96–13, p = 0.001) for the dupilumab group, and 67.56 (95% C.I.: 12.28–371.68, p < .0001) for the oral JAKi group. The median time to remission was 3 months for JAKi, cyclosporine, and steroid was shorter than 6 months for dupilumab. No serious adverse events were observed.Oral therapy with small molecules requires a shorter duration to achieve remission. However, long-term safety and recurrence are important indicators.
特应性皮炎缓解时间的疗效比较:真实世界的启示
目前仍不清楚哪种疗法有助于特应性皮炎(AD)的缓解以及缓解的程度。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年至2022年期间在福冈大学医院皮肤科首次就诊后确诊为特应性皮炎的110名患者。患者被分为六个治疗组:1)单纯局部治疗或局部治疗加 2)紫外线照射;3)口服类固醇;4)口服环孢素;5)杜匹单抗;6)口服 Janus 激酶抑制剂(JAKi)。单用局部疗法组作为对照组,计算缓解的危险比(研究者总体评估[IGA] 0/1)。根据年龄、性别和首次就诊时的严重程度(IGA)调整后进行的多变量考克斯比例危险分析显示,缓解的危险比为 4.2(95% 置信区间 (C.I.):1.28-13.83,p.0):口服环孢素组的缓解危险比为4.2(95% 置信区间(C.I.):1.28-13.83,p = 0.018),口服JAKi组的缓解危险比为5.05(95% 置信区间(C.I.):1.96-13,p = 0.001),口服JAKi组的缓解危险比为67.56(95% 置信区间(C.I.):12.28-371.68,p < .0001)。JAKi、环孢素和类固醇的中位缓解时间为3个月,而杜比单抗的中位缓解时间短于6个月。小分子口服疗法需要更短的时间才能达到缓解。然而,长期安全性和复发率是重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信