A reproducible method for evaluating the degree and direction of overstuffing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Eric J Panther, Kevin A. Hao, Matthew R. Patrick, Joseph J. King, Thomas W. Wright, Aimee M. Struk, Jonathan O. Wright, Bradley S. Schoch
{"title":"A reproducible method for evaluating the degree and direction of overstuffing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Eric J Panther, Kevin A. Hao, Matthew R. Patrick, Joseph J. King, Thomas W. Wright, Aimee M. Struk, Jonathan O. Wright, Bradley S. Schoch","doi":"10.1177/17585732241258069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improper sizing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) can overstuff the joint, potentially compromising outcomes. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method of evaluating glenohumeral joint overstuffing in which superoinferior and mediolateral overstuffing can be evaluated independently relative to the native humeral anatomy. We identified 25 patients who underwent ATSA and the best Grashey radiograph taken within 1 year of follow-up was assessed using our proposed technique. First, a circle overlaying the implanted humeral head was made. Then, Iannotti's Perfect Circle (IPC) was drawn as originally described. Measurements of superior and medial overstuffing were made using our proposed axes. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) using a one-way model. Measurements were summarized as the mean and range, with positive values denoting overstuffing. The inter-rater reliability for all measurements was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Compared to our method, the IPC method would have missed 77% of overstuffed cases. We present a reproducible method to assess glenohumeral joint overstuffing in ATSA. This technique addresses limitations of other methods that underestimate overstuffing. Further study is needed to establish a clinically significant value of overstuffing based on the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":507613,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder & Elbow","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder & Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241258069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improper sizing of the humeral head component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) can overstuff the joint, potentially compromising outcomes. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method of evaluating glenohumeral joint overstuffing in which superoinferior and mediolateral overstuffing can be evaluated independently relative to the native humeral anatomy. We identified 25 patients who underwent ATSA and the best Grashey radiograph taken within 1 year of follow-up was assessed using our proposed technique. First, a circle overlaying the implanted humeral head was made. Then, Iannotti's Perfect Circle (IPC) was drawn as originally described. Measurements of superior and medial overstuffing were made using our proposed axes. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by computing interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) using a one-way model. Measurements were summarized as the mean and range, with positive values denoting overstuffing. The inter-rater reliability for all measurements was excellent (ICC > 0.9). Compared to our method, the IPC method would have missed 77% of overstuffed cases. We present a reproducible method to assess glenohumeral joint overstuffing in ATSA. This technique addresses limitations of other methods that underestimate overstuffing. Further study is needed to establish a clinically significant value of overstuffing based on the proposed method.
评估解剖型全肩关节成形术中肱骨头组件过度充填程度和方向的可重复方法
在解剖型全肩关节成形术(ATSA)中,肱骨头组件的尺寸选择不当会造成关节过度充血,从而影响手术效果。本研究的目的是验证一种评估盂肱关节过度充盈的新方法,该方法可根据肱骨的原生解剖结构独立评估上内侧和内外侧的过度充盈情况。我们确定了 25 位接受 ATSA 的患者,并使用我们提出的技术对随访 1 年内拍摄的最佳 Grashey X 光片进行了评估。首先,在植入的肱骨头上画一圈。然后,按照最初的描述绘制 Iannotti's Perfect Circle (IPC)。使用我们提出的坐标轴测量上部和内侧过度膨胀。使用单向模型计算类间相关系数 (ICC),评估评分者之间的可靠性。测量结果汇总为平均值和范围,正值表示过度充气。所有测量的评分者间可靠性都非常好(ICC > 0.9)。与我们的方法相比,IPC 方法会漏掉 77% 的过度充气病例。我们提出了一种可重复的方法来评估 ATSA 中的盂肱关节过度充气情况。该技术解决了其他方法低估过度充气的局限性。要根据所提出的方法确定具有临床意义的过度充气值,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信