E-Learning in Anatomy: Medical Students' Perspectives on Synchronous and Asynchronous Lab Sessions

Ryzufar Altarif Farsal, Nandina Oktavia, Gita Tiara Dewi Nasution, Putri Halleyana Adrikni Rahman
{"title":"E-Learning in Anatomy: Medical Students' Perspectives on Synchronous and Asynchronous Lab Sessions","authors":"Ryzufar Altarif Farsal, Nandina Oktavia, Gita Tiara Dewi Nasution, Putri Halleyana Adrikni Rahman","doi":"10.22146/jpki.82355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has become a global health disaster, various sectors have been affected including the education sector. Online learning is then carried out as an alternative solution to carry out learning. This online learning is carried out in all elements of education including Universities. The intended online learning is divided into two methods, asynchronous and synchronous methods. The difference in these methods will certainly lead to different perceptions for each student, especially in anatomy laboratory learning.This stud aimed to find out the perception of Unpad Medical Faculty students towards the asynchronous and synchronous method of online anatomy laboratory learning..Methods:This research is a quantitative cross-sectional descriptive studies and involved 129 respondents from student of Unpad Faculty of Medicine students class of 2019. This was done using Google Forms which contained a questionnaire and informed consent sheet.Results: FK Unpad online anatomy laboratory learning falls under good category, with each index value: perception of learning experience: 76.2%, perception of lecturer capabilities: 77.1%, perception of facilities and infrastructure: 83.7 %.Conclusion: Online anatomy laboratory learning can still be continued by combining both asynchronous and synchronous methods, so that learning can take place more effectively.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.82355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has become a global health disaster, various sectors have been affected including the education sector. Online learning is then carried out as an alternative solution to carry out learning. This online learning is carried out in all elements of education including Universities. The intended online learning is divided into two methods, asynchronous and synchronous methods. The difference in these methods will certainly lead to different perceptions for each student, especially in anatomy laboratory learning.This stud aimed to find out the perception of Unpad Medical Faculty students towards the asynchronous and synchronous method of online anatomy laboratory learning..Methods:This research is a quantitative cross-sectional descriptive studies and involved 129 respondents from student of Unpad Faculty of Medicine students class of 2019. This was done using Google Forms which contained a questionnaire and informed consent sheet.Results: FK Unpad online anatomy laboratory learning falls under good category, with each index value: perception of learning experience: 76.2%, perception of lecturer capabilities: 77.1%, perception of facilities and infrastructure: 83.7 %.Conclusion: Online anatomy laboratory learning can still be continued by combining both asynchronous and synchronous methods, so that learning can take place more effectively.
解剖学电子学习:医学生对同步和异步实验课的看法
背景:Covid-19 大流行已成为一场全球性的健康灾难,各行各业都受到了影响,包括教育部门。于是,在线学习作为一种替代性学习方案应运而生。这种在线学习在包括大学在内的所有教育领域都有开展。在线学习分为异步和同步两种方法。本研究旨在了解Unpad医学院学生对异步和同步在线解剖实验学习方法的看法。方法:本研究是一项定量横截面描述性研究,涉及129名来自Unpad医学院2019级学生的受访者。研究使用谷歌表格进行,其中包含调查问卷和知情同意书:FK Unpad在线解剖实验室学习属于良好类别,各项指标值分别为:学习体验感知76.2%,讲师感知76.2%,学习体验感知76.2%,学习体验感知76.2%:76.2%,对讲师能力的感知:77.1%,对设施和设备的感知:76.2%,对讲师能力的感知:77.1结论:在线解剖实验室学习仍可继续:结论:在线解剖实验室学习仍可通过结合异步和同步两种方法继续进行,以便更有效地开展学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信