«Impressions of a jurer» by G.S.N. as a source for studying the Russian jury trial of the late XIXth century

Alexey A. Demichev
{"title":"«Impressions of a jurer» by G.S.N. as a source for studying the Russian jury trial of the late XIXth century","authors":"Alexey A. Demichev","doi":"10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-2-316-328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The document Impressions of a Juror is analyzed as a personal account of an anonymous author, G.S.N., who recounted his experiences as a juror in legal proceedings in the Russian Empire in the late 19th century. Both external and internal criticism of the source is conducted, facilitating the establishment of the approximate place, time, and purpose of its creation. Furthemore, the socio-psychological portrait of the author is reconstructed, considering aspects such as social affiliation, level of education, place of residence, and certain psychological characteristics. The analysis acknowledges the uniqueness of Impressions of a Juror, which not being a part of mainstream historical sources, remain a distinctive work. On the other hand, it shares characteristics inherent in other personal documents from jurors of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 19th century, particularly regarding its general character, presentation style, and the scope of covered issues. It is noted that the factual value of the source under consideration is limited, as it does not allow for the comprehensive reconstruction of the judiciary and legal proceedings in the Russian Empire, nor does it facilitate a complete understanding of the criminal cases under consideration. Despite these limitations, the conclusion is drawn that Impressions of a Juror holds cognitive value due to its provision of information not found in other historical sources. The document offers details that breathe like into the specifics that were previously only studied on the basis on normative legal texts, and official statistics. Thus while the source may not provide an all-encompassing view of the legal landscate of the Russian Empire, it contributes a unique perspective that enriches the understanding of historical proceedings.","PeriodicalId":32648,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Law","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-2-316-328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The document Impressions of a Juror is analyzed as a personal account of an anonymous author, G.S.N., who recounted his experiences as a juror in legal proceedings in the Russian Empire in the late 19th century. Both external and internal criticism of the source is conducted, facilitating the establishment of the approximate place, time, and purpose of its creation. Furthemore, the socio-psychological portrait of the author is reconstructed, considering aspects such as social affiliation, level of education, place of residence, and certain psychological characteristics. The analysis acknowledges the uniqueness of Impressions of a Juror, which not being a part of mainstream historical sources, remain a distinctive work. On the other hand, it shares characteristics inherent in other personal documents from jurors of the Russian Empire in the second half of the 19th century, particularly regarding its general character, presentation style, and the scope of covered issues. It is noted that the factual value of the source under consideration is limited, as it does not allow for the comprehensive reconstruction of the judiciary and legal proceedings in the Russian Empire, nor does it facilitate a complete understanding of the criminal cases under consideration. Despite these limitations, the conclusion is drawn that Impressions of a Juror holds cognitive value due to its provision of information not found in other historical sources. The document offers details that breathe like into the specifics that were previously only studied on the basis on normative legal texts, and official statistics. Thus while the source may not provide an all-encompassing view of the legal landscate of the Russian Empire, it contributes a unique perspective that enriches the understanding of historical proceedings.
"G.S.N. 的《法官印象》是研究十九世纪末俄罗斯陪审团审判的资料来源
文件《一个陪审员的印象》被分析为匿名作者 G.S.N. 的个人记述,他讲述了自己在 19 世纪末俄罗斯帝国法律诉讼中担任陪审员的经历。对该资料进行了外部和内部批判,有助于确定其大致的创作地点、时间和目的。此外,考虑到作者的社会归属、教育水平、居住地和某些心理特征等方面,还重建了作者的社会心理肖像。分析承认了《陪审员印象》的独特性,因为它不属于主流历史资料,仍然是一部与众不同的作品。另一方面,它也具有 19 世纪下半叶俄罗斯帝国其他陪审员个人文件的固有特征,尤其是在总体特征、表述风格和涉及问题的范围方面。需要指出的是,所审议的资料来源的事实价值有限,因为它无法全面重建俄罗斯帝国的司法和法律程序,也不利于全面了解所审议的刑事案件。尽管存在这些局限性,但由于《陪审员印象》提供了其他历史资料中没有的信息,因此得出的结论是,它具有认知价值。该文件提供了一些细节,使人们得以深入了解以前只能根据规范性法律文本和官方统计数据进行研究的具体情况。因此,虽然该资料可能无法提供俄罗斯帝国法律领域的全貌,但它提供了一个独特的视角,丰富了人们对历史诉讼的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信