Examining classroom learning behaviors academic and athletic motivation in collegiate athletes

Kayleigh Hart, Leilani Madrigal, Alison Ede, Jana Fogaca
{"title":"Examining classroom learning behaviors academic and athletic motivation in collegiate athletes","authors":"Kayleigh Hart, Leilani Madrigal, Alison Ede, Jana Fogaca","doi":"10.17161/jis.v17i2.21308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"College student-athletes balance the demands of both sport and school in the context of higher education; high levels of motivation are necessary for success in both spaces. Studies have evaluated learning styles and academic motivational outcomes in college student athletes but there is a need to explore how motivation impacts both academic and athletic success. The present study examined the relationship academic, student athletic, and career athletic motivation had with learning styles and major (STEM vs. non-STEM) using Self-Determination Theory as the theoretical lens. College Division I, II, III, and Club college athletes took the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scale and Student Athletes Motivation toward Sports and Academics Questionnaire. Learning styles were grouped into intrinsic (independent, participant, and collaborative) and extrinsic (dependent, avoidant, and competitive) styles. There were positive relationships between intrinsic learning style and both student athletic (r(147) = .19, p = .02) and academic (r(147) = .30, p < .001) motivation. Extrinsic learning style was positively correlated with career athletic (r(147) = .27, p = .001) and student athletic (r(147) = .16, p < .05) motivation but negatively corelated with academic motivation (r(147) = -.17, p = .03). Athletes in STEM majors (M = 3.88, SD = 0.36) had significantly higher academic motivation than non-STEM majors (M = 3.66, SD = 0.40), t(182) = 3.85, p < .001. Athletes in non-STEM majors (M = 4.00, SD = 0.88) had significantly higher career athletic motivation than STEM majors (M = 3.56, SD = 0.91), t(182) = -3.29, p = .001. Findings suggest being more independent, participant, and collaborative in class is related to motivation both in school and in student athletic endeavors. Athletes pursuing a STEM major may show higher academic motivation than athletes pursuing non-STEM majors. Encouraging student-athlete learning autonomy via education/intervention could improve intrinsic motivation in sport and classes, though further exploration of these factors is necessary to fully understand their relationship in college student-athletes.","PeriodicalId":354349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","volume":"63 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercollegiate Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v17i2.21308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College student-athletes balance the demands of both sport and school in the context of higher education; high levels of motivation are necessary for success in both spaces. Studies have evaluated learning styles and academic motivational outcomes in college student athletes but there is a need to explore how motivation impacts both academic and athletic success. The present study examined the relationship academic, student athletic, and career athletic motivation had with learning styles and major (STEM vs. non-STEM) using Self-Determination Theory as the theoretical lens. College Division I, II, III, and Club college athletes took the Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scale and Student Athletes Motivation toward Sports and Academics Questionnaire. Learning styles were grouped into intrinsic (independent, participant, and collaborative) and extrinsic (dependent, avoidant, and competitive) styles. There were positive relationships between intrinsic learning style and both student athletic (r(147) = .19, p = .02) and academic (r(147) = .30, p < .001) motivation. Extrinsic learning style was positively correlated with career athletic (r(147) = .27, p = .001) and student athletic (r(147) = .16, p < .05) motivation but negatively corelated with academic motivation (r(147) = -.17, p = .03). Athletes in STEM majors (M = 3.88, SD = 0.36) had significantly higher academic motivation than non-STEM majors (M = 3.66, SD = 0.40), t(182) = 3.85, p < .001. Athletes in non-STEM majors (M = 4.00, SD = 0.88) had significantly higher career athletic motivation than STEM majors (M = 3.56, SD = 0.91), t(182) = -3.29, p = .001. Findings suggest being more independent, participant, and collaborative in class is related to motivation both in school and in student athletic endeavors. Athletes pursuing a STEM major may show higher academic motivation than athletes pursuing non-STEM majors. Encouraging student-athlete learning autonomy via education/intervention could improve intrinsic motivation in sport and classes, though further exploration of these factors is necessary to fully understand their relationship in college student-athletes.
研究大学生运动员的课堂学习行为、学术和运动动机
大学生运动员在接受高等教育的过程中要兼顾体育和学业的要求;要想在这两个方面都取得成功,就必须有高水平的学习动机。已有研究对大学生运动员的学习风格和学习动机结果进行了评估,但仍有必要探讨学习动机如何影响学业和运动的成功。本研究以 "自我决定理论 "为理论视角,考察了学业、学生运动和职业运动动机与学习风格和专业(STEM 与非 STEM)之间的关系。大学一、二、三组和俱乐部的大学生运动员参加了 Grasha-Reichmann Student Learning Style Scale 和 Student Athletes Motivation toward Sports and Academics Questionnaire 的问卷调查。学习风格被分为内在型(独立型、参与型和合作型)和外在型(依赖型、回避型和竞争型)。内在学习风格与学生的运动(r(147) = .19,p = .02)和学习(r(147) = .30,p < .001)动机之间存在正相关。外在学习风格与职业运动(r(147) = .27,p = .001)和学生运动(r(147) = .16,p < .05)动机呈正相关,但与学习动机呈负相关(r(147) = -.17,p = .03)。STEM 专业运动员(M = 3.88,SD = 0.36)的学习动机明显高于非 STEM 专业运动员(M = 3.66,SD = 0.40),t(182) = 3.85,p < .001。非 STEM 专业运动员(M = 4.00,SD = 0.88)的职业运动动机明显高于 STEM 专业运动员(M = 3.56,SD = 0.91),t(182) = -3.29,p = .001。研究结果表明,在课堂上更加独立、参与和合作与学生在学校和体育运动中的积极性有关。与学习非 STEM 专业的运动员相比,学习 STEM 专业的运动员可能会表现出更高的学习动机。通过教育/干预来鼓励学生运动员的学习自主性,可以提高他们在体育运动和课程中的内在动力,但要充分了解这些因素在大学生运动员中的关系,还需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信