Queered approach for Latinx LGBTQ+ culturally responsive evaluation practice

Q2 Social Sciences
David Edward García, Esrea Perez‐Bill, D. Felt, Erik Elías Glenn, Gregory Phillips
{"title":"Queered approach for Latinx LGBTQ+ culturally responsive evaluation practice","authors":"David Edward García, Esrea Perez‐Bill, D. Felt, Erik Elías Glenn, Gregory Phillips","doi":"10.1002/ev.20590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation with Latinx LGBTQ+ communities calls for a culturally responsive and equity‐based approach that appreciates the rich diversity of experiences within the grouping “Latinx LGBTQ+.” Recent advancements in Latino Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) in Evaluation and LGBTQ+ Evaluation, as well as rich historical genealogies of feminisms of color within Queer Theory offer valuable insights for evaluators working with Latinx LGBTQ+ communities. This article encourages embracing a “queered” approach to LatCrit, which meaningfully delves into the complexities of these experiences and attunes itself to the experiences and nuances of trauma. A Queered LatCrit emphasizes the importance of creating a safe and empowering context that acknowledges historical trauma and oppression, while simultaneously refusing deficit‐based frames and engaging the strengths and assets of in‐betweenness. Touching on historical, cultural, and methodological considerations, we argue for evaluations that recognize the unique challenges faced by Latinx LGBTQ+ communities while calling for evaluation practices rooted in culturally responsive, empowerment, and transformative traditions.","PeriodicalId":35250,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Evaluation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation with Latinx LGBTQ+ communities calls for a culturally responsive and equity‐based approach that appreciates the rich diversity of experiences within the grouping “Latinx LGBTQ+.” Recent advancements in Latino Critical Race Theory (LatCrit) in Evaluation and LGBTQ+ Evaluation, as well as rich historical genealogies of feminisms of color within Queer Theory offer valuable insights for evaluators working with Latinx LGBTQ+ communities. This article encourages embracing a “queered” approach to LatCrit, which meaningfully delves into the complexities of these experiences and attunes itself to the experiences and nuances of trauma. A Queered LatCrit emphasizes the importance of creating a safe and empowering context that acknowledges historical trauma and oppression, while simultaneously refusing deficit‐based frames and engaging the strengths and assets of in‐betweenness. Touching on historical, cultural, and methodological considerations, we argue for evaluations that recognize the unique challenges faced by Latinx LGBTQ+ communities while calling for evaluation practices rooted in culturally responsive, empowerment, and transformative traditions.
针对拉美裔 LGBTQ+ 文化敏感性评价实践的 "阙值 "方法
对拉美裔 LGBTQ+ 社区的评估需要一种文化响应和基于公平的方法,这种方法应重视 "拉美裔 LGBTQ+ "群体丰富多样的经历。拉美批判种族理论(LatCrit)在评估和 LGBTQ+ 评估中的最新进展,以及同性恋理论中丰富的有色人种女权主义历史谱系,为与拉美 LGBTQ+ 社区合作的评估人员提供了宝贵的见解。本文鼓励采用一种 "Queered "的 LatCrit 方法,这种方法能够有意义地探究这些经历的复杂性,并适应创伤的经历和细微差别。一种 "双重 "LatCrit 强调创造一种安全和赋权的环境的重要性,这种环境承认历史创伤和压迫,同时拒绝以赤字为基础的框架,并利用介于两者之间的优势和资产。我们触及历史、文化和方法论方面的考虑因素,主张在评估中承认拉美 LGBTQ+ 群体所面临的独特挑战,同时呼吁评估实践植根于文化响应、赋权和变革传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Directions for Evaluation
New Directions for Evaluation Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信