The obesity paradox in patients with major burn injuries: a single tertiary burn centre review

Michaela Pollock, Eldo Paul, Cheng Hean Lo
{"title":"The obesity paradox in patients with major burn injuries: a single tertiary burn centre review","authors":"Michaela Pollock, Eldo Paul, Cheng Hean Lo","doi":"10.34239/ajops.90090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The obesity paradox is a phenomenon described in medical literature where overweight and obese patients have improved survival and better health outcomes. The obesity paradox is of curiosity to many clinicians as the general consensus in medicine has been that a higher body mass index results in poorer health outcomes in both medical and surgical conditions. The aim of this study is to determine whether the obesity paradox exists in our patients with major burn injuries. To our knowledge, this has not been previously investigated in the Australian major burn population. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving patients with major burn injuries > 20 per cent total body surface area admitted to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (Melbourne, Australia) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 (five-year period). Information collected included patient demographics, weight and height, and nature of burn injuries. Primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality, and secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, duration of ventilation support required and presence of bacteraemia. Results: A total of 1704 patients were admitted, of whom 165 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. The vast majority of 31 patients (18.8%) who died during admission were palliated. The obesity paradox did not exist in this study population. Furthermore, although not statistically significant, higher levels of body mass index showed increased risk of mortality. There was no significant association between body mass index and hospital length of stay (p = 0.16), intensive care unit length of stay (p = 0.72), duration of ventilation support (p = 0.62) nor bacteraemia (p = 0.68). Conclusion: The emerging evidence regarding the obesity paradox in the burn surgery literature is inconsistent. We contend that differences in burn management, including palliation of patients with major burn injuries, contribute to these findings.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"8 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.90090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The obesity paradox is a phenomenon described in medical literature where overweight and obese patients have improved survival and better health outcomes. The obesity paradox is of curiosity to many clinicians as the general consensus in medicine has been that a higher body mass index results in poorer health outcomes in both medical and surgical conditions. The aim of this study is to determine whether the obesity paradox exists in our patients with major burn injuries. To our knowledge, this has not been previously investigated in the Australian major burn population. Methods: This is a retrospective study involving patients with major burn injuries > 20 per cent total body surface area admitted to the Victorian Adult Burns Service (Melbourne, Australia) from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 (five-year period). Information collected included patient demographics, weight and height, and nature of burn injuries. Primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality, and secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, duration of ventilation support required and presence of bacteraemia. Results: A total of 1704 patients were admitted, of whom 165 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. The vast majority of 31 patients (18.8%) who died during admission were palliated. The obesity paradox did not exist in this study population. Furthermore, although not statistically significant, higher levels of body mass index showed increased risk of mortality. There was no significant association between body mass index and hospital length of stay (p = 0.16), intensive care unit length of stay (p = 0.72), duration of ventilation support (p = 0.62) nor bacteraemia (p = 0.68). Conclusion: The emerging evidence regarding the obesity paradox in the burn surgery literature is inconsistent. We contend that differences in burn management, including palliation of patients with major burn injuries, contribute to these findings.
重度烧伤患者的肥胖悖论:一家三级烧伤中心的回顾
简介肥胖悖论是医学文献中描述的一种现象,即超重和肥胖患者的生存率更高,健康状况更好。肥胖悖论令许多临床医生感到好奇,因为医学界的普遍共识是,无论是内科还是外科手术,体重指数越高,健康状况越差。本研究的目的是确定我们的重度烧伤患者是否存在肥胖悖论。据我们所知,以前从未在澳大利亚重度烧伤人群中进行过这方面的调查。研究方法:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日(五年期间)维多利亚州成人烧伤服务机构(澳大利亚墨尔本)收治的体表总面积大于 20% 的重度烧伤患者。收集的信息包括患者的人口统计学特征、体重和身高以及烧伤性质。主要研究结果为住院患者死亡率,次要研究结果包括住院时间、重症监护室住院时间、所需通气支持时间以及是否存在菌血症。结果:共收治了 1704 名患者,其中 165 名患者符合纳入分析的标准。在入院期间死亡的 31 名患者(18.8%)中,绝大多数都得到了缓解。肥胖悖论在本研究人群中并不存在。此外,虽然没有统计学意义,但体重指数越高,死亡风险越大。体重指数与住院时间(p = 0.16)、重症监护室住院时间(p = 0.72)、通气支持时间(p = 0.62)和菌血症(p = 0.68)之间没有明显关联。结论烧伤外科文献中有关肥胖悖论的新证据并不一致。我们认为,烧伤管理方面的差异(包括对重度烧伤患者的姑息治疗)导致了这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信