Interactions of TTV with BKV, CMV, EBV, and HHV-6A and their impact on post-transplant graft function in kidney transplant recipients

K. Rosiewicz, A. Blazquez-Navarro, Sviatlana Kaliszczyk, Chris Bauer, M. Or-Guil, R. Viebahn, P. Zgoura, Petra Reinke, T. Roch, Christian Hugo, Timm H Westhoff, C. Thieme, U. Stervbo, Nina Babel
{"title":"Interactions of TTV with BKV, CMV, EBV, and HHV-6A and their impact on post-transplant graft function in kidney transplant recipients","authors":"K. Rosiewicz, A. Blazquez-Navarro, Sviatlana Kaliszczyk, Chris Bauer, M. Or-Guil, R. Viebahn, P. Zgoura, Petra Reinke, T. Roch, Christian Hugo, Timm H Westhoff, C. Thieme, U. Stervbo, Nina Babel","doi":"10.3389/frtra.2024.1393838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mono and combined reactivation of latent viruses occurs frequently under immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients. Recently, monitoring torque teno virus (TTV) reactivation came more into focus as a potential biomarker for immune status. The surrogate characteristics of TTV reactivation on acute rejection, and the combined reactivation with other latent viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), human BK virus (BKV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and human herpes virus-6A (HHV-6A) on allograft function, are unknown so far.Blood samples from 93 kidney transplant recipients obtained during the first post-transplant year were analyzed for TTV/BKV/CMV/EBV/HHV-6A load. Clinical characteristics, including graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)], were collected in parallel.TTV had the highest prevalence and viral loads at 100% and a mean of 5.72 copies/ml (cp/ml) (log10). We found 28.0%, 26.9%, 7.5%, and 51.6% of simultaneous reactivation of TTV with BKV, CMV, EBV, and HHV-6, respectively. These combined reactivations were not associated with a significantly reduced estimated GFR at month 12. Of interest, patients with lower TTV loads <5.0 cp/ml (log10) demonstrated not only a higher incidence of acute rejection, but also an unexpected significantly earlier occurrence and higher incidence of BKV and HHV-6A reactivation. Correlations between TTV loads, other latent viruses, and immunosuppressive medication were only significant from 6 months after transplant.We were able to observe and support previously introduced TTV load thresholds predicting kidney allograft rejection. However, due to a possible delayed relation between immunosuppressive medication and TTV viral load adaptation, the right time points to start using TTV as a biomarker might need to be further clarified by other and better designed studies.","PeriodicalId":317938,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Transplantation","volume":"43 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frtra.2024.1393838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mono and combined reactivation of latent viruses occurs frequently under immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant patients. Recently, monitoring torque teno virus (TTV) reactivation came more into focus as a potential biomarker for immune status. The surrogate characteristics of TTV reactivation on acute rejection, and the combined reactivation with other latent viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), human BK virus (BKV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and human herpes virus-6A (HHV-6A) on allograft function, are unknown so far.Blood samples from 93 kidney transplant recipients obtained during the first post-transplant year were analyzed for TTV/BKV/CMV/EBV/HHV-6A load. Clinical characteristics, including graft function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)], were collected in parallel.TTV had the highest prevalence and viral loads at 100% and a mean of 5.72 copies/ml (cp/ml) (log10). We found 28.0%, 26.9%, 7.5%, and 51.6% of simultaneous reactivation of TTV with BKV, CMV, EBV, and HHV-6, respectively. These combined reactivations were not associated with a significantly reduced estimated GFR at month 12. Of interest, patients with lower TTV loads <5.0 cp/ml (log10) demonstrated not only a higher incidence of acute rejection, but also an unexpected significantly earlier occurrence and higher incidence of BKV and HHV-6A reactivation. Correlations between TTV loads, other latent viruses, and immunosuppressive medication were only significant from 6 months after transplant.We were able to observe and support previously introduced TTV load thresholds predicting kidney allograft rejection. However, due to a possible delayed relation between immunosuppressive medication and TTV viral load adaptation, the right time points to start using TTV as a biomarker might need to be further clarified by other and better designed studies.
TTV 与 BKV、CMV、EBV 和 HHV-6A 的相互作用及其对肾移植受者移植后移植物功能的影响
肾移植患者在接受免疫抑制治疗时,经常会出现潜伏病毒的单次或合并再激活。最近,Torque Teno 病毒(TTV)再活监测作为一种潜在的免疫状态生物标志物受到越来越多的关注。迄今为止,TTV再活化对急性排斥反应的替代特征,以及与其他潜伏病毒(如巨细胞病毒(CMV)、人类BK病毒(BKV)、爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)和人类疱疹病毒-6A(HHV-6A))联合再活化对异体移植功能的替代特征尚不清楚。我们同时收集了临床特征,包括移植物功能[肾小球滤过率 (GFR)]。TTV发病率最高,病毒载量为100%,平均为5.72拷贝/毫升(cp/ml)(log10)。我们发现,TTV 与 BKV、CMV、EBV 和 HHV-6 同时再激活的比例分别为 28.0%、26.9%、7.5% 和 51.6%。这些合并再激活与第 12 个月时估计 GFR 的显著降低无关。值得注意的是,TTV载量低于5.0 cp/ml(log10)的患者不仅急性排斥反应发生率较高,而且BKV和HHV-6A再活化发生的时间明显提前,发生率也较高。TTV载量、其他潜伏病毒和免疫抑制药物之间的相关性仅在移植后6个月才显着。然而,由于免疫抑制药物与TTV病毒载量适应之间可能存在延迟关系,因此开始使用TTV作为生物标志物的正确时间点可能需要通过其他设计更好的研究来进一步明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信