Performance evaluation of ruthenium complexes and organic sensitizers in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells

Muniba Ayub, Nadia Shahzad, Ahad Hussain Javed, Sana Mehmood, Saad Nadeem, Zuhair S. Khan, Sehar Shakir, Faroha Liaqat, Ghulam Shabir, Faisal Abbas, Muhammad Imran Shahzad, Diego Pugliese
{"title":"Performance evaluation of ruthenium complexes and organic sensitizers in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells","authors":"Muniba Ayub, Nadia Shahzad, Ahad Hussain Javed, Sana Mehmood, Saad Nadeem, Zuhair S. Khan, Sehar Shakir, Faroha Liaqat, Ghulam Shabir, Faisal Abbas, Muhammad Imran Shahzad, Diego Pugliese","doi":"10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Ruthenium (Ru) dyes are a well-known player in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to their high efficiency and excellent stability. Their properties and complexes have been studied for almost three decades. Although these sensitizers show better performances, their high cost makes these third-generation solar devices less economical. Organic dyes have recently been explored as an alternative to Ru-based dyes due to their easy and low-cost synthesis. A comparative performance evaluation of Ru complexes and dicyanoisophorone and rhodanine organic dyes in ZnO-based DSSCs is here reported. All the Ru complexes showed better performance in comparison to organic dyes except R-4. Among the Ru sensitizers, R-3 exhibited the highest efficiency of 1.21% followed by R-2, which is attributed to the presence of several anchoring groups such as carboxyl, nitro and amine. However, the presence of more nitrogen-based groups has drastically reduced the performance as observed for R-4, which is the least performing dye among the Ru-based ones. On the contrary, organic sensitizers S-06 and P-4 revealed to be less efficient with respect to R-3 owing to the presence of only one anchoring group and weak photoanode/dye interaction.","PeriodicalId":505725,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Express","volume":"75 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ruthenium (Ru) dyes are a well-known player in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to their high efficiency and excellent stability. Their properties and complexes have been studied for almost three decades. Although these sensitizers show better performances, their high cost makes these third-generation solar devices less economical. Organic dyes have recently been explored as an alternative to Ru-based dyes due to their easy and low-cost synthesis. A comparative performance evaluation of Ru complexes and dicyanoisophorone and rhodanine organic dyes in ZnO-based DSSCs is here reported. All the Ru complexes showed better performance in comparison to organic dyes except R-4. Among the Ru sensitizers, R-3 exhibited the highest efficiency of 1.21% followed by R-2, which is attributed to the presence of several anchoring groups such as carboxyl, nitro and amine. However, the presence of more nitrogen-based groups has drastically reduced the performance as observed for R-4, which is the least performing dye among the Ru-based ones. On the contrary, organic sensitizers S-06 and P-4 revealed to be less efficient with respect to R-3 owing to the presence of only one anchoring group and weak photoanode/dye interaction.
氧化锌染料敏化太阳能电池中钌络合物和有机敏化剂的性能评估
钌(Ru)染料因其高效率和出色的稳定性而在染料敏化太阳能电池(DSSC)领域享有盛誉。近三十年来,人们一直在研究它们的特性和配合物。虽然这些敏化剂显示出更好的性能,但其高昂的成本使得这些第三代太阳能设备不太经济。最近,有机染料因其合成简便、成本低廉而被视为 Ru 基染料的替代品。本文报告了 Ru 复合物与二氰异佛尔酮和罗丹宁有机染料在氧化锌基 DSSC 中的性能比较评估。与有机染料相比,除 R-4 外,所有 Ru 复合物都表现出更好的性能。在 Ru 增感剂中,R-3 的效率最高,为 1.21%,其次是 R-2,这归因于其存在多个锚定基团,如羧基、硝基和胺基。然而,正如 R-4 所观察到的那样,含有更多的氮基基团会大大降低其性能,而 R-4 是 Ru 基染料中性能最低的一种。相反,有机敏化剂 S-06 和 P-4 由于只存在一个锚定基团以及光阳极/染料之间的相互作用较弱,其效率低于 R-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信